{"numFound":7,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment","results":[{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Despite the uncertainty in future climate and land use, large-scale measures put in place today to improve water quality are likely to remain effective in the future in northeast Scotland. Dynamic models can provide useful indications of the likely lag time between the implementation of measures and improvements in water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"7f45279b-5818-4667-8a6e-3439f26c6e44","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Time series"],"impScale":["River reach","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Climate scenarios"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Time series","Sediment","River reach","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","Management outcome","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchment"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7f45279b-5818-4667-8a6e-3439f26c6e44"],"resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 4: Effectiveness of pollution control measures under scenarios of future climate and land cover change at the catchment scale.  ","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"Despite the uncertainty in future climate and land use, large-scale measures put in place today to improve water quality are likely to remain effective in the future in northeast Scotland. Dynamic models can provide useful indications of the likely lag time between..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Farmscoper is a decision support tool that allows an assessment of the cost and effectiveness of agricultural mitigation methods on multiple pollutants. It incorporates meta-models of a number of different pollutant models which have previously been used for government policy support at national scale. Farmscoper was originally developed for use at farm scale, but the tool has now been expanded (v3) to include functionality to predict pollutant losses and mitigation impacts for multiple farms in order to simulate one or more catchments. It contains all the data required for use at Water Management Catchment scale in England. ","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"a08670f4-e00c-4dcb-8e08-cfc8bb6dbde7","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Cost Effectiveness","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Farm","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Soil","Sediment","Regional","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Farm","Cost Effectiveness","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/a08670f4-e00c-4dcb-8e08-cfc8bb6dbde7"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"FARMSCOPER  (Farm Scale Optimisation of Pollutant Emission Reductions)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"Farmscoper is a decision support tool that allows an assessment of the cost and effectiveness of agricultural mitigation methods on multiple pollutants. It incorporates meta-models of a number of different pollutant models which have previously been used for government..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The impacts of the suite of Countryside Stewardship options were reductions in national agricultural pollution of over 6% (nitrate) and 10% (phosphorus). Accounting for non-agricultural sources of pollution reduced the net overall impact of the options to 4% (nitrate) and 3% (phosphorus). There would also be a net reduction in GHG emissions from agriculture.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"a426ddf1-fd15-40ae-9897-5bf73c610df0","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Cost Effectiveness"],"impDataType":["Tabular","Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Sediment","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Geospatial / Map","Cost Effectiveness"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/a426ddf1-fd15-40ae-9897-5bf73c610df0"],"resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 2: Effectiveness of land management policies and agri-environment interventions for reducing pollutant loads and maintaining environmental quality at the national scale. ","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"The impacts of the suite of Countryside Stewardship options were reductions in national agricultural pollution of over 6% (nitrate) and 10% (phosphorus). Accounting for non-agricultural sources of pollution reduced the net overall impact of the options to 4% (nitrate)..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"INCA-P operates at a daily time step, tracking the stores and fluxes of water, sediment, dissolved and particulate P in both the land and in-stream phases of a river catchment. The model is spatially ‘semi-distributed’: the water course is split into reaches with associated sub-catchments. Two spatial set-ups are possible – the traditional set-up, in which there is a single main stem, or a ‘branched’ set-up. The latter allows in-stream processes, effluent inputs and residence times in tributaries to be simulated, and can be particularly useful in larger catchments or complex river networks. Each sub-catchment is split into landscape classes – there can be as many of these as desired or warranted by the data resolution or needs of the study. Landscape classes are “functional units” and within each unit P inputs, plant P uptake, soils and flow pathways should be similar, though for convenience classes are often based on land use and/or soil type. All land-based processes are calculated for a generic 1 km2 cell for each landscape class within each sub-catchment. Water, sediment, total dissolved P (TDP) and particulate P (PP) outputs from the 1 km2 cell for each land class are multiplied by the land class area, and summed to provide total inputs from the sub-catchment to the reach. These inputs are assumed to enter the stream reach directly, rather than being routed spatially from one land class to another. Reach inputs are therefore from the land phase and from any upstream reaches.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"dc139812-d332-44fb-8fc4-f9943652d1ef","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Time series"],"impScale":["River reach","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","River flow and networks","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Time series","Sediment","River reach","River flow and networks","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Management outcome","Land use","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchments and topography","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/dc139812-d332-44fb-8fc4-f9943652d1ef"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"INCA-P  (Integrated Catchments Model - Phosphorus dynamics)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"INCA-P operates at a daily time step, tracking the stores and fluxes of water, sediment, dissolved and particulate P in both the land and in-stream phases of a river catchment. The model is spatially ‘semi-distributed’: the water course is split into reaches with associated..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying software implementation of the Polyscape framework. \nThe model was developed through work at Pontbren, exploring impacts of land-use on flooding. Landcover types providing mitigation from flash-flood risk and diffuse pollution through enhanced infiltration (e.g. woodlands and wetlands); these are mapped as providing a service. LUCI then simulates flow and nutrient accumulation over the landscape, with areas routing through these mitigating features mapped as “mitigated” i.e. not hydrologically connected to the stream. Hydrologically connected areas of the landscape with large accumulations of water or pollutants are mapped as having potential to benefit from changes inland cover or management which could provide mitigating services. Hydrological routing is also used to map annual flow and average loading and concentration of N and P at each point on the river network. For agricultural production and carbon, LUCI compares the services provided by the current utilisation of the landscape to estimates of its potential capability. For each service, the model then processes this data to identify areas where change might improve service provision, and where current service provision is good or lacks potential to improve. Trade-offs between outputs for the individual ecosystem services are modelled and mapped, with an option for the user to preferentially weight services of higher importance.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","Plot","National","Field","Farm","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","River flow and networks","Regional","Plot","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Field","Farm","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"LUCI  (Land Utilisation & Capability Indicator)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"SWAT is the product of over 40 years of research and is subject to ongoing development. The model is designed to simulate the effects of changes in land management practices, land use and climate on surface water and groundwater quality and quantity, sediments, nutrients, and pesticide yields within catchments.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"9bc5ab5c-bacf-426f-b49e-c6013e815a85","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impScale":["River reach","Farm","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Non-agricultural pollution","Climate scenarios"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Nitrogen","Metaldehyde"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","River reach","River flow and networks","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","Metaldehyde","Management outcome","Farm","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/9bc5ab5c-bacf-426f-b49e-c6013e815a85"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SWAT  (Soil and Water Assessment Tool)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"SWAT is the product of over 40 years of research and is subject to ongoing development. The model is designed to simulate the effects of changes in land management practices, land use and climate on surface water and groundwater quality and quantity, sediments, nutrients,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This case study examines potential trade-offs and co-benefits for a suite of ecosystem services at the farm to catchment scale that may be potential ‘by-products’ of an agri-environment scheme designed to reduce total multi-pollutant loads entering watercourses.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"8216c008-577c-4e06-810a-1a7a480cc179","impCaMMPIssues":["Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Pollution Source"],"impDataType":["Time series","Tabular","Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["River reach","National","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity","Non-agricultural pollution"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Faecal Indicator Organisms"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water Quality","Time series","Tabular","Soil","Sediment","River reach","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Confidence levels","Catchment","Biodiversity","Pollution Source","Non-agricultural pollution","Geospatial / Map","Faecal Indicator Organisms"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8216c008-577c-4e06-810a-1a7a480cc179"],"resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 1: Multiple pollutant and ecosystem services responses to land management policies and agri-environment interventions at the farm to catchment scale.","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"This case study examines potential trade-offs and co-benefits for a suite of ecosystem services at the farm to catchment scale that may be potential ‘by-products’ of an agri-environment scheme designed to reduce total multi-pollutant loads entering watercourses."}],"facets":[{"fieldName":"resourceType","displayName":"Resource type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Case Study","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=resourceType%7CCase+Study","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Dataset","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=resourceType%7CDataset","active":false,"count":122},{"name":"Model (UKCEH)","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=resourceType%7CModel+%28UKCEH%29","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impCaMMPIssues","displayName":"CaMMP Issues","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Climate Change","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CClimate+Change","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Confidence levels","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CConfidence+levels","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Cost Effectiveness","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CCost+Effectiveness","active":false,"count":3},{"name":"Management outcome","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment","active":true,"count":12},{"name":"Other Services","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7COther+Services","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Pollution Source","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CPollution+Source","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Transferability","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CTransferability","active":false,"count":13}]},{"fieldName":"impDataType","displayName":"Data Type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Geospatial / Map","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impDataType%7CGeospatial+%2F+Map","active":false,"count":69},{"name":"Tabular","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impDataType%7CTabular","active":false,"count":42},{"name":"Time Series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impDataType%7CTime+Series","active":false,"count":37},{"name":"Time series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impDataType%7CTime+series","active":false,"count":5}]},{"fieldName":"impScale","displayName":"Scale","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","active":false,"count":47},{"name":"Farm","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CFarm","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Field","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CField","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"National","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CNational","active":false,"count":93},{"name":"Plot","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CPlot","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Regional","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"River Reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+Reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"River reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7Ccatchment","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"national","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7Cnational","active":false,"count":3}]},{"fieldName":"impTopic","displayName":"Topic","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Administration Units","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CAdministration+Units","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Agricultural Practices","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CAgricultural+Practices","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Air Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CAir+Quality","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Biodiversity","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CBiodiversity","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Catchments and Topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+Topography","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"Catchments and topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+topography","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Climate Scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+Scenarios","active":false,"count":8},{"name":"Climate scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+scenarios","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Geology","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CGeology","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+Gas+Fluxes","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Greenhouse gas fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+gas+fluxes","active":false,"count":5},{"name":"Land Cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Cover","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Land Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Use","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Land cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+cover","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Land use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+use","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural Pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+Pollution","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+pollution","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"River Flow and Networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+Flow+and+Networks","active":false,"count":17},{"name":"River flow and networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+flow+and+networks","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Site Specific Data","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CSite+Specific+Data","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Soil","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CSoil","active":false,"count":18},{"name":"Water Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Quality","active":false,"count":44},{"name":"Water Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Use","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Water quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+quality","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Weather","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impTopic%7CWeather","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impWaterPollutant","displayName":"Water Pollutant","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Biological Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+Quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Biological quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Faecal Indicator Organisms","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CFaecal+Indicator+Organisms","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Metaldehyde","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CMetaldehyde","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Nitrogen","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":false,"count":33},{"name":"Phosphorous","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorous","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Phosphorus","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus","active":false,"count":30},{"name":"Sediment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome","active":true,"count":17}]}],"order":"asc"}