{"numFound":132,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?page=2&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational","results":[{"publicationDate":"2013-07-26T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.M.","C.","D.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Cooper","Evans","Norris","Burden","Lawler"],"authorFullName":["Cooper, D.M.","Evans, C.","Norris, D.","Burden, A.","Lawler, A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-7918","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-555X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-1638"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Surface water quality data for the Conwy catchment, North Wales are presented. The data cover stream and estuary survey locations sampled manually from 2007 to 2011 at varying intervals between fortnightly and quarterly. Survey locations were selected as draining the main landscape classes in the catchment, which include upland (>300m) and lowland (<300m) environments under trees, moorland or improved agriculture. Also included are a suite of locations on the major rivers, and in the estuary. The purpose of the data is to provide support for estimating loads and testing hypotheses relating to the relationship between subcatchment properties and water quality, and the relative importance of mixing and in-stream processes in influencing downstream water quality. Streams draining peat, with high dissolved organic carbon concentrations, are well represented. Upland drainage is generally acidic, and lowland circum-neutral. The lowland rivers are not heavily contaminated with nutrients, although they show evidence of some loss of nitrates in particular. There is little industry in the catchment beyond agriculture and tourism, though there is some legacy contamination from metal mines in a small part of the catchment. Measurements are provided for major cations and anions, pH, alkalinity, DOC, Al, Fe and conductivity for most samples, with values for a wide range of trace elements for a limited number of samples.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"d94c5478-2588-4e52-bc29-308ea0b9808e","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["D.M.","C.","D.","A.","David"],"familyName":["Cooper","Evans","Norris","Burden","Lawler"],"fullName":["Cooper, D.M.","Evans, C.","Norris, D.","Burden, A.","Lawler, A.","Cooper, D."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Conwy Catchment","Wales","United Kingdom","Water quality","river","stream","lake","water quality","hydrochemistry"],"keywordsPlace":["Conwy Catchment","Wales","United Kingdom"],"keywordsTheme":["Water quality"],"keywordsOther":["river","stream","lake","water quality","hydrochemistry"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Water samples were collected at 67 sites within the Conwy catchment, N. Wales. Many of the sampling sites are headwaters; some are on major tributaries or the main Conwy river. Headwater sites were selected in a manner loosely stratified by 'landscape class' formed by combining dominant land use and soils classes. However, site locations were not randomised, but all readily accessible from roads. The purpose of data collection was to 1) To help identify statistical relationships between headwater stream chemistry and catchment characteristics and 2) To provide test data for modelling stream water chemistry at downstream sites. The PEARLS/CASCADE model has been used for this purpose. In recent years the focus has been on the carbon budget, and the data may be compared with data from other experimental and survey projects within the catchment. Many sites were originally selected for acid rain research and have earlier data not included in the database. These sites were part of a wider network covering North and Mid Wales. For some sites there are additional data from sampling by other bodies, such as the Environment Agency (EA). Other Conwy sites not recorded may also have EA or other data. Samples were filtered immediately after collection through a 0.45µm cellulose nitrate filter paper. In situ measurements of pH and conductivity were taken at the same time as water samples were collected. Samples were stored below 4°C before analysis in the UKAS accredited labs in CEH Lancaster. The results from 60 determinands are presented in the dataset, including the standard suite of base cations, anions and metals. Full details of site location, field and laboratory methodology is included in the supporting documents that accompany the dataset.","locations":["POLYGON((-4.031 52.944, -4.031 53.31, -3.592 53.31, -3.592 52.944, -4.031 52.944))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-7918","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-555X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-1638"],"organisation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/c53a1f93-f64c-4d84-82a7-44038a394c59","10.5285/c53a1f93-f64c-4d84-82a7-44038a394c59"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Conwy catchment - spatial water chemistry dataset","topic":["0/Water quality/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Surface water quality data for the Conwy catchment, North Wales are presented. The data cover stream and estuary survey locations sampled manually from 2007 to 2011 at varying intervals between fortnightly and quarterly. Survey locations were selected as draining the..."},{"publicationDate":"2017-02-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Atkins Ltd"],"authorGivenName":["P."],"authorFamilyName":["Daldorph"],"authorFullName":["Daldorph, P."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate loads are expressed as kilograms per day (kg/day) and the in-river concentrations as milligrams per litre (mg/l). Sources are both diffuse and point. Diffuse sources include livestock farming, arable farming, highways, urban runoff, background (from soils), onsite wastewater treatment systems and atmospheric deposition. Point sources include treated wastewater effluent, combined sewer overflows and storm tanks, industrial discharges and mine water discharges. Concentrations and loads are modelled using the Environment Agency's catchment river model, SIMCAT, at the locations of model features or every 1 km along each river, taking into account all upstream sources and user defined river losses. \n\nSAGIS is a modelling framework was developed through the UK Water Industry Research Programme (UKWIR) project 'Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD' [1], with support from the Environment Agency and SEPA. The model is also described in [2]\n\n[1] UKWIR (2012) Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD (12/WW/02/3). Final report for UK Water Industry Research, 1 Queen Annes Gate, London, ISBN: 1 84057 637 5.\n[2] Comber, S.D.; Smith, R.; Daldorph, P.; Gardner, M.J.; Constantino, C.; Ellor, B. (2013) Development of a Chemical Source Apportionment Decision Support Framework for Catchment Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9824-9832","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"8677dabe-bc76-4a03-8764-0bedc8976928","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Catchment","National"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Peter","P."],"familyName":["Daldorph"],"fullName":["Daldorph, P.","UKWIR"],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Catchment","National","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Pollution","nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"keywordsOther":["nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"This dataset has been modelled with The Source Apportionment-GIS (SAGIS) using data from the period spanning from 2006 to 2009. Input datasets include: river network outline, water body boundary, hydrology and river monitoring data, rainfall, land use and agricultural data, on-site wastewater treatment system, sewage treatment works, combined sewer overflows and storm tank locations, soil erosion, highway runoff and pollution inventory industrial discharges to river and sewer including extensive sewage treatment works data. \n\nLoads are converted to concentrations in river waters using the SIMulation of CATchments (SIMCAT) water quality model, which is incorporated within SAGIS, so that the contribution to in-stream concentrations from individual sources can be quantified. Diffuse sources of nutrient pollution are incorporated into SAGIS from the Phosphorus and Sediment Yield Characterisation In Catchments (PSYCHIC) model (developed by a consortium of academic and government organisations led by ADAS Water Quality). \n\nSAGIS models are not time based and do not show seasonal variation; river flow can vary according to seasonal changes which would have an impact on results. The model will also always be a simplified version of reality and so must be used as an advisory tool and not as the sole basis of decisions. Data is often subject to change and so the models require regular updates. Livestock and arable inputs have been calculated from the ADAS models PSYCHIC and NEAPN and have been shown to overestimate inputs in some areas. There is also a related issue, of changing crop types and land use.","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"organisation":["Atkins Ltd","UK Water Industry Research","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf","10.5285/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Water Industry Research"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910","https://ror.org/00ajykz30","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Source apportionment of nutrient contributions to rivers in England and Wales modelled with SAGIS","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate..."},{"publicationDate":"2013-07-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","J.C.","N.","I.","R."],"authorFamilyName":["Bhardwaj","Dodd","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"authorFullName":["Bhardwaj, C.L.","Dodd, J.C.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Micro-organic herbicide levels in river water for various sites within the Humber and Tweed catchments collected as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study project (LOIS). The dataset contains data for Phenyl urea and Phenoxy acid herbicides, measured as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 4-(4-Chloro-O-tolyloxy) butyric acid, 4-Chloro-O-tolyloxyacetic acid, Chlorotoluron dissolved, Diuron dissolved, Isoproturon dissolved, Linuron dissolved, Mecoprop dissolved. Phenyl urea herbicide data is available for twelve sites in the Humber catchment within 1994 to 1995 and 1994 to 1997 and for three sites on the Tweed catchment within 1995. Phenoxy acid herbicide data is available for six sites (S1, U3, N4, W5 and O6) over the period December 1994 to September 1995, for 7 sites (S2, D7, A8, C9, D10, T11 and O12) over the period December 1994 to February 1997 and 3 sites (TW13, TW14 and TW15) over the period January 1995 to September 1995. Attempts were made to sample the sites at weekly intervals. However sampling was halted for short periods when it was not possible to process the samples quickly. Linuron dissolved was only measured from April 1994 - October 1994. Samples were collected in chromic acid-washed 1 litre glass bottles. Herbicide levels were concentrated before being measured using High Performance Liquid Chromatography for Phenyl urea herbicides and Gas Chromatography for Phenoxy acid herbicides. Until November 1994, analysis was completed by the York University and the Institute for Freshwater Ecology, Wareham, laboratories. From December 1994 onwards the samples were dispatched to the Institute for Hydrology, Wallingford, for extraction and analyses.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"d13b18ea-6930-4b0e-83e4-4939ee74dcd2","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices","Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["C.L.","J.C.","N.","I.","R."],"familyName":["Bhardwaj","Dodd","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"fullName":["Bhardwaj, C.L.","Dodd, J.C.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Agricultural Practices","Water Quality","Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd","Phenyl urea","Phenoxy acid","2-4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid","4-(4-Chloro-O-tolyloxy) butyric acid","4-Chloro-O-tolyloxyacetic acid","Chlorotoluron","Diuron","Isoproturon","Linuron","Mecoprop","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","water quality","herbicide","Water quality"],"keywordsPlace":["Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd"],"keywordsOther":["Phenyl urea","Phenoxy acid","2-4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid","4-(4-Chloro-O-tolyloxy) butyric acid","4-Chloro-O-tolyloxyacetic acid","Chlorotoluron","Diuron","Isoproturon","Linuron","Mecoprop","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","water quality","herbicide","Water quality"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Phenyl urea herbicides were concentrated by using one of the following methods: solid phase extraction (SPE) using C18 (1gm, 6ml) (EC) (ISOLUTE) cartridges and eluting with ethyl acetate; as previous method except that the dried cartridge after loading was washed with 6ml of methanol: water:: 1:1 (to remove the impurities) before eluting the herbicides with methanol; liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane. Phenoxy acid herbicides were concentrated using liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane. Phenyl urea herbicides were measured by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with detection by a UV/VIS detector and phenoxy acid herbicides by Gas Chromatography (GC) with detection by a mass selective detector (GS-MS). One sample from each batch was randomly spiked with a mixed standard of urea and acid herbicides for comparison purposes. For all determinands certified grade standards of purity >99% were used. The laboratory at Wallingford takes part in WRC's AQUACHECK inter-laboratory harmonisation exercise for urea and acid herbicides. Data quality for both groups of herbicides is variable because of the nature of samples (Aire, Calder, Don and Trent were found to be highly polluted resulting in complex chromatograms), the level of herbicides present (mostly they are close to the detection limit) and difficulties in extraction especially in liquid-liquid extraction where they formed emulsions. A zip file of box-and-whisker plots are available for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site to enable prospective users to understand data quality.","locations":["POLYGON((-2.75 53.1, -2.75 55.8, -0.72 55.8, -0.72 53.1, -2.75 53.1))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1373029956118","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e28ffc01-880d-423f-acb6-879b9fd4603a","10.5285/e28ffc01-880d-423f-acb6-879b9fd4603a"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["British Oceanographic Data Centre's webpages for information on and data from the coastal and marine aspects of the LOIS project."],"supplementalName":["BODC LOIS web pages (coastal and marine)"],"title":"Micro-organic herbicides data from rivers [LOIS]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Micro-organic herbicide levels in river water for various sites within the Humber and Tweed catchments collected as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study project (LOIS). The dataset contains data for Phenyl urea and Phenoxy acid herbicides, measured as 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-07-19T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (DTC) Data"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each catchment has an area of approximately 10km2. The stream water quality and biology were monitored to understand how the catchment responds to storm events. This work included measuring many properties of the water including the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and total amount of water leaving the catchment.\n\nThe experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\nFocus catchment outlets at Newby Beck and Pow were both equipped with in-situ analysers and sondes (Hach Lange Sigmatax, Phosphax, Nitratax and ammonium sondes; and a YSI sonde) to monitor the following parameters: total phosphorus , total reactive phosphorus, nitrate , ammonium, pH, conductivity, water temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll-a, turbidity and water level. The catchment outlet at Thackthwaite was equipped with a YSI sonde only, and measured the same parameters except for nutrients. \n\nNested within all focus catchments, smaller sub-catchments were monitored for turbidity (Analite sonde) and water level. At every monitoring location, an ISCO auto-sampler collected water samples during selected storm events. These samples were routinely analysed in the laboratory, which enables the in situ water quality analysis to be checked against standard methods. Each focus catchment also has its own automated weather station (AWS) including a tipping bucket rain gauge, plus two additional tipping bucket rain gauges. At each monitoring site, where water level was recorded, the stream was gauged and rating curves developed, which were used to convert water level into flow. This archive contains quality assured data generated by field monitoring and laboratory analysis by EdenDTC. Sample collection, analysis and quality assurance protocols were implemented, details of which can be found in the relevant supplementary document.","locations":["POLYGON((-3.157 54.304, -3.157 54.943, -2.124 54.943, -2.124 54.304, -3.157 54.304))"],"organisation":["Eden DTC"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrological and ecological monitoring in the river Eden catchment (2011 - 2015) [DTC project]","version":1.0,"view":["public","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each..."},{"publicationDate":"2013-07-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.","A.","P.","N.","I.","R."],"authorFamilyName":["Leach","Pinder","Wass","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"authorFullName":["Leach, D.","Pinder, A.","Wass, P.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"On site measurements of pH, conductivity and temperature for thirteen sites in the Humber catchment and three sites in the Tweed catchment within the period 1994 to 1997 as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study project (LOIS). Sites were sampled at regular weekly intervals and more intermittently during high flows (on average an extra sampling once a month per site). Samples were obtained using a wide neck PTFE bottle in a plastic covered bottle carrier (lowered from bridges where possible otherwise collected by immersing sample bottle by hand in the water as near the main flow as possible). pH and conductivity reading were taken using Mettler Toledo Check Mate meters and probes. Temperature readings were obtained using a PT 100 probe with a Digitron 3204 Pt meter (RS components). The measurements were carried out by members of the field sampling team at York University, as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS).","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"7508a232-a0dc-46f5-9e49-4190fca8d844","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["D.","A.","P.","N.","I.","R."],"familyName":["Leach","Pinder","Wass","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"fullName":["Leach, D.","Pinder, A.","Wass, P.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd","temperature","pH","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","conductivity","water quality","Water Resources","Water quality","Rees Section"],"keywordsPlace":["Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd"],"keywordsOther":["temperature","pH","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","conductivity","water quality","Water Resources","Water quality","Rees Section"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The pH probes were calibrated in the laboratory using pH 7.0 and 10.00 buffers. Conductivity probes were calibrated in air and with a 1417 uS KCl standard. The calibration of the probes was checked on site for drift and recalibrated if necessary. The probes were gently swirled in a freshly collected sample for two minutes and then the average of three readings taken. A zip file containing box-and-whisker plots for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site is available to enable prospective users of the data to understand data quality.","locations":["POLYGON((-2.75 53.1, -2.75 55.8, -0.72 55.8, -0.72 53.1, -2.75 53.1))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1373029733882","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/329cbe8f-a292-4c5f-a15a-6528774dbee7","10.5285/329cbe8f-a292-4c5f-a15a-6528774dbee7"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["British Oceanographic Data Centre's webpages for information on and data from the coastal and marine aspects of the LOIS project."],"supplementalName":["BODC LOIS web pages (coastal and marine)"],"title":"Field measurements of pH, conductivity and temperature data from rivers [LOIS]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"On site measurements of pH, conductivity and temperature for thirteen sites in the Humber catchment and three sites in the Tweed catchment within the period 1994 to 1997 as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study project (LOIS). Sites were sampled at regular weekly..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-07-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["R.D.","C.S.","C.M.","L.","C.G.","G.M."],"authorFamilyName":["Morton","Rowland","Wood","Meek","Marston","Smith"],"authorFullName":["Morton, R.D.","Rowland, C.S.","Wood, C.M.","Meek, L.","Marston, C.G.","Smith, G.M."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-6463","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-506X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-2187"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This dataset consists of a 1km resolution raster version of the Land Cover Map 2007 for Great Britain. The raster consists of 10 bands. Within each band, each 1km pixel represents a percentage cover value for one of 10 aggregate classes. The aggregate classes are aggregations of the target classes, broadly representing Broad Habitats (see below). The dataset is part of a series of data products produced by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology known as LCM2007. LCM2007 is a parcel-based thematic classification of satellite image data covering the entire United Kingdom. The map updates and upgrades the Land Cover Map of Great Britain (LCMGB) 1990 and LCM2000. Like the earlier 1990 and 2000 products, LCM2007 is derived from a computer classification of satellite scenes obtained mainly from Landsat, IRS and SPOT sensors and also incorporates information derived from other ancillary datasets. LCM2007 was classified using a nomenclature corresponding to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Broad Habitats, which encompasses the entire range of UK habitats. In addition, it recorded further detail where possible. The series of LCM2007 products includes vector and raster formats, with a number of different versions containing varying levels of detail and at different spatial resolutions.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"f6b48292-f2cf-449f-863c-69a200b5226f","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Land Cover"],"incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["R.D.","C.S.","C.M.","L.","C.G.","G.M."],"familyName":["Morton","Rowland","Wood","Meek","Marston","Smith"],"fullName":["Morton, R.D.","Rowland, C.S.","Wood, C.M.","Meek, L.","Marston, C.G.","Smith, G.M."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Land Cover","Great Britain","England","Scotland","Wales","Land cover"],"keywordsPlace":["Great Britain","England","Scotland","Wales"],"keywordsTheme":["Land cover"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"LCM2007 uses a spatial framework based on OS MasterMap (R). MasterMap was generalised to remove unnecessary detail, then the framework was segmented according to the underlying satellite data to split areas of non-uniform landscape. The data was classified according to a parcel-based supervised maximum likelihood classification procedure. The raster products are derived from the vector products. Version 1.2 includes the addition of OS tiles NW and HZ. See online supporting documentation for further details.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-6463","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-506X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-2187"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1399373975762","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/289805c2-4be7-4fb5-b6ec-1539ed88c43d","10.5285/289805c2-4be7-4fb5-b6ec-1539ed88c43d"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["R.D. Morton, C. Rowland, C. Wood, L. Meek, C. Marston, G. Smith, R. Wadsworth, I. Simpson. July 2011 CS Technical Report No 11/07: Final Report for LCM2007 - the new UK land cover map. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH Project Number NEC03259)."],"title":"Land Cover Map 2007 (1km percentage aggregate class, GB) v1.2","topic":["0/Land cover/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset consists of a 1km resolution raster version of the Land Cover Map 2007 for Great Britain. The raster consists of 10 bands. Within each band, each 1km pixel represents a percentage cover value for one of 10 aggregate classes. The aggregate classes are aggregations..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Farm Business Survey (FBS) provides information on the financial, physical and environmental performance of farm businesses in England to inform and evaluate policy decisions. The FBS is intended to serve the needs of farmers, farming and land management interest groups, government, government partners and researchers. Survey results typically give comparisons between groups of businesses, e.g between regions or between farm types. The results attracting most attention are on farm incomes and productivity. Some of the results are produced and published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), whilst others are produced and published by the Rural Business Research (RBR) team.\n\nThe farm business survey produces a number of reports, the most influential of which are.\n\nFarm Accounts (1999-2015) in England is the primary publication from the Farm Business Survey. It provides information on farm incomes, outputs and costs for the various farm types, farm sizes, regions and economic performance. This report can also include information on weather, diversification and succession .\n\nFarm Business Income (2011-15) - Annual statistics on farm business income in England.\n\nFarm Household Income and Household Composition (2005-2015) - Data on farm household income, which comprises Farm Business Income (including that from diversified enterprises), the off-farm income of the principal farmer and their spouse/common law partner and income from other household members. Information also on household composition and farm net worth and assets.\n\nFarm Rents (1968-2015) - Annual statistics about average farm rents in England.\n\nFarmer’s intentions (2010-11, 2013-14) - Farmers’ aspirations and plans for the whole business and for individual enterprises.\n\nWater usage on farms (2009-10, 2013-15) - Estimates of water use on farms in England.\n\nOther analysis from the farm business survey include - \n\nAnimal health and welfare (2005-6, 2011-12) - Extensive information on cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry.\n\nBalance sheet analysis and farm performance (2010-11, 2012-13) - This release presents the main results from an analysis of the profitability and resilience of farms in England.\n\nCountryside maintenance and management (2005-11) - Number of farms participating in countryside management and maintenance activity (CMMA) and costs involved. Participation in different types of CMMA also documented (e.g Soil and water protection)\n\nFarm business management practices (2010-11) - Information on farmers qualifications and relevant skills across farm types. Computer usage information also there.\n\nFarm diversification (1998-2010) - Number of holdings participating in some form of diversification, by type of diversification, farm size and farm type. Later reports include the contribution of diversification to farm income. This is now included under farm accounts.\n\nFarm energy use ( 2007-2008, 2011-2012) - Fuel use, fertiliser use, minimum tillage information, dairy feed intake, straw baling, contractor use\n\nFarm Succession (2013-14) - Data about the presence and nature of farm business succession arrangements.\n\nFertiliser usage on farms (2012-15) - Data (by region) on the quantities of nutrients from manufactured fertilisers that were applied from a subset of farms within the main survey. The use of precision farming techniques, soil nutrient software, clover and legumes in grass swards, green manures and areas subject to fertiliser restrictions. \n\nMilk selling arrangements (2010) - Data on the milk selling arrangements of Dairy Farmers.\n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"0e1bb9f5-6154-4f26-91df-7bca7e3ce38d","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Land Use","Agricultural Practices","Greenhouse Gas Fluxes"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Agriculture","Land use","Tabular","National","Land Use","Agricultural Practices","Greenhouse Gas Fluxes"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","locations":["POLYGON((-6.4526 49.864, -6.4526 55.812, 1.7675 55.812, 1.7675 49.864, -6.4526 49.864))"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/0e1bb9f5-6154-4f26-91df-7bca7e3ce38d"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Defra Farm Business Survey (1999-2015)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Farm Business Survey (FBS) provides information on the financial, physical and environmental performance of farm businesses in England to inform and evaluate policy decisions. The FBS is intended to serve the needs of farmers, farming and land management interest..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Dataset of 337 soil monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including: purpose of the monitoring (exempt waste to land and sewage sludge to land); sampling method and analytic function, and approximate annual frequency of the monitoring.\n\nMonitoring data itself can be requested from SEPA.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"63b5793f-e329-4dd0-9380-dbdf8bb49455","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Soil"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Site Specific Data","Soil"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Unknown","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["Scottish Environmental Protection Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/63b5793f-e329-4dd0-9380-dbdf8bb49455"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"SEPA Soil Monitoring sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset of 337 soil monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including: purpose of the monitoring..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-06-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["IHU Areas with Coastline","Hydrometric areas for Great Britain and Northern Ireland"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorFullName":["National River Flow Archive"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrometric Units (IHU) of the UK. Hydrometric Areas are used to organise river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection in the UK. Hydrometric Areas are either integral river catchments having one or more outlets to the sea or tidal estuary, or they may include several contiguous river catchments having topographical similarity but separate tidal outlets. In mainland Britain they are numbered from 1 to 97 in clockwise order around the coast commencing in north east Scotland. The larger islands and groups of islands are numbered from 100-108. Ireland has a unified numbering system from 1 to 40 commencing with the River Foyle catchment and circulating clockwise; not all Irish Hydrometric Areas, however, have an outlet to the coast. Only those Hydrometric Areas covering Great Britain and Northern Ireland are included in this dataset. The boundaries between hydrometric areas correspond to catchment boundaries as digitally-derived from CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) using a catchment definition program. It should be noticed that the Northern Ireland data are clipped to its political boundary so not every Hydrometric Area in this region is completely represented. \n\nThe naming and numbering convention for the hydrometric areas in Great Britain was originally defined by the Inland Water Survey Committee (and first published in the Surface Water Year-Book of Great Britain 1936-37). For Northern Ireland the system was developed by a multi-agency working group in the 1970s (and first published in Surface Water: United Kingdom 1971-73. Note that full citations of those two publications are provided as additional information source. \n\nThis dataset represent the same entities as the IHU Hydrometric Areas of the UK without Coastline, however, the outer boundaries of the units follow coastline published by the Ordnance Survey (Meridian 2), rather than the boundaries of the CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model. ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"abb627a0-1239-487c-a2d6-c3f21274c0e4","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography"],"incomingCitationCount":3,"fullName":["National River Flow Archive"],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchments and Topography","United Kingdom","Great Britain","Northern Ireland","England","Wales","Scotland","hydrometric areas","hydrometry","Water Resources","Hydrology","Rees Section"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","Great Britain","Northern Ireland","England","Wales","Scotland"],"keywordsOther":["hydrometric areas","hydrometry","Water Resources","Hydrology","Rees Section"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The hydrometric areas are based on watershed derived from the Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) elevation grid using an in-house catchment definition program. In Great Britain the coastline corresponds to the OS Meridian2 coastline. In Northern Ireland the boundary and coastline was derived from OS Panorama data in times when Ordnance Survey covered Northern Ireland. All boundaries have been processed to ensure they are topologically correct; there are no gaps or overlaps so every point in the country is allocated to one and only one Hydrometric Area","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1425380978274","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/1957166d-7523-44f4-b279-aa5314163237","10.5285/1957166d-7523-44f4-b279-aa5314163237"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Ministry of Health and Scottish Office (1939) The Surface Water Year-Book of Great Britain 1936-37. His Majesty Stationary Office. London.","Water Data Unit (1978) Surface Water: United Kingdom 1971-1973. Department of the Environment / Scottish Development Department / Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London. 193pp."],"title":"Integrated Hydrological Units of the United Kingdom: Hydrometric Areas with Coastline","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrometric Units (IHU) of the UK. Hydrometric Areas are used to organise river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection in the UK. Hydrometric Areas are either integral river catchments having one or more outlets to the sea..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) comprises five 50 m grids: elevation, surface type, outflow direction, inflow directions and cumulative catchment area. It covers the UK and the areas of the Republic of Ireland that drain into Northern Ireland. It has been derived, using CEH algorithms, from the following OS digital 1:50,000 map data: contours, heighted lake shores, high water line and selected hill-top spot heights (marketed as PANORAMA vectors by OS GB), together with CEH’s digital river network of Great Britain.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"242384d6-ce65-4360-bf4e-3f6b4ed53034","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography","River Flow and Networks"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchments and Topography","River Flow and Networks"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The principal stages in the production of IHDTM were: 1) Heighting the digital rivers by non-linear interpolation between their intersections with contours, lake shores and coastline. Due to positional inconsistencies between some rivers and contours, a small proportion of the rivers have not been heighted. 2) At every point on a 50 m square grid, interpolating between the heighted rivers and the above-listed OS datasets (treating the high water line as a 3 m contour) to obtain an elevation grid that is spatially consistent with the river network. The method used takes a weighted average of elevation estimates obtained from multiple transects which intersect at the point, with the weight for each estimate being based on the confidence in the interpolation. 3) A by-product from the elevation gridding algorithm is the surface type grid. The value at each point is the most significant hydrological type in the 50 m x 50 m square centred on the point, from – in increasing order of significance – land, river, lake and sea. Thus a grid point may lie on land, but be classified as sea or lake in order to ensure the continuity of narrow (sub grid interval) estuaries and lakes within their gridded representation. Rivers in this grid are sometimes missing because the method uses heighted rivers and, as noted in (1) above not all rivers have been heighted. For a more comprehensive grid representation of the rivers, the outflow grid should be used (see (4) below). 4) The outflow grid was derived by (a) representing the digital rivers as a continuous sequence of vectors on a 50m square grid; (b) in each lake, setting the directions at all the contained points so that they lead to the lake outlet; (c) setting the direction at all the other land points by reference to their elevation and the elevations of their eight near-neighbours; the algorithm used was designed to give a sequence of flow directions that follow the true plan direction of steepest slope and therefore did not set every individual point to flow to the neighbour that gave the steepest descent, as this would have led to sequences of points artificially following one of the eight cardinal directions; finally, where necessary, flow was directed uphill to provide continuity from local low points. 5) The inflow directions grid was derived from the outflow grid, and for each point it lists which of its eight near-neighbours flow towards it. The main purpose of this grid is to enable rapid derivation of catchment boundaries using a CEH algorithm. 6) The cumulative catchment area grid was derived from the outflow grid, by recording how many points there are at or upstream of each point ","locations":["POLYGON((-10 49, -10 59, 5 59, 5 49, -10 49))"],"organisation":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/242384d6-ce65-4360-bf4e-3f6b4ed53034"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model [IHDTM]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) comprises five 50 m grids: elevation, surface type, outflow direction, inflow directions and cumulative catchment area. It covers the UK and the areas of the Republic of Ireland that drain into Northern Ireland...."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Dataset of 1753 Pollutant Release Inventory waste water release sites in Scotland [1]. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site such as industrial activity (as defined in the UK Standard Industrial Classification, UKSIC [2]), main polluting activity (as described in the Pollutant Release and Transfer Register, PRTR [3]) and summaries of the pollutant released for each year between 2009 and 2014 as urls to SEPA's Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory (SPRI) Website.\n\n[1] \"Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory\". https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/environmental-data/spri/ Checked 2016-10-03\n[2] \"Business Data & Data Enhancing/Appending\". http://www.uksiccodes.com/ Checked 2016-10-03\n[3] European Union (2006). Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC, Official Journal of the European Union, L 33, 4.2.2006","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"80ff28ac-2244-4267-83bf-870204d3a6ff","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Site Specific Data","Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Non-agricultural Pollution","Site Specific Data","Water Quality"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Unknown","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["Scottish Environmental Protection Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/80ff28ac-2244-4267-83bf-870204d3a6ff"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"SEPA Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory Waste Water Release sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset of 1753 Pollutant Release Inventory waste water release sites in Scotland [1]. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site such as industrial activity (as defined in the UK Standard Industrial..."},{"publicationDate":"2011-11-18T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["A.","D.A.","C.D.","S.J.","D.","C.","B.","I."],"authorFamilyName":["Burden","Norris","Evans","Grant","Williams","Hinton","Callaghan","Pomeroy"],"authorFullName":["Burden, A.","Norris, D.A.","Evans, C.D.","Grant, S.J.","Williams, D.","Hinton, C.","Callaghan, B.","Pomeroy, I."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-1638","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-555X"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"In-lake temperature data for a peatland headwater lake of the Conwy catchment, North Wales are presented from November 2006 until December 2008. The Lake for which the data represents is Llyn Conwy situated on the Migneint blanket bog within Snowdonia National Park. The data is from a temperature string suspended from a buoy anchored above the deepest part of the lake. Temperature is recorded at 2 metre intervals throughout the lake profile from 1 to 19 m. The purpose of this data is to investigate water column stability and to determine when, and to what degree stratification/mixing occurs and to make inferences about the effect of this on productivity, nutrient and chemical cycling. Note: there are gaps in this data set due to equipment/battery failures and/or freezing of the lake surface which meant it was not accessible.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"31b86b6e-0275-48a7-b50f-d4953792199c","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Annette","A.","D.A.","C.D.","S.J.","D.","C.","B.","I."],"familyName":["Burden","Norris","Evans","Grant","Williams","Hinton","Callaghan","Pomeroy"],"fullName":["Burden, A.","Norris, D.A.","Evans, C.D.","Grant, S.J.","Williams, D.","Hinton, C.","Callaghan, B.","Pomeroy, I."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Conwy Catchment","Wales","United Kingdom","lake","limnology"],"keywordsPlace":["Conwy Catchment","Wales","United Kingdom"],"keywordsOther":["lake","limnology"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"In-lake temperature measurements were taken hourly and recorded automatically on to a CR10X data logger. The sensors used were high-precision platinum resistance thermometers (PRTs), encapsulated in a stainless steel sheath. The equipment was accessed via boat bi-monthly to download the data to a laptop which was then transferred on to the CEH shared drive which is in turn backed up each evening. The data was then integrated into a master file along with a diary entry for the visit detailing any relevant information or observations. This metadata was then used to help quality check the raw data, along with plotting the data to identify outliers that may be indicative of equipment failure. ","locations":["POLYGON((-4.031 52.944, -4.031 53.31, -3.592 53.31, -3.592 52.944, -4.031 52.944))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-1638","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-555X"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1318602965390","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7bb6c7df-7630-4621-a0d4-eacc3ec2202b","10.5285/7bb6c7df-7630-4621-a0d4-eacc3ec2202b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Conwy catchment - Llyn Conwy water temperature profile data (2006-2008)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"In-lake temperature data for a peatland headwater lake of the Conwy catchment, North Wales are presented from November 2006 until December 2008. The Lake for which the data represents is Llyn Conwy situated on the Migneint blanket bog within Snowdonia National Park...."},{"publicationDate":"2013-07-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.","M.","N.","I.","R."],"authorFamilyName":["Leach","Neal","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"authorFullName":["Leach, D.","Neal, M.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Discrete data for major ions and nutrients in river water for 13 sites in the Humber catchment over the periods 1993 to 1997 and 1996 to 1997 and for 3 sites from the Tweed catchment over the period 1994 to 1997. Ions and nutrients measured were: Ammonia, Calcium (dissolved), Magnesium (dissolved), Potassium (dissolved), Sodium (dissolved), Bromide-ion, Carbon (organic dissolved), Chloride-ion, Nitrate, Nitrite, Phosphorus (soluble reactive), Phosphorus (total dissolved), Silicate (reactive dissolved), Sulphate, Carbon (organic particulate), Nitrogen (particulate), Phosphorus (total). Sites were sampled at regular weekly intervals and more intermittently during high flows (on average an extra sampling once a month per site). Samples were obtained using a wide neck PTFE bottle in a plastic covered bottle carrier (lowered from bridges where possible otherwise collected by immersing sample bottle by hand in the water as near the main flow as possible). Samples were filtered through Whatman 0.45um sterile membrane filters immediately on return to laboratory. Samples stored in sterilin tubes in the dark at 40C and analysed by Dionex DX100 ion chromatography system. Silicate reactive dissolved and Chloride-ion concentrations were determined by automated colourimetry and dissolved organic carbon concentrations were determined using a TOCsin II aqueous carbon analyser. Some samples on the River Aire were collected using EPIC automatic samplers. The analysis was carried out by members of the analytical chemistry section at York University (from April 1994 until November 1996) and at Wallingford Institute of Hydrology (September 1993 to April 1994 and December 1996 to April 1997), as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS).","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"c7caf4ec-5143-4131-b095-2a7036b4ef17","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Matt","D.","M.","N.","I.","R."],"familyName":["Fry","Leach","Neal","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"fullName":["Fry, M.","Leach, D.","Neal, M.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd","Calcium","Magnesium","Potassium","Sodium","Bromide","Silicate","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","nitrogen","sulphate","phosphorus","nitrite","nitrate","carbon","chloride","ammonia","water quality","Water quality"],"keywordsPlace":["Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd"],"keywordsOther":["Calcium","Magnesium","Potassium","Sodium","Bromide","Silicate","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","nitrogen","sulphate","phosphorus","nitrite","nitrate","carbon","chloride","ammonia","water quality","Water quality"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"For the major ion determinations, quality control standards were included with the samples during analysis. Standards were periodically sent to the analytical chemistry at the Institute of Hydrology (Wallingford) for comparison. Spiked samples prepared by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology (East Stoke) were also analysed occasionally as part of inter-laboratory comparison studies. The lowest quotable values were taken as five times the detection level and variables were rounded to the nearest 0.05 mg/l for Bromide, 0.1 mg/l for Nitrite, 0.2 mg/l for Phosphate, Sodium, Ammonium, Potassium, Magnesium. 0.5 mg/l for Nitrate and Calcium, and 1 mg/l for Chloride and Sulphate. For Carbon organic dissolved, Chloride-ion and Silicate reactive dissolved, the lowest quotable values were taken as 2% of the highest calibration standard and both variables were rounded to 1% of the highest calibration standard. A zip file containing box-and-whisker plots for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site is available to enable prospective users to understand data quality.","locations":["POLYGON((-2.75 53.1, -2.75 55.8, -0.72 55.8, -0.72 53.1, -2.75 53.1))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1373029845405","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/4482fa14-aee2-4c7f-9c62-a08dc9704051","10.5285/4482fa14-aee2-4c7f-9c62-a08dc9704051"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Major ion and nutrient data from rivers [LOIS]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Discrete data for major ions and nutrients in river water for 13 sites in the Humber catchment over the periods 1993 to 1997 and 1996 to 1997 and for 3 sites from the Tweed catchment over the period 1994 to 1997. Ions and nutrients measured were: Ammonia, Calcium (dissolved),..."},{"authorAffiliation":["Met Office"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Evaporation and soil moisture deficit for the UK calculated by MO using meteorological observations. The output can be for a single site or as averaged over 40 x 40 km grid which cover the UK. The data can be supplied at daily, weekly or monthly time resolution. ","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"b9155463-ac86-4e19-a24f-57cef6b79505","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","Time Series","National","Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"MORECS evapotranspiration and soil moisture deficit is calculated from daily values of hours of sunshine, air temperature, vapour pressure, wind speed and rainfall. For further details see Hough and Jones (1997). For further details see [1]\n\n[1] Hough, M. N. and Jones, R. J. A.: The United Kingdom Meteorological Office rainfall and evaporation calculation system: MORECS version 2.0-an overview, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 227-239, doi:10.5194/hess-1-227-1997, 1997. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["Met Office","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b9155463-ac86-4e19-a24f-57cef6b79505"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"state":"published","title":"Meteorological Office Rainfall and Evaporation Calculation System (MORECS version 2.0) ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Evaporation and soil moisture deficit for the UK calculated by MO using meteorological observations. The output can be for a single site or as averaged over 40 x 40 km grid which cover the UK. The data can be supplied at daily, weekly or monthly time resolution. "},{"publicationDate":"2012-11-30T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"EA Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) Boundaries are reference boundaries defining areas where technical assesment on future water availability and demand has been undertaken. The technical assessemtn helps identify where water may be available for future use but also where water resource demands may be impacting the water balacence. The CAMS boundaries should be used on a national (England and Wales) scale to show the geographical distribution of CAMS and are not suitable for detailed technical assessments. The boundaries may be subject to change based on the Environment Agency's technical and catchment understanding. The data was created in 2009.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"c75c0b83-6b84-4462-a4b5-637484d9f339","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography","Water Use"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchment","Catchments and Topography","Water Use"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","locations":["POLYGON((-6.4526 49.864, -6.4526 55.812, 1.7675 55.812, 1.7675 49.864, -6.4526 49.864))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/c75c0b83-6b84-4462-a4b5-637484d9f339"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) Boundaries","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"EA Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) Boundaries are reference boundaries defining areas where technical assesment on future water availability and demand has been undertaken. The technical assessemtn helps identify where water may be available for future..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["Data for DTC Phase I from Hampshire Avon DTC Consortium"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water quality and freshwater ecology.\n\nDatasets are available from the DTC data archive with detailed information on monitoring undertaken and protocols used, but in general consist of:\n\nEcological monitoring:\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Deposited Fine-grained Sediment Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (reach-averaged masses of fine-grained sediment in the stream bed at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Diatom Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (diatom taxa recorded from samples taken at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (macroinvertebrate taxa, and their abundance, found in each sample taken at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macrophyte Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (list of plant taxa found, with an areal cover estimate, and associated environmental data in each surveyed reach at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n\nHydrological and water quality monitoring: \nBankside (i.e in situe) and laboratory analysis of hydrology and water quality at 9 locations across the catchments. Bankside datasets generally include 15 minute river flow, turbidity (NTU), water temperature and dissolved oxygen, though some sites also record pH, and others include rainfall as well as chlorophylls, conductivity, ammonium, nitrate, total phosphorus (TP) and total reactive phosphorus (TRP) . Laboratory analyses generally include daily samples analysed for nutrient fractions / species.\n\nHampshire Avon DTC sites:\n- Burracott, Neet catchment\n- Ebble downstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n- Ebble upstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (includes rainfall)\n- Sem at Cool's Cottage, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Sem at Priors Farm, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Kingston Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Brixton Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n\nTamar DTC sites:\n- Caudworthy Water at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment:\n- Winnacott Bridge at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment (no bankside hydrology and water quality)\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Catchment","Time Series","Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Biological Quality","Water Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Protocols for water quality monitoring, and links to descriptions or publications for the ecological monitoring methods are available via the DTC data pages provide in the online resource links.","locations":["POLYGON((-4.679 50.237, -4.679 51.341, -1.515 51.341, -1.515 50.237, -4.679 50.237))"],"organisation":["Rothamsted Research"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrology and ecological monitoring data from the Hampshire Avon and Tamar (2011 - 2014) [DTC project] ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-01-15T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["The James Hutton Institute"],"authorGivenName":["Helen","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"authorFamilyName":["Watson","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Stutter","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"authorFullName":["Watson, H.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP), nitrate (NO3-N), ammonium (NH4-N) and suspended sediments (SS); water chemistry measurements are in units of mg l-1 for all determinands. Sampling for water chemistry took place at a weekly frequency between 2000 and the end of 2003, with some daily sampling during rainfall events. Daily samples were then collected between February 2004 and June 2005. After June 2005, infrequent irregular sampling took place, with fewer determinands. Mean daily flow, in m3s-1, was also recorded.\n\nThe Tarland Burn is a tributary of the River Dee (northeast Scotland). The samples were collected at Coull (WGS84 57.111, -2.810; OSGB 351050, 802540). ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"23d98eb0-d0d9-420b-8ffc-6a88ee230428","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Helen","Marc","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"familyName":["Watson","Stutter","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"fullName":["Watson, H.","Stutter, M.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","River Flow and Networks","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment","Coull","Pollution"],"keywordsPlace":["Coull"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Water chemistry data: Sub-daily sampling took place during storms during 2004 and 2005, with 2 to 6 samples per day. Sub-daily data were converted to daily means. Samples were collected via a combination of grab sampling (pre 2004 and post 2005) and auto-sampler. Suspended sediment concentrations were determined gravimetrically on filter papers. Filtrates were analysed for total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), nitrate and ammonium. Unfiltered samples were manually digested by a persulphate autoclave procedure, then analysed as molybdate reactive P to give total P (TP). Particulate P (PP) was calculated as the difference between TP and TDP. Details of sampling protocol, autosampler set-up and analytical methods are given in [1] [2]\n\nDischarge data: Daily mean flow was derived from 15 minute discharge data, with a 'day' classed as 9am - 8:45am, for compatibility with Met Office rainfall data. The 15 minute discharge data was derived from stage information.\n\n[1] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water and particulate N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.048\n[2] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of streamwater phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.045","locations":["POLYGON((-2.812 57.11, -2.812 57.112, -2.808 57.112, -2.808 57.11, -2.812 57.11))"],"organisation":["The James Hutton Institute","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f","10.5285/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water particulate and dissolved N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology, 350(3-4), 187-202","Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of stream water phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology, 350(34), 203-214"],"title":"Discharge and water chemistry measurements from Tarland Burn at Coull (Scotland) (2000-2010) ","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP),..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling network includes 230 sites, which are mainly located at the tidal limits of major rivers or at the points of confluence of significant tributaries. The information held within the HMS includes data on: oxygen and ammonia, nutrients, list II metals and pesticides. Annual mean concentrations have been calculated for each HMS site. The data show the annual averages of the site means in each region, with each site given equal weight irrespective of the number of samples taken - an average of all the samples would give a greater weight to the sites at which samples are most frequently taken. In order to give an indication of the range of values at different sites within each region, figures are also given for the maximum and minimum site mean for each region. The data also includes for the UK average, the 10th percentile and the 90th percentile of the site means for the whole of the UK. For each determinand in each year and the 10-percentile and the 90-percentile of the site means in each region.\nThe Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) was established to provide an archive of water quality data for the UK. It is used to provide information for international obligations, including the long-term trends of some determinands and the estimation of riverborne input of selected determinands to the sea.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","National","River Reach","Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Chemical and Physico-chemical data is collected via site-specific surveys","locations":["POLYGON((-6.236 49.943, -6.236 55.816, 2.072 55.816, 2.072 49.943, -6.236 49.943))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme Summary Data ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-09-17T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["F.K.","G.","P.","R.","H.","M."],"authorFamilyName":["Edwards","Webb","Scarlett","Baker","Vincent","Bowes"],"authorFullName":["Edwards, F.K.","Webb, G.","Scarlett, P.","Baker, R.","Vincent, H.","Bowes, M."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-6663","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-8158","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-1934"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Data comprise species level descriptions of macroinvertebrate communities and habitat descriptions from wadeable rivers of the Thames catchment, in the United Kingdom (UK), sampled over three seasons in the years 2009 - 2010. \n","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"2722f92e-79cc-4333-8bb0-396903fd8e5d","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["F.K.","G.","P.","R.","H.","M.","Francois"],"familyName":["Edwards","Webb","Scarlett","Baker","Vincent","Bowes"],"fullName":["Edwards, F.K.","Webb, G.","Scarlett, P.","Baker, R.","Vincent, H.","Bowes, M.","Edwards, F."],"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Biological Quality","Water quality","Environmental survey","river","invertebrate"],"keywordsTheme":["Water quality","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["river","invertebrate"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The waterbodies studied are rivers of the Thames catchment, UK. Dataset comprises eighteen sampling sites, sampling took place in Autumn 2009, Spring 2010 and Autumn 2010. Not all sites were sampled on all occasions (see supporting documentation).\n\nMacroinvertebrates were sampled using a 1mm mesh kick net following the RIvPACS field protocol as described in: Murray-Bligh, J. A. D., Furse, M. T., Jones, F. H., Gunn, R. J. M., Dines, R. A. & Wright, J. F. (1997) Procedure for collecting and analysing macro-invertebrate samples for RIVPACS. Environment Agency and Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Bristol, UK\n\nSite variables (depth, width, substrate cover, macrophyte cover) were also recorded as described in the above document.\n\nSamples were washed into plastic sample bags, labelled and preserved with a 4% formaldehyde solution in the field. In the laboratory, samples were washed through a 500 μm sieve and all macroinvertebrates were picked from the samples and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible, usually species. Valid taxonomic names and unique taxon identification codes were provided in: Davies, C. and Edwards, F.K. (2011) Code list for recording the macroinvertebrates in freshwater in the British Isles. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford.\n\nData entry was validated by crosschecking data print outs with laboratory sheets.\n\nMap variables were derived for those point locations using the Intelligent River Network (Version 17), which was first described in: Dawson, F.H., Hornby, D.D. and Hilton, J. (2002), A method for the automated extraction of environmental variables to help the classification of rivers in Britain. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 12: 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.534\n\nSample identifiers:\nSamples are defined by unique combination of the site code and the sample date. A key to site codes is provided by downloading supporting documentation.\n\nColumn headings in taxon dataset:\nColumn\tContent\nA\tSite code\nB\tSample date\nC\tSeason (A, autumn; S, spring)\nD\tTaxon code as per Davies and Edwards (2011)\nE\tTaxon name as per Davies and Edwards (2011)\nF\tLife stage (L, larva/nymph; P, pupa; A, adult; U, life stage not relevant)\nG\tAbundance in sample","locations":["POLYGON((-2.014 51.39, -2.014 51.929, 0.592 51.929, 0.592 51.39, -2.014 51.39))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-6663","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-8158","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-1934"],"organisation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/5700501d-feb4-445d-aa08-81a158e54bac","10.5285/5700501d-feb4-445d-aa08-81a158e54bac"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Macroinvertebrates of the river Thames catchments UK: taxon data","topic":["0/Water quality/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise species level descriptions of macroinvertebrate communities and habitat descriptions from wadeable rivers of the Thames catchment, in the United Kingdom (UK), sampled over three seasons in the years 2009 - 2010. \n"},{"publicationDate":"2015-02-03T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["IHU Areas without Coastline"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["F.","M.","H."],"authorFamilyName":["Kral","Fry","Dixon"],"authorFullName":["Kral, F.","Fry, M.","Dixon, H."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. Hydrometric Areas are either integral river catchments having one or more outlets to the sea or tidal estuary, or they may include several contiguous river catchments having topographical similarity but separate tidal outlets. Hydrometric Areas are the coarsest units of the IHU in terms of spatial resolution. This dataset represents the same entities as the Hydrometric Areas with Coastline. The coastline of Hydrometric Areas without Coastline follows the boundaries of the CEH Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model, from which IHU were derived, while the coastline used in Hydrometric Areas with Coastline was derived from Ordnance Survey data. The Hydrometric Areas without Coastline currently covers Great Britain only as no dataset with river geometries and names with suitable detail is available for Northern Ireland.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"b6e067e2-adc3-42d5-b8cb-765fc6f322f1","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Matt","F.","M.","H."],"familyName":["Fry","Kral","Dixon"],"fullName":["Fry, M.","Kral, F.","Dixon, H."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchments and Topography","United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland","Hydrology","hydrology","watershed","catchment"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland"],"keywordsTheme":["Hydrology"],"keywordsOther":["hydrology","watershed","catchment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The main inputs for development of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK were data held by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Specifically, the cumulative catchment area raster and outflow raster from the Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) [1]. The vast majority of the watercourse names come from the subset of CEH UK river centreline network enriched by names from Ordnance Survey 1:50K Gazetteer [2]. Some names were obtained from or verified using other readily available sources like OpenStreetMap (openstreetmap.org) and WikiPedia (wikipedia.org). Bespoke FORTRAN functions, part of the CEH Flood Estimation Handbook code set, were used for catchment delineation. These functions enable sensible interlocking catchments boundaries to be created for the whole IHDTM surface. The option that does not leave gaps between catchments was specified [1]. Except for the catchment delineation, ArcGIS was used as the main GIS platform. Custom Python code was developed to drive the whole process and to perform hierarchical and network tasks. The full name of each IHU Section was derived from three rivers defining the section: the largest (in terms of cumulative catchment area) inflowing river other than the main river in the Section, the main river in the Section, and the largest river flowing into the downstream Section. If no such inflows exist, words'Source', 'Sea', or the name of the main river in the downstream Section are used as appropriate. A similar approach was adopted for IHU Group names, although group names were edited manually to a great extent to ensure they are simple and readily understood. \n\n[1] Morris, D.G. and Flavin, R.W. 1990. A Digital Terrain Model for Hydrology. Proc 4th Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Zurich, 1, 250-262.\n\n[2] Moore R V, Morris D G and Flavin R W, 1994. Sub-set of UK digital 1:50,000 scale river centreline network. NERC, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1425380947383","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/3a4e94fc-4c68-47eb-a217-adee2a6b02b3","10.5285/3a4e94fc-4c68-47eb-a217-adee2a6b02b3"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["National River Flow Archive website providing access to river flow data downloads as well as contact information for the NRFA enquirers service which provides other datasets and monthly, annual and occasional reports on river flow conditions."],"supplementalName":["National River Flow Archive website"],"title":"Integrated Hydrological Units of the United Kingdom: Hydrometric Areas without Coastline","topic":["0/Hydrology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. Hydrometric Areas are either integral river catchments having one..."}],"facets":[{"fieldName":"resourceType","displayName":"Resource type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Case Study","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=resourceType%7CCase+Study","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Dataset","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=resourceType%7CDataset","active":false,"count":122},{"name":"Model (UKCEH)","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=resourceType%7CModel+%28UKCEH%29","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impCaMMPIssues","displayName":"CaMMP Issues","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Climate Change","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CClimate+Change","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Confidence levels","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CConfidence+levels","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Cost Effectiveness","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CCost+Effectiveness","active":false,"count":3},{"name":"Management outcome","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome","active":false,"count":12},{"name":"Other Services","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7COther+Services","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Pollution Source","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CPollution+Source","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Transferability","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CTransferability","active":false,"count":13}]},{"fieldName":"impDataType","displayName":"Data Type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Geospatial / Map","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impDataType%7CGeospatial+%2F+Map","active":false,"count":69},{"name":"Tabular","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impDataType%7CTabular","active":false,"count":42},{"name":"Time Series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impDataType%7CTime+Series","active":false,"count":37},{"name":"Time series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impDataType%7CTime+series","active":false,"count":5}]},{"fieldName":"impScale","displayName":"Scale","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational","active":true,"count":47},{"name":"Farm","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CFarm","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Field","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CField","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"National","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach","active":true,"count":93},{"name":"Plot","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CPlot","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Regional","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"River Reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+Reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"River reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CNational","active":true,"count":10},{"name":"catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7Ccatchment","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"national","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7Cnational","active":false,"count":3}]},{"fieldName":"impTopic","displayName":"Topic","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Administration Units","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CAdministration+Units","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Agricultural Practices","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CAgricultural+Practices","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Air Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CAir+Quality","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Biodiversity","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CBiodiversity","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Catchments and Topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+Topography","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"Catchments and topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+topography","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Climate Scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+Scenarios","active":false,"count":8},{"name":"Climate scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+scenarios","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Geology","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CGeology","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+Gas+Fluxes","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Greenhouse gas fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+gas+fluxes","active":false,"count":5},{"name":"Land Cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Cover","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Land Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Use","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Land cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CLand+cover","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Land use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CLand+use","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural Pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+Pollution","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+pollution","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"River Flow and Networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+Flow+and+Networks","active":false,"count":17},{"name":"River flow and networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+flow+and+networks","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Site Specific Data","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CSite+Specific+Data","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Soil","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CSoil","active":false,"count":18},{"name":"Water Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Quality","active":false,"count":44},{"name":"Water Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Use","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Water quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CWater+quality","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Weather","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impTopic%7CWeather","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impWaterPollutant","displayName":"Water Pollutant","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Biological Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+Quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Biological quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Faecal Indicator Organisms","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CFaecal+Indicator+Organisms","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Metaldehyde","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CMetaldehyde","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Nitrogen","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":false,"count":33},{"name":"Phosphorous","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorous","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Phosphorus","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus","active":false,"count":30},{"name":"Sediment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment","active":false,"count":17}]}],"order":"asc"}