{"numFound":32,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?page=2&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","results":[{"publicationDate":"2017-02-16T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["ADAS UK Ltd"],"authorGivenName":["R.","S.","L.","D."],"authorFamilyName":["Gooday","Anthony","Calrow","Harris","Skirvin"],"authorFullName":["Gooday, R.","Anthony, S.","Calrow, L.","Harris, D.","Skirvin, D."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/006d11e04"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of annual loads of phosphorus, sediment, nitrogen and faecal coliform from non-agricultural sources to rivers in Scotland, reported at Water Framework Directive (WFD) catchment scale. The sources of pollutants include: urban, woodland, montane areas, river bank erosion, septic tanks and sewage treatment works. Loads are estimated based upon available data (e.g. septic tank licences) and modelling (bank erosion). The values specify phosphorous, nitrogen or sediment losses in kilograms per year and faecal coliform in 10^6 colony forming units (cfu) per year.\n\n","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"fac703a1-e65f-44fe-a3e5-ca4014fefb53","impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Faecal Indicator Organisms"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Richard","R.","S.","L.","D."],"familyName":["Gooday","Anthony","Calrow","Harris","Skirvin"],"fullName":["Gooday, R.","Anthony, S.","Calrow, L.","Harris, D.","Skirvin, D."],"keyword":["Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Faecal Indicator Organisms","Pollution","water quality","river","faecal bacterium","sediment","nitrogen","phosphorus","pollution"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"keywordsOther":["water quality","river","faecal bacterium","sediment","nitrogen","phosphorus","pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Non-agricultural pollutant emissions were calculated for each WFD waterbody on the basis of tabulated discharges and empirical models. Losses from septic tanks were derived from SEPA licensing records and per capita coefficients, whilst losses from sewage treatment works were derived from consented dry weather flows and average concentrations from compliance monitoring. Losses from urban areas were calculated using the Event Mean Concentration model of [1] whilst montane and woodland losses were calculated using the PLUS and MARS models ([2] and [3] respectively). Losses from bank erosion were calculated using a simple index of bank erosion that was calibrated against available sediment tracing data.\n\n[1] Mitchell, G. Lockyer, J. and McDonald, A.T. (2001) Pollution hazard from urban nonpoint sources: a GIS-model to support strategic environmental planning in the UK. Technical Report, School of Geography, University of Leeds, UK.\n[2] Donnelly, D., Booth, P., Ferrier, R. and Futter, M. 2011. Phosphorus Land Use and Slope (PLUS+) Model. User Guide and Computer Code. Report to SEPA, Scotland, UK. 39 pp. Availalble from http://www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/Plus+%20User%20Guide%20-%20v1_6.pdf\n[3] Hughes, G., Lord, E., Wilson, L., Gooday, R. and Anthony, S. (2008) Updating previous estimates of the load and source apportionment of nitrogen to waters in the United Kingdom. Defra project WQ0111, final Report, 112 pp.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["ADAS UK Ltd","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/eb73ca31-7eb9-479c-96be-6063e29c8a7f","10.5285/eb73ca31-7eb9-479c-96be-6063e29c8a7f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/006d11e04","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["The WFD catchments are not published by SEPA yet however, it is SEPA's intention to add the WFD catchment dataset to its Environmental data page. In the meantime, the WFD catchment shapefile can be requested from SEPA"],"supplementalName":["Water Framework  Directive (WFD) catchments for Scotland"],"title":"Non-agricultural pollution to rivers in Scotland ","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of annual loads of phosphorus, sediment, nitrogen and faecal coliform from non-agricultural sources to rivers in Scotland, reported at Water Framework Directive (WFD) catchment scale. The sources of pollutants include: urban, woodland, montane areas, river..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Despite the uncertainty in future climate and land use, large-scale measures put in place today to improve water quality are likely to remain effective in the future in northeast Scotland. Dynamic models can provide useful indications of the likely lag time between the implementation of measures and improvements in water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"7f45279b-5818-4667-8a6e-3439f26c6e44","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Time series"],"impScale":["River reach","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Climate scenarios"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Time series","Sediment","River reach","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","Management outcome","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchment"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 4: Effectiveness of pollution control measures under scenarios of future climate and land cover change at the catchment scale.  ","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"Despite the uncertainty in future climate and land use, large-scale measures put in place today to improve water quality are likely to remain effective in the future in northeast Scotland. Dynamic models can provide useful indications of the likely lag time between..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["Data for DTC Phase I from Hampshire Avon DTC Consortium"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water quality and freshwater ecology.\n\nDatasets are available from the DTC data archive with detailed information on monitoring undertaken and protocols used, but in general consist of:\n\nEcological monitoring:\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Deposited Fine-grained Sediment Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (reach-averaged masses of fine-grained sediment in the stream bed at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Diatom Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (diatom taxa recorded from samples taken at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (macroinvertebrate taxa, and their abundance, found in each sample taken at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macrophyte Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (list of plant taxa found, with an areal cover estimate, and associated environmental data in each surveyed reach at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n\nHydrological and water quality monitoring: \nBankside (i.e in situe) and laboratory analysis of hydrology and water quality at 9 locations across the catchments. Bankside datasets generally include 15 minute river flow, turbidity (NTU), water temperature and dissolved oxygen, though some sites also record pH, and others include rainfall as well as chlorophylls, conductivity, ammonium, nitrate, total phosphorus (TP) and total reactive phosphorus (TRP) . Laboratory analyses generally include daily samples analysed for nutrient fractions / species.\n\nHampshire Avon DTC sites:\n- Burracott, Neet catchment\n- Ebble downstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n- Ebble upstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (includes rainfall)\n- Sem at Cool's Cottage, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Sem at Priors Farm, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Kingston Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Brixton Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n\nTamar DTC sites:\n- Caudworthy Water at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment:\n- Winnacott Bridge at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment (no bankside hydrology and water quality)\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Catchment","Time Series","Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Biological Quality","Water Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Protocols for water quality monitoring, and links to descriptions or publications for the ecological monitoring methods are available via the DTC data pages provide in the online resource links.","locations":["POLYGON((-4.679 50.237, -4.679 51.341, -1.515 51.341, -1.515 50.237, -4.679 50.237))"],"organisation":["Rothamsted Research"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrology and ecological monitoring data from the Hampshire Avon and Tamar (2011 - 2014) [DTC project] ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying software implementation of the Polyscape framework. \nThe model was developed through work at Pontbren, exploring impacts of land-use on flooding. Landcover types providing mitigation from flash-flood risk and diffuse pollution through enhanced infiltration (e.g. woodlands and wetlands); these are mapped as providing a service. LUCI then simulates flow and nutrient accumulation over the landscape, with areas routing through these mitigating features mapped as “mitigated” i.e. not hydrologically connected to the stream. Hydrologically connected areas of the landscape with large accumulations of water or pollutants are mapped as having potential to benefit from changes inland cover or management which could provide mitigating services. Hydrological routing is also used to map annual flow and average loading and concentration of N and P at each point on the river network. For agricultural production and carbon, LUCI compares the services provided by the current utilisation of the landscape to estimates of its potential capability. For each service, the model then processes this data to identify areas where change might improve service provision, and where current service provision is good or lacks potential to improve. Trade-offs between outputs for the individual ecosystem services are modelled and mapped, with an option for the user to preferentially weight services of higher importance.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","Plot","National","Field","Farm","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","River flow and networks","Regional","Plot","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Field","Farm","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"LUCI  (Land Utilisation & Capability Indicator)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The impacts of the suite of Countryside Stewardship options were reductions in national agricultural pollution of over 6% (nitrate) and 10% (phosphorus). Accounting for non-agricultural sources of pollution reduced the net overall impact of the options to 4% (nitrate) and 3% (phosphorus). There would also be a net reduction in GHG emissions from agriculture.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"a426ddf1-fd15-40ae-9897-5bf73c610df0","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Cost Effectiveness"],"impDataType":["Tabular","Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Sediment","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Geospatial / Map","Cost Effectiveness"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 2: Effectiveness of land management policies and agri-environment interventions for reducing pollutant loads and maintaining environmental quality at the national scale. ","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"The impacts of the suite of Countryside Stewardship options were reductions in national agricultural pollution of over 6% (nitrate) and 10% (phosphorus). Accounting for non-agricultural sources of pollution reduced the net overall impact of the options to 4% (nitrate)..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-11-13T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Wensum Alliance"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Continuous measures of hydrochemical parameters from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, recorded between 2010 and 2015. Monitoring equipment was installed at 7 sites (aka monitoring kiosk A, B, C, D, E, F, M) in this catchment to capture hydrochemical parameters at 30-minute resolution. YSI 6600 multi-parameter sonde measures temperature (degree Celsius), turbidity (nephelometric turbidity unit), electrical conductivity (microsiemens per centimetre), chlorophyll-a (micrograms per litre), pH and dissolved oxygen (percent and milligrams per litre) . Stage height (metres) is measured by a pressure transducer housed in a stilling well. Flow (cubic metres per second) is estimated by a Doppler flow meter, the Sontek Argonaut. Analogues (nutrients) are measured in 2 of the sites (monitoring kiosk E and F) which include total phosphorus (milligrams per litre) and total reactive phosphorus (milligrams per litre) are measured in 2 of the sites (monitoring kiosk E and F) using a Hach Lange Phosphax Sigma analyser, nitrate (milligrams per litre) is measured using a Nitratax SC optical probe.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"501efc7b-5a66-4872-ac51-05d44fd5e020","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The Wensum DTC has a monitoring network installed to measure meteorological, hydrological and hydrochemical parameters in target sub-catchments. This statement aims to describe the in-situ monitoring equipment, methods and protocols performed on our data before it is published on the archive. Quality assurance and quality control procedures Quality assurance (QA) procedures are followed during data collection, detailed with our monitoring equipment. Regular maintenance activities are carried out at a weekly frequency and involve cleaning of flow-through cells, clearing of in-channel vegetation and debris where stage is monitored and cleaning of rain gauges. All field work and maintenance activities are entered into maintenance logs for each site, which are used during data quality control (QC) procedures. QC procedures include the validation of high-frequency nutrient data using point samples in the Blackwater sub catchment. These samples are analysed in laboratories following standard methods. Inter-laboratory comparisons are used to check consistency in analytical procedures between sub-catchments. QC procedures also include the identification of errors in all data sets. Errors flagged as critical include: periods of maintenance when data may be unrepresentative; equipment of power failures; or data below limits of detection. On-site visits by field staff are recorded in a maintenance log which is checked against the data during the quality control (QC) post-processing. Any data likely to be disturbed by the routine field work are removed, along with any known periods of downtime, hence some of the data is not included and there may be time breaks in the files accessible on the archive. The Wensum DTC’s sampling kiosks monitor many hydrochemical parameters at a 30 minute resolution. Samples are also analysed less frequently at the University of East Anglia’s laboratory, all using standard laboratory methods. The monitoring equipment used is detailed below: Pressure transducer – Measures stage height. Sontek Argonaut – Doppler meter which measures stage height and infers flow from velocity and pre-programmed stream cross section. Sontek IQ – Doppler meter which measures stage height and infers flow from velocity and pre-programmed stream cross section. YSI 6600 series multi-parameter sonde - Measures water temperature, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonium, turbidity and chlorophyll-a. Hach Lange Nitratax SC optical probe which measures N concentration. The Nitratax sensors are calibrated every 3 months using a standard solution. Hach Lange Sigmatax and Phosphax Sigma analyser (kiosk E and F only) - Measures total phosphorus and total reactive phosphorus colorimetrically using homogenised sample from Sigmatax. The Phosphax Sigma is automatically cleaned and calibrated daily using reagents that are replaced every 3 months. Routine laboratory water sample data Water samples are collected at the monitoring kiosk’s intake pipes and are analysed at the University of East Anglia’s laboratory using standard laboratory practices. ISCO water sample data Automatic ISCO samplers are installed at monitoring kiosks to measure hydrochemical properties of storm derived water. These are analysed at the University of East Anglia.\n","locations":["POLYGON((1.0945972 52.767171, 1.0945972 52.803219, 1.1731899 52.803219, 1.1731899 52.767171, 1.0945972 52.767171))"],"organisation":["Wensum Alliance"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/501efc7b-5a66-4872-ac51-05d44fd5e020"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Continuous measuring of hydrochemical parameters (2010-2015) [Wensum DTC]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Continuous measures of hydrochemical parameters from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, recorded between 2010 and 2015. Monitoring equipment was installed at 7 sites (aka monitoring kiosk A, B, C, D, E, F, M) in this catchment to capture hydrochemical..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-11-05T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of Birmingham"],"authorGivenName":["D.","P.","R.","E.","I.","J.","C.I.","N."],"authorFamilyName":["Leach","Henville","Wyatt","Hewitt","Morrissey","Weller","Tindall","Bachiller-Jareno"],"authorFullName":["Leach, D.","Henville, P.","Wyatt, R.","Hewitt, E.","Morrissey, I.","Weller, J.","Tindall, C.I.","Bachiller-Jareno, N."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/03angcq70"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Rainwater alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients data from the Frome Piddle; Pang Lambourn and Tern catchments, recorded between 2004 and 2006. Rainwater samples were collected fortnightly at seven sites in these catchments and analysed for Alkalinity pH 4.5, Ammonia, Chloride-ion, Conductivity 20 °C, Nitrate, pH, Phosphorus soluble reactive (SRP), Silicate reactive dissolved (SRD) and Sulphate. The samples were collected as part of the NERC funded Lowland Catchment Research (LOCAR) Programme to provide comparable baseline rainwater chemistry data across the LOCAR catchments.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"6a237b76-bee9-4a75-a237-04841cc36d5e","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Nuria ","D.","P.","R.","E.","I.","J.","C.I.","N."],"familyName":["Bachiller Jareno","Leach","Henville","Wyatt","Hewitt","Morrissey","Weller","Tindall","Bachiller-Jareno"],"fullName":["Bachiller Jareno, N.","Leach, D.","Henville, P.","Wyatt, R.","Hewitt, E.","Morrissey, I.","Weller, J.","Tindall, C.I.","Bachiller-Jareno, N."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Water quality","The Lowland Catchment Research Programme","LOCAR","rainwater"],"keywordsTheme":["Water quality"],"keywordsOther":["The Lowland Catchment Research Programme","LOCAR","rainwater"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The rainwater collector was brought back to the lab by the Catchment Service Team in that catchment and used to fill a number of bottles supplied by Thames Water Laboratory. Samples for pH and alkalinity readings were poured into a glass bottle. Samples for Phosphorus soluble reactive were filtered. Unfiltered samples were used for the rest of the determinands. Samples were then sent to Thames Water for analysis. They used the Seal discrete analyser to determine values for Alkalinity pH 4.5, Ammonia, Chloride-ion, Nitrate, Phosphorus soluble reactive (SRP), Silicate reactive dissolved (SRD) and Sulphate. pH and Conductivity probes were used for those two determinands. A duplicate and a QC sample were sent each week to Thames Water to compare results obtained by the laboratories. The data were quality controlled by Thames Water. The data from the Frome Piddle catchment do not have a time associated with them. The time was not recorded when the rainwater collector was brought back from the field. In the dataset this is represented by the value 00:00. A zip file containing box-and-whisker plots for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site is available to enable prospective users of the data to understand data quality. ","locations":["POLYGON((-3 50.5, -3 53.2, -0.8 53.2, -0.8 50.5, -3 50.5))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of Birmingham","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1426780628758","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/274b541c-ee28-4041-8d3a-be5e970cd74e","10.5285/274b541c-ee28-4041-8d3a-be5e970cd74e"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/03angcq70","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Field measurements of alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients in rainwater (2004-2006) [LOCAR]","topic":["0/Water quality/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Rainwater alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients data from the Frome Piddle; Pang Lambourn and Tern catchments, recorded between 2004 and 2006. Rainwater samples were collected fortnightly at seven sites in these catchments and analysed for Alkalinity..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling network includes 230 sites, which are mainly located at the tidal limits of major rivers or at the points of confluence of significant tributaries. The information held within the HMS includes data on: oxygen and ammonia, nutrients, list II metals and pesticides. Annual mean concentrations have been calculated for each HMS site. The data show the annual averages of the site means in each region, with each site given equal weight irrespective of the number of samples taken - an average of all the samples would give a greater weight to the sites at which samples are most frequently taken. In order to give an indication of the range of values at different sites within each region, figures are also given for the maximum and minimum site mean for each region. The data also includes for the UK average, the 10th percentile and the 90th percentile of the site means for the whole of the UK. For each determinand in each year and the 10-percentile and the 90-percentile of the site means in each region.\nThe Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) was established to provide an archive of water quality data for the UK. It is used to provide information for international obligations, including the long-term trends of some determinands and the estimation of riverborne input of selected determinands to the sea.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","National","River Reach","Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Chemical and Physico-chemical data is collected via site-specific surveys","locations":["POLYGON((-6.236 49.943, -6.236 55.816, 2.072 55.816, 2.072 49.943, -6.236 49.943))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme Summary Data ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Farmscoper is a decision support tool that allows an assessment of the cost and effectiveness of agricultural mitigation methods on multiple pollutants. It incorporates meta-models of a number of different pollutant models which have previously been used for government policy support at national scale. Farmscoper was originally developed for use at farm scale, but the tool has now been expanded (v3) to include functionality to predict pollutant losses and mitigation impacts for multiple farms in order to simulate one or more catchments. It contains all the data required for use at Water Management Catchment scale in England. ","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"a08670f4-e00c-4dcb-8e08-cfc8bb6dbde7","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Cost Effectiveness","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Farm","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Soil","Sediment","Regional","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Farm","Cost Effectiveness","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"FARMSCOPER  (Farm Scale Optimisation of Pollutant Emission Reductions)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"Farmscoper is a decision support tool that allows an assessment of the cost and effectiveness of agricultural mitigation methods on multiple pollutants. It incorporates meta-models of a number of different pollutant models which have previously been used for government..."},{"publicationDate":"2017-02-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Atkins Ltd"],"authorGivenName":["P."],"authorFamilyName":["Daldorph"],"authorFullName":["Daldorph, P."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate loads are expressed as kilograms per day (kg/day) and the in-river concentrations as milligrams per litre (mg/l). Sources are both diffuse and point. Diffuse sources include livestock farming, arable farming, highways, urban runoff, background (from soils), onsite wastewater treatment systems and atmospheric deposition. Point sources include treated wastewater effluent, combined sewer overflows and storm tanks, industrial discharges and mine water discharges. Concentrations and loads are modelled using the Environment Agency's catchment river model, SIMCAT, at the locations of model features or every 1 km along each river, taking into account all upstream sources and user defined river losses. \n\nSAGIS is a modelling framework was developed through the UK Water Industry Research Programme (UKWIR) project 'Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD' [1], with support from the Environment Agency and SEPA. The model is also described in [2]\n\n[1] UKWIR (2012) Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD (12/WW/02/3). Final report for UK Water Industry Research, 1 Queen Annes Gate, London, ISBN: 1 84057 637 5.\n[2] Comber, S.D.; Smith, R.; Daldorph, P.; Gardner, M.J.; Constantino, C.; Ellor, B. (2013) Development of a Chemical Source Apportionment Decision Support Framework for Catchment Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9824-9832","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"8677dabe-bc76-4a03-8764-0bedc8976928","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Catchment","National"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Peter","P."],"familyName":["Daldorph"],"fullName":["Daldorph, P.","UKWIR"],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Catchment","National","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Pollution","nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"keywordsOther":["nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"This dataset has been modelled with The Source Apportionment-GIS (SAGIS) using data from the period spanning from 2006 to 2009. Input datasets include: river network outline, water body boundary, hydrology and river monitoring data, rainfall, land use and agricultural data, on-site wastewater treatment system, sewage treatment works, combined sewer overflows and storm tank locations, soil erosion, highway runoff and pollution inventory industrial discharges to river and sewer including extensive sewage treatment works data. \n\nLoads are converted to concentrations in river waters using the SIMulation of CATchments (SIMCAT) water quality model, which is incorporated within SAGIS, so that the contribution to in-stream concentrations from individual sources can be quantified. Diffuse sources of nutrient pollution are incorporated into SAGIS from the Phosphorus and Sediment Yield Characterisation In Catchments (PSYCHIC) model (developed by a consortium of academic and government organisations led by ADAS Water Quality). \n\nSAGIS models are not time based and do not show seasonal variation; river flow can vary according to seasonal changes which would have an impact on results. The model will also always be a simplified version of reality and so must be used as an advisory tool and not as the sole basis of decisions. Data is often subject to change and so the models require regular updates. Livestock and arable inputs have been calculated from the ADAS models PSYCHIC and NEAPN and have been shown to overestimate inputs in some areas. There is also a related issue, of changing crop types and land use.","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"organisation":["Atkins Ltd","UK Water Industry Research","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf","10.5285/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Water Industry Research"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910","https://ror.org/00ajykz30","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Source apportionment of nutrient contributions to rivers in England and Wales modelled with SAGIS","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"QUESTOR modelling shows that all the mitigation methods applied can reduce the amount of Chlorophyll-a predicted to occur in the river. The extent of the reduction is different depending on the data used to drive the QUESTOR model. The effect of increasing the shading (from 20-60%) declines downstream as the river becomes too wide for trees to provide shade.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"edddc8d0-4389-4d6d-981b-e076fc9034f1","impCaMMPIssues":["Other Services","Confidence levels"],"impScale":["River reach"],"impTopic":["Water quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","River reach","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","Confidence levels","Biological quality"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 5: Uncertainty in ecological responses to water quality control measures at the river basin scale. ","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"QUESTOR modelling shows that all the mitigation methods applied can reduce the amount of Chlorophyll-a predicted to occur in the river. The extent of the reduction is different depending on the data used to drive the QUESTOR model. The effect of increasing the shading..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE provides apportionment of annual loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and fine-grained sediment, from both diffuse (agriculture, urban, river channel banks, atmospheric deposition, groundwater) and point (sewage treatment works, septic tanks, combined sewer overflows, storm tanks) sources to rivers at Water Framework Directive waterbody scale. The data cover individual and accumulated waterbodies.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"427bf467-002a-477f-a227-8dd4950d0b47","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Sediment","Regional","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Land use","Confidence levels","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SEPARATE (SEctor Pollutant AppoRtionment for the AquaTic Environment)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-07-19T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (DTC) Data"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each catchment has an area of approximately 10km2. The stream water quality and biology were monitored to understand how the catchment responds to storm events. This work included measuring many properties of the water including the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and total amount of water leaving the catchment.\n\nThe experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\nFocus catchment outlets at Newby Beck and Pow were both equipped with in-situ analysers and sondes (Hach Lange Sigmatax, Phosphax, Nitratax and ammonium sondes; and a YSI sonde) to monitor the following parameters: total phosphorus , total reactive phosphorus, nitrate , ammonium, pH, conductivity, water temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll-a, turbidity and water level. The catchment outlet at Thackthwaite was equipped with a YSI sonde only, and measured the same parameters except for nutrients. \n\nNested within all focus catchments, smaller sub-catchments were monitored for turbidity (Analite sonde) and water level. At every monitoring location, an ISCO auto-sampler collected water samples during selected storm events. These samples were routinely analysed in the laboratory, which enables the in situ water quality analysis to be checked against standard methods. Each focus catchment also has its own automated weather station (AWS) including a tipping bucket rain gauge, plus two additional tipping bucket rain gauges. At each monitoring site, where water level was recorded, the stream was gauged and rating curves developed, which were used to convert water level into flow. This archive contains quality assured data generated by field monitoring and laboratory analysis by EdenDTC. Sample collection, analysis and quality assurance protocols were implemented, details of which can be found in the relevant supplementary document.","locations":["POLYGON((-3.157 54.304, -3.157 54.943, -2.124 54.943, -2.124 54.304, -3.157 54.304))"],"organisation":["Eden DTC"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrological and ecological monitoring in the river Eden catchment (2011 - 2015) [DTC project]","version":1.0,"view":["public","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-02-17T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Environment Agency","University of Reading"],"authorGivenName":["M.J.","E.","J.","M.","S.","R.A.","H.P.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Bowes","Gozzard","Newman","Loewenthal","Halliday","Skeffington","Jarvie","Wade","Palmer-Felgate"],"authorFullName":["Bowes, M.J.","Gozzard, E.","Newman, J.","Loewenthal, M.","Halliday, S.","Skeffington, R.A.","Jarvie, H.P.","Wade, A.","Palmer-Felgate, E."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-1607"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/05v62cm79"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This data set comprises of hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data of the River Enborne near Brimpton (National grid reference SU568648), from November 2009 to February 2012. Parameters measured are total reactive phosphorus, nitrate, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and total chlorophyll. The accompanying hourly averaged flow data (from the EA flow gauging station at the same site) are also supplied. The monitoring programme was funded by the EPSRC, through the LIMPIDS project. ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"37b4c75a-bb5b-467d-9919-7ecdc5cc025a","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["Mike","M.J.","E.","J.","M.","S.","R.A.","H.P.","A."],"familyName":["Bowes","Gozzard","Newman","Loewenthal","Halliday","Skeffington","Jarvie","Wade","Palmer-Felgate"],"fullName":["Bowes, M.","Bowes, M.J.","Gozzard, E.","Newman, J.","Loewenthal, M.","Halliday, S.","Skeffington, R.A.","Jarvie, H.P.","Wade, A.","Palmer-Felgate, E."],"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","United Kingdom","England","Berkshire","Hourly"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","England","Berkshire"],"keywordsOther":["Hourly"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The hourly nutrient data was produced by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) fieldwork staff at Wallingford. Phosphorus data was produced in the field using a Systea Micromac C auto-analyser. Nitrate was monitored by UV absorption using a Hach Lange Nitratax Plus probe. The other physical parameters and total chlorophyll were monitored using a YSI 6600 sonde. The monitoring site installation, telemetry / data collection and maintenance / calibration of the YSI probe was conducted by the Environment Agency's National Water Quality Instrumentation Service. Data processing was carried out by CEH and the University of Reading. Full details of the field procedures and laboratory groundtruthing samples are outlined in the following papers. \n\n(1) Bowes MJ, Jarvie HP, Halliday SJ, Skeffington RA, Wade AJ, Loewenthal M et al (2015). Characterising phosphorus and nitrate inputs to a rural river using high-frequency concentration-flow relationships. Sci Total Environ 511: 608-620\n(2) Halliday S, Skeffington R, Bowes M, Gozzard E, Newman J, Loewenthal M et al (2014). The Water Quality of the River Enborne, UK: Observations from High-Frequency Monitoring in a Rural, Lowland River System. Water 6: 150-180.\n(3) Wade AJ, Palmer-Felgate EJ, Halliday SJ, Skeffington RA, Loewenthal M, Jarvie HP et al (2012). Hydrochemical processes in lowland rivers: insights from in situ, high-resolution monitoring. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 4323-4342.","locations":["POLYGON((-1.186 51.378, -1.186 51.38, -1.184 51.38, -1.184 51.378, -1.186 51.378))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-1607"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Environment Agency","University of Reading","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1431339142556","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/11d712e0-7456-4ea9-8af8-fe81a666e91b","10.5285/11d712e0-7456-4ea9-8af8-fe81a666e91b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/05v62cm79","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Bowes M.J., Jarvie H.P., Halliday S.J., Skeffington R.A., Wade A.J., Loewenthal M. et al. (2015). Characterising phosphorus and nitrate inputs to a rural river using high-frequency concentration-flow relationships. Sci Total Environ 511: 608-620","Halliday, S., Skeffington, R., Bowes, M., Gozzard, E., Newman, J., Loewenthal, M., … Wade, A. (2014). The Water Quality of the River Enborne, UK: Observations from High-Frequency Monitoring in a Rural, Lowland River System. Water, 6(1), 150–180","Wade A.J., Palmer-Felgate E.J., Halliday SJ, Skeffington R.A., Loewenthal M., Jarvie H.P. et al. (2012). Hydrochemical processes in lowland rivers: insights from in situ, high-resolution monitoring. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 4323-4342. "],"title":"Hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data for the River Enborne, Berkshire (2009-2012)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This data set comprises of hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data of the River Enborne near Brimpton (National grid reference SU568648), from November 2009 to February 2012. Parameters measured are total reactive phosphorus, nitrate, conductivity, temperature,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"more to come","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ad5d449a-ffe5-4681-b3be-8336cb9ca6eb","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","River flow and networks","Regional","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Confidence levels","Climate Change","Catchment","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"DTT (Dynamic Typology Tool)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"more to come"},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) detail dataset contains individual determinand results for all sites in the UK Harmonised Monitoring Scheme network from 1974 onwards. The sampling network includes 230 sites which are mainly located at the tidal limits of major rivers or at the points of confluence of significant tributaries. The information held within the HMS includes data on: oxygen and ammonia, nutrients, list II metals and pesticides. \nThe Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) was established to provide an archive of water quality data for the UK. It is used to provide information for international obligations, including the long-term trends of some determinands and the estimation of riverborne input of selected determinands to the sea.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"c68f62e2-e6dc-4df3-bde2-5466bdba013a","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","National","River Reach","Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Chemical and Physico-chemical data is collected via site-specific surveys","locations":["POLYGON((-6.236 49.943, -6.236 55.816, 2.072 55.816, 2.072 49.943, -6.236 49.943))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/c68f62e2-e6dc-4df3-bde2-5466bdba013a"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme Detailed Data","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) detail dataset contains individual determinand results for all sites in the UK Harmonised Monitoring Scheme network from 1974 onwards. The sampling network includes 230 sites which are mainly..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage and local output suitable for stakeholder engagement in study areas. Application of the tool can aid identification, targeting and prioritisation of land-use opportunities for management of water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e534c7cc-d2fb-47e6-8ace-36ced5f9af48","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 7: Interpolation of model outputs and data from catchment to national scales and monitored to non-monitored sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-01-15T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["The James Hutton Institute"],"authorGivenName":["Helen","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"authorFamilyName":["Watson","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Stutter","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"authorFullName":["Watson, H.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP), nitrate (NO3-N), ammonium (NH4-N) and suspended sediments (SS); water chemistry measurements are in units of mg l-1 for all determinands. Sampling for water chemistry took place at a weekly frequency between 2000 and the end of 2003, with some daily sampling during rainfall events. Daily samples were then collected between February 2004 and June 2005. After June 2005, infrequent irregular sampling took place, with fewer determinands. Mean daily flow, in m3s-1, was also recorded.\n\nThe Tarland Burn is a tributary of the River Dee (northeast Scotland). The samples were collected at Coull (WGS84 57.111, -2.810; OSGB 351050, 802540). ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"23d98eb0-d0d9-420b-8ffc-6a88ee230428","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Helen","Marc","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"familyName":["Watson","Stutter","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"fullName":["Watson, H.","Stutter, M.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","River Flow and Networks","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment","Coull","Pollution"],"keywordsPlace":["Coull"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Water chemistry data: Sub-daily sampling took place during storms during 2004 and 2005, with 2 to 6 samples per day. Sub-daily data were converted to daily means. Samples were collected via a combination of grab sampling (pre 2004 and post 2005) and auto-sampler. Suspended sediment concentrations were determined gravimetrically on filter papers. Filtrates were analysed for total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), nitrate and ammonium. Unfiltered samples were manually digested by a persulphate autoclave procedure, then analysed as molybdate reactive P to give total P (TP). Particulate P (PP) was calculated as the difference between TP and TDP. Details of sampling protocol, autosampler set-up and analytical methods are given in [1] [2]\n\nDischarge data: Daily mean flow was derived from 15 minute discharge data, with a 'day' classed as 9am - 8:45am, for compatibility with Met Office rainfall data. The 15 minute discharge data was derived from stage information.\n\n[1] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water and particulate N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.048\n[2] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of streamwater phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.045","locations":["POLYGON((-2.812 57.11, -2.812 57.112, -2.808 57.112, -2.808 57.11, -2.812 57.11))"],"organisation":["The James Hutton Institute","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f","10.5285/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water particulate and dissolved N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology, 350(3-4), 187-202","Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of stream water phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology, 350(34), 203-214"],"title":"Discharge and water chemistry measurements from Tarland Burn at Coull (Scotland) (2000-2010) ","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP),..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"SAGIS was developed for UKWIR, with support from the Environment Agency, SEPA and Natural England, to analyse sources of chemicals at the river basin scale and identify measures to improve river, lake and estuary water quality. National data on the source of chemicals from a range of point and diffuse sectors are processed to create inputs to the water quality model SIMCAT, and the outputs used to create databases and visualisations of predicted apportioned water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"57c40da0-2dc7-43a1-8291-f9ae2fd0a18d","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Confidence levels"],"impScale":["River reach","Regional","National","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Sediment","River reach","Regional","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Land use","Confidence levels","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"SAGIS was developed for UKWIR, with support from the Environment Agency, SEPA and Natural England, to analyse sources of chemicals at the river basin scale and identify measures to improve river, lake and estuary water quality. National data on the source of chemicals..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This case study examines the sensitivity / uncertainty in outputs of models at various scales resulting from differences or uncertainties in models and input driving data. Three cases will be considered: A) uncertainties arising from the model structure being used; B) uncertainties arising from the data being used; and C) uncertainties arising from drivers used in future scenarios.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"bba51e3c-9808-4dbb-951a-30a127b8a4b3","impCaMMPIssues":["Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impScale":["River reach","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Climate scenarios","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Faecal Indicator Organisms"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Soil","River reach","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Faecal Indicator Organisms","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 6: Effects of input data quality and quantity on evaluation of land management policies and agri-environment interventions at catchment to national scales.","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"This case study examines the sensitivity / uncertainty in outputs of models at various scales resulting from differences or uncertainties in models and input driving data. Three cases will be considered: A) uncertainties arising from the model structure being used;..."}],"facets":[{"fieldName":"resourceType","displayName":"Resource type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Case Study","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=resourceType%7CCase+Study","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Dataset","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=resourceType%7CDataset","active":false,"count":122},{"name":"Model (UKCEH)","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=resourceType%7CModel+%28UKCEH%29","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impCaMMPIssues","displayName":"CaMMP Issues","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Climate Change","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CClimate+Change","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Confidence levels","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CConfidence+levels","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Cost Effectiveness","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CCost+Effectiveness","active":false,"count":3},{"name":"Management outcome","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome","active":false,"count":12},{"name":"Other Services","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7COther+Services","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Pollution Source","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CPollution+Source","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Transferability","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CTransferability","active":false,"count":13}]},{"fieldName":"impDataType","displayName":"Data Type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Geospatial / Map","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impDataType%7CGeospatial+%2F+Map","active":false,"count":69},{"name":"Tabular","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impDataType%7CTabular","active":false,"count":42},{"name":"Time Series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impDataType%7CTime+Series","active":false,"count":37},{"name":"Time series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impDataType%7CTime+series","active":false,"count":5}]},{"fieldName":"impScale","displayName":"Scale","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":true,"count":47},{"name":"Farm","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CFarm","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Field","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CField","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"National","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":true,"count":93},{"name":"Plot","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CPlot","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Regional","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":6},{"name":"River Reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CRiver+Reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"River reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":true,"count":10},{"name":"catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7Ccatchment","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"national","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7Cnational","active":false,"count":3}]},{"fieldName":"impTopic","displayName":"Topic","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Administration Units","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CAdministration+Units","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Agricultural Practices","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CAgricultural+Practices","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Air Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CAir+Quality","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Biodiversity","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CBiodiversity","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Catchments and Topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+Topography","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"Catchments and topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+topography","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Climate Scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+Scenarios","active":false,"count":8},{"name":"Climate scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+scenarios","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Geology","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CGeology","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+Gas+Fluxes","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Greenhouse gas fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+gas+fluxes","active":false,"count":5},{"name":"Land Cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Cover","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Land Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Use","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Land cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CLand+cover","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Land use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CLand+use","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural Pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+Pollution","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+pollution","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"River Flow and Networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+Flow+and+Networks","active":false,"count":17},{"name":"River flow and networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+flow+and+networks","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Site Specific Data","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CSite+Specific+Data","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Soil","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CSoil","active":false,"count":18},{"name":"Water Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Quality","active":false,"count":44},{"name":"Water Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Use","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Water quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CWater+quality","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Weather","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impTopic%7CWeather","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impWaterPollutant","displayName":"Water Pollutant","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Biological Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+Quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Biological quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Faecal Indicator Organisms","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CFaecal+Indicator+Organisms","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Metaldehyde","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CMetaldehyde","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Nitrogen","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":true,"count":33},{"name":"Phosphorous","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorous","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Phosphorus","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":true,"count":30},{"name":"Sediment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment","active":false,"count":17}]}],"order":"asc"}