{"numFound":34,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?page=2&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","results":[{"publicationDate":"2017-02-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Atkins Ltd"],"authorGivenName":["P."],"authorFamilyName":["Daldorph"],"authorFullName":["Daldorph, P."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate loads are expressed as kilograms per day (kg/day) and the in-river concentrations as milligrams per litre (mg/l). Sources are both diffuse and point. Diffuse sources include livestock farming, arable farming, highways, urban runoff, background (from soils), onsite wastewater treatment systems and atmospheric deposition. Point sources include treated wastewater effluent, combined sewer overflows and storm tanks, industrial discharges and mine water discharges. Concentrations and loads are modelled using the Environment Agency's catchment river model, SIMCAT, at the locations of model features or every 1 km along each river, taking into account all upstream sources and user defined river losses. \n\nSAGIS is a modelling framework was developed through the UK Water Industry Research Programme (UKWIR) project 'Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD' [1], with support from the Environment Agency and SEPA. The model is also described in [2]\n\n[1] UKWIR (2012) Chemical Source Apportionment under the WFD (12/WW/02/3). Final report for UK Water Industry Research, 1 Queen Annes Gate, London, ISBN: 1 84057 637 5.\n[2] Comber, S.D.; Smith, R.; Daldorph, P.; Gardner, M.J.; Constantino, C.; Ellor, B. (2013) Development of a Chemical Source Apportionment Decision Support Framework for Catchment Management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9824-9832","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"8677dabe-bc76-4a03-8764-0bedc8976928","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Catchment","National"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Peter","P."],"familyName":["Daldorph"],"fullName":["Daldorph, P.","UKWIR"],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Catchment","National","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Pollution","nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"keywordsOther":["nutrient","river","SAGIS","SIMCAT","arable farming","livestock farming","highway","waste water","pollutant deposition","industrial effluent","runoff","agricultural effluent"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"This dataset has been modelled with The Source Apportionment-GIS (SAGIS) using data from the period spanning from 2006 to 2009. Input datasets include: river network outline, water body boundary, hydrology and river monitoring data, rainfall, land use and agricultural data, on-site wastewater treatment system, sewage treatment works, combined sewer overflows and storm tank locations, soil erosion, highway runoff and pollution inventory industrial discharges to river and sewer including extensive sewage treatment works data. \n\nLoads are converted to concentrations in river waters using the SIMulation of CATchments (SIMCAT) water quality model, which is incorporated within SAGIS, so that the contribution to in-stream concentrations from individual sources can be quantified. Diffuse sources of nutrient pollution are incorporated into SAGIS from the Phosphorus and Sediment Yield Characterisation In Catchments (PSYCHIC) model (developed by a consortium of academic and government organisations led by ADAS Water Quality). \n\nSAGIS models are not time based and do not show seasonal variation; river flow can vary according to seasonal changes which would have an impact on results. The model will also always be a simplified version of reality and so must be used as an advisory tool and not as the sole basis of decisions. Data is often subject to change and so the models require regular updates. Livestock and arable inputs have been calculated from the ADAS models PSYCHIC and NEAPN and have been shown to overestimate inputs in some areas. There is also a related issue, of changing crop types and land use.","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"organisation":["Atkins Ltd","UK Water Industry Research","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf","10.5285/8c5d9e38-0244-4a39-8600-a85513a6fecf"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Water Industry Research"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00qcr4910","https://ror.org/00ajykz30","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Source apportionment of nutrient contributions to rivers in England and Wales modelled with SAGIS","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of in-river concentrations (mg/l) and loads (kg/day) of nutrients to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, modelled with SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS). The nutrients include nitrate (mg/l N) and ortho-phosphate (mg/l P); the estimate..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-07-19T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (DTC) Data"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each catchment has an area of approximately 10km2. The stream water quality and biology were monitored to understand how the catchment responds to storm events. This work included measuring many properties of the water including the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and total amount of water leaving the catchment.\n\nThe experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Agricultural Practices","Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Biological Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The experimental approach used for assessing mitigation used pre-mitigation instream data to provide a baseline against which to compare post-mitigation instream conditions, and also compares a 'manipulated' (mitigated) sub-catchment with a 'non-manipulated' (control) sub-catchment. \n\nFocus catchment outlets at Newby Beck and Pow were both equipped with in-situ analysers and sondes (Hach Lange Sigmatax, Phosphax, Nitratax and ammonium sondes; and a YSI sonde) to monitor the following parameters: total phosphorus , total reactive phosphorus, nitrate , ammonium, pH, conductivity, water temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll-a, turbidity and water level. The catchment outlet at Thackthwaite was equipped with a YSI sonde only, and measured the same parameters except for nutrients. \n\nNested within all focus catchments, smaller sub-catchments were monitored for turbidity (Analite sonde) and water level. At every monitoring location, an ISCO auto-sampler collected water samples during selected storm events. These samples were routinely analysed in the laboratory, which enables the in situ water quality analysis to be checked against standard methods. Each focus catchment also has its own automated weather station (AWS) including a tipping bucket rain gauge, plus two additional tipping bucket rain gauges. At each monitoring site, where water level was recorded, the stream was gauged and rating curves developed, which were used to convert water level into flow. This archive contains quality assured data generated by field monitoring and laboratory analysis by EdenDTC. Sample collection, analysis and quality assurance protocols were implemented, details of which can be found in the relevant supplementary document.","locations":["POLYGON((-3.157 54.304, -3.157 54.943, -2.124 54.943, -2.124 54.304, -3.157 54.304))"],"organisation":["Eden DTC"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ae6c29d2-24ae-456e-947a-280ea16838ff"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrological and ecological monitoring in the river Eden catchment (2011 - 2015) [DTC project]","version":1.0,"view":["public","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The River Eden Demonstration Test Catchment (EdenDTC)  monitored water quality, hydrology and ecology across 3 sub-catchments to assess the effectiveness of  diffuse pollution mitigation measures.\n\nThe focus areas are in the Thackthwaite, Newby and Pow catchments. Each..."},{"publicationDate":"2013-07-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.","M.","N.","I.","R."],"authorFamilyName":["Leach","Neal","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"authorFullName":["Leach, D.","Neal, M.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Discrete data for major ions and nutrients in river water for 13 sites in the Humber catchment over the periods 1993 to 1997 and 1996 to 1997 and for 3 sites from the Tweed catchment over the period 1994 to 1997. Ions and nutrients measured were: Ammonia, Calcium (dissolved), Magnesium (dissolved), Potassium (dissolved), Sodium (dissolved), Bromide-ion, Carbon (organic dissolved), Chloride-ion, Nitrate, Nitrite, Phosphorus (soluble reactive), Phosphorus (total dissolved), Silicate (reactive dissolved), Sulphate, Carbon (organic particulate), Nitrogen (particulate), Phosphorus (total). Sites were sampled at regular weekly intervals and more intermittently during high flows (on average an extra sampling once a month per site). Samples were obtained using a wide neck PTFE bottle in a plastic covered bottle carrier (lowered from bridges where possible otherwise collected by immersing sample bottle by hand in the water as near the main flow as possible). Samples were filtered through Whatman 0.45um sterile membrane filters immediately on return to laboratory. Samples stored in sterilin tubes in the dark at 40C and analysed by Dionex DX100 ion chromatography system. Silicate reactive dissolved and Chloride-ion concentrations were determined by automated colourimetry and dissolved organic carbon concentrations were determined using a TOCsin II aqueous carbon analyser. Some samples on the River Aire were collected using EPIC automatic samplers. The analysis was carried out by members of the analytical chemistry section at York University (from April 1994 until November 1996) and at Wallingford Institute of Hydrology (September 1993 to April 1994 and December 1996 to April 1997), as part of the Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS).","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"c7caf4ec-5143-4131-b095-2a7036b4ef17","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Matt","D.","M.","N.","I.","R."],"familyName":["Fry","Leach","Neal","Bachiller-Jareno","Tindall","Moore"],"fullName":["Fry, M.","Leach, D.","Neal, M.","Bachiller-Jareno, N.","Tindall, I.","Moore, R."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd","Calcium","Magnesium","Potassium","Sodium","Bromide","Silicate","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","nitrogen","sulphate","phosphorus","nitrite","nitrate","carbon","chloride","ammonia","water quality","Water quality"],"keywordsPlace":["Humber","England","Swale","Derwent","Aire","Calder","Trent","Ouse","Nidd"],"keywordsOther":["Calcium","Magnesium","Potassium","Sodium","Bromide","Silicate","Land Ocean Interaction Study","LOIS","nitrogen","sulphate","phosphorus","nitrite","nitrate","carbon","chloride","ammonia","water quality","Water quality"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"For the major ion determinations, quality control standards were included with the samples during analysis. Standards were periodically sent to the analytical chemistry at the Institute of Hydrology (Wallingford) for comparison. Spiked samples prepared by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology (East Stoke) were also analysed occasionally as part of inter-laboratory comparison studies. The lowest quotable values were taken as five times the detection level and variables were rounded to the nearest 0.05 mg/l for Bromide, 0.1 mg/l for Nitrite, 0.2 mg/l for Phosphate, Sodium, Ammonium, Potassium, Magnesium. 0.5 mg/l for Nitrate and Calcium, and 1 mg/l for Chloride and Sulphate. For Carbon organic dissolved, Chloride-ion and Silicate reactive dissolved, the lowest quotable values were taken as 2% of the highest calibration standard and both variables were rounded to 1% of the highest calibration standard. A zip file containing box-and-whisker plots for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site is available to enable prospective users to understand data quality.","locations":["POLYGON((-2.75 53.1, -2.75 55.8, -0.72 55.8, -0.72 53.1, -2.75 53.1))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of York","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1373029845405","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/4482fa14-aee2-4c7f-9c62-a08dc9704051","10.5285/4482fa14-aee2-4c7f-9c62-a08dc9704051"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04m01e293","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Major ion and nutrient data from rivers [LOIS]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Discrete data for major ions and nutrients in river water for 13 sites in the Humber catchment over the periods 1993 to 1997 and 1996 to 1997 and for 3 sites from the Tweed catchment over the period 1994 to 1997. Ions and nutrients measured were: Ammonia, Calcium (dissolved),..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["Data for DTC Phase I from Hampshire Avon DTC Consortium"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water quality and freshwater ecology.\n\nDatasets are available from the DTC data archive with detailed information on monitoring undertaken and protocols used, but in general consist of:\n\nEcological monitoring:\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Deposited Fine-grained Sediment Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (reach-averaged masses of fine-grained sediment in the stream bed at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Diatom Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (diatom taxa recorded from samples taken at each of the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Dataset 2010-2013 (macroinvertebrate taxa, and their abundance, found in each sample taken at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC)\n- Hampshire Avon DTC Macrophyte Monitoring Dataset 2011-2013 (list of plant taxa found, with an areal cover estimate, and associated environmental data in each surveyed reach at the 11 Avon & Tamar DTC sites)\n\nHydrological and water quality monitoring: \nBankside (i.e in situe) and laboratory analysis of hydrology and water quality at 9 locations across the catchments. Bankside datasets generally include 15 minute river flow, turbidity (NTU), water temperature and dissolved oxygen, though some sites also record pH, and others include rainfall as well as chlorophylls, conductivity, ammonium, nitrate, total phosphorus (TP) and total reactive phosphorus (TRP) . Laboratory analyses generally include daily samples analysed for nutrient fractions / species.\n\nHampshire Avon DTC sites:\n- Burracott, Neet catchment\n- Ebble downstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n- Ebble upstream, Hampshire Avon catchment (includes rainfall)\n- Sem at Cool's Cottage, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Sem at Priors Farm, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Kingston Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment\n- Wylye at Brixton Deverill, Hampshire Avon catchment (additional bankside water quality series monitored)\n\nTamar DTC sites:\n- Caudworthy Water at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment:\n- Winnacott Bridge at Caudworthy Ford, Tamar catchment (no bankside hydrology and water quality)\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Biological Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Catchment","Time Series","Site Specific Data","Agricultural Practices","Biological Quality","Water Quality","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Sediment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Protocols for water quality monitoring, and links to descriptions or publications for the ecological monitoring methods are available via the DTC data pages provide in the online resource links.","locations":["POLYGON((-4.679 50.237, -4.679 51.341, -1.515 51.341, -1.515 50.237, -4.679 50.237))"],"organisation":["Rothamsted Research"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/62354bcc-5ed7-4ada-99d5-942d7ef9d796"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"High resolution water quality, hydrology and ecological monitoring data from the Hampshire Avon and Tamar (2011 - 2014) [DTC project] ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"High resolution datasets of ecological, hydrological and water quality monitoring at approx. 11 sites across the Hampshire Avon and Tamar Defra Test Catchment (DTC) sites between 2011 and 2014, for monitoring and assessing the effects of on-farm interventions on water..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-01-15T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["The James Hutton Institute"],"authorGivenName":["Helen","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"authorFamilyName":["Watson","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Stutter","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"authorFullName":["Watson, H.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP), nitrate (NO3-N), ammonium (NH4-N) and suspended sediments (SS); water chemistry measurements are in units of mg l-1 for all determinands. Sampling for water chemistry took place at a weekly frequency between 2000 and the end of 2003, with some daily sampling during rainfall events. Daily samples were then collected between February 2004 and June 2005. After June 2005, infrequent irregular sampling took place, with fewer determinands. Mean daily flow, in m3s-1, was also recorded.\n\nThe Tarland Burn is a tributary of the River Dee (northeast Scotland). The samples were collected at Coull (WGS84 57.111, -2.810; OSGB 351050, 802540). ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"23d98eb0-d0d9-420b-8ffc-6a88ee230428","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Helen","Marc","S.","L.","Y.","R.","C.","M.I. ","M."],"familyName":["Watson","Stutter","Langan","Johnston","Cook","Cooper","Taylor","Masson","Dunn","Jackson-Blake","McKeen"],"fullName":["Watson, H.","Stutter, M.","Langan, S.","Johnston, L.","Cook, Y.","Cooper, R.","Taylor, C.","Masson, L.","Dunn, S.","Stutter, M.I.","Jackson-Blake, L.","McKeen, M."],"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","River Flow and Networks","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment","Coull","Pollution"],"keywordsPlace":["Coull"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Water chemistry data: Sub-daily sampling took place during storms during 2004 and 2005, with 2 to 6 samples per day. Sub-daily data were converted to daily means. Samples were collected via a combination of grab sampling (pre 2004 and post 2005) and auto-sampler. Suspended sediment concentrations were determined gravimetrically on filter papers. Filtrates were analysed for total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), nitrate and ammonium. Unfiltered samples were manually digested by a persulphate autoclave procedure, then analysed as molybdate reactive P to give total P (TP). Particulate P (PP) was calculated as the difference between TP and TDP. Details of sampling protocol, autosampler set-up and analytical methods are given in [1] [2]\n\nDischarge data: Daily mean flow was derived from 15 minute discharge data, with a 'day' classed as 9am - 8:45am, for compatibility with Met Office rainfall data. The 15 minute discharge data was derived from stage information.\n\n[1] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water and particulate N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.048\n[2] Stutter, M.I., Langan, S.J., Cooper, R.J., 2008. Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of streamwater phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3-4), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.045","locations":["POLYGON((-2.812 57.11, -2.812 57.112, -2.808 57.112, -2.808 57.11, -2.812 57.11))"],"organisation":["The James Hutton Institute","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f","10.5285/f9a69fcb-321d-4f65-a8cf-cfe789224c8f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/03rzp5127","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial and temporal dynamics of stream water particulate and dissolved N, P and C forms along a catchment transect, NE Scotland. Journal of Hydrology, 350(3-4), 187-202","Stutter, M. I., Langan, S. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Spatial contributions of diffuse inputs and within-channel processes to the form of stream water phosphorus over storm events. Journal of Hydrology, 350(34), 203-214"],"title":"Discharge and water chemistry measurements from Tarland Burn at Coull (Scotland) (2000-2010) ","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Mean daily flow and water chemistry data collected from the Tarland Burn, recorded between 2000-2010. Water chemistry determinands measured include: total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), total phosphorous (TP), particulate phosphorus (PP),..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling network includes 230 sites, which are mainly located at the tidal limits of major rivers or at the points of confluence of significant tributaries. The information held within the HMS includes data on: oxygen and ammonia, nutrients, list II metals and pesticides. Annual mean concentrations have been calculated for each HMS site. The data show the annual averages of the site means in each region, with each site given equal weight irrespective of the number of samples taken - an average of all the samples would give a greater weight to the sites at which samples are most frequently taken. In order to give an indication of the range of values at different sites within each region, figures are also given for the maximum and minimum site mean for each region. The data also includes for the UK average, the 10th percentile and the 90th percentile of the site means for the whole of the UK. For each determinand in each year and the 10-percentile and the 90-percentile of the site means in each region.\nThe Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) was established to provide an archive of water quality data for the UK. It is used to provide information for international obligations, including the long-term trends of some determinands and the estimation of riverborne input of selected determinands to the sea.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","National","River Reach","Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Chemical and Physico-chemical data is collected via site-specific surveys","locations":["POLYGON((-6.236 49.943, -6.236 55.816, 2.072 55.816, 2.072 49.943, -6.236 49.943))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e9321b25-d622-4ae6-8a5d-5837086747b8"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme Summary Data ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) data contains statistics for a series of water quality sampling sites including annual means, maximum and minimum values for each Region for specified determinands from 1975 onwards.\nThe sampling..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) detail dataset contains individual determinand results for all sites in the UK Harmonised Monitoring Scheme network from 1974 onwards. The sampling network includes 230 sites which are mainly located at the tidal limits of major rivers or at the points of confluence of significant tributaries. The information held within the HMS includes data on: oxygen and ammonia, nutrients, list II metals and pesticides. \nThe Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) was established to provide an archive of water quality data for the UK. It is used to provide information for international obligations, including the long-term trends of some determinands and the estimation of riverborne input of selected determinands to the sea.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"c68f62e2-e6dc-4df3-bde2-5466bdba013a","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","National","River Reach","Non-agricultural Pollution","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Chemical and Physico-chemical data is collected via site-specific surveys","locations":["POLYGON((-6.236 49.943, -6.236 55.816, 2.072 55.816, 2.072 49.943, -6.236 49.943))"],"organisation":["Environment Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/c68f62e2-e6dc-4df3-bde2-5466bdba013a"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EA Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme Detailed Data","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Historic UK Water Quality Sampling Harmonised Monitoring Scheme (HMS) detail dataset contains individual determinand results for all sites in the UK Harmonised Monitoring Scheme network from 1974 onwards. The sampling network includes 230 sites which are mainly..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"SAGIS was developed for UKWIR, with support from the Environment Agency, SEPA and Natural England, to analyse sources of chemicals at the river basin scale and identify measures to improve river, lake and estuary water quality. National data on the source of chemicals from a range of point and diffuse sectors are processed to create inputs to the water quality model SIMCAT, and the outputs used to create databases and visualisations of predicted apportioned water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"57c40da0-2dc7-43a1-8291-f9ae2fd0a18d","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Confidence levels"],"impScale":["River reach","Regional","National","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Sediment","River reach","Regional","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Land use","Confidence levels","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/57c40da0-2dc7-43a1-8291-f9ae2fd0a18d"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SAGIS (Source Apportionment GIS)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"SAGIS was developed for UKWIR, with support from the Environment Agency, SEPA and Natural England, to analyse sources of chemicals at the river basin scale and identify measures to improve river, lake and estuary water quality. National data on the source of chemicals..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-02-17T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Environment Agency","University of Reading"],"authorGivenName":["M.J.","E.","J.","M.","S.","R.A.","H.P.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Bowes","Gozzard","Newman","Loewenthal","Halliday","Skeffington","Jarvie","Wade","Palmer-Felgate"],"authorFullName":["Bowes, M.J.","Gozzard, E.","Newman, J.","Loewenthal, M.","Halliday, S.","Skeffington, R.A.","Jarvie, H.P.","Wade, A.","Palmer-Felgate, E."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-1607"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/05v62cm79"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This data set comprises of hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data of the River Enborne near Brimpton (National grid reference SU568648), from November 2009 to February 2012. Parameters measured are total reactive phosphorus, nitrate, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and total chlorophyll. The accompanying hourly averaged flow data (from the EA flow gauging station at the same site) are also supplied. The monitoring programme was funded by the EPSRC, through the LIMPIDS project. ","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"37b4c75a-bb5b-467d-9919-7ecdc5cc025a","impDataType":["Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["Mike","M.J.","E.","J.","M.","S.","R.A.","H.P.","A."],"familyName":["Bowes","Gozzard","Newman","Loewenthal","Halliday","Skeffington","Jarvie","Wade","Palmer-Felgate"],"fullName":["Bowes, M.","Bowes, M.J.","Gozzard, E.","Newman, J.","Loewenthal, M.","Halliday, S.","Skeffington, R.A.","Jarvie, H.P.","Wade, A.","Palmer-Felgate, E."],"keyword":["Time Series","Catchment","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","United Kingdom","England","Berkshire","Hourly"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","England","Berkshire"],"keywordsOther":["Hourly"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The hourly nutrient data was produced by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) fieldwork staff at Wallingford. Phosphorus data was produced in the field using a Systea Micromac C auto-analyser. Nitrate was monitored by UV absorption using a Hach Lange Nitratax Plus probe. The other physical parameters and total chlorophyll were monitored using a YSI 6600 sonde. The monitoring site installation, telemetry / data collection and maintenance / calibration of the YSI probe was conducted by the Environment Agency's National Water Quality Instrumentation Service. Data processing was carried out by CEH and the University of Reading. Full details of the field procedures and laboratory groundtruthing samples are outlined in the following papers. \n\n(1) Bowes MJ, Jarvie HP, Halliday SJ, Skeffington RA, Wade AJ, Loewenthal M et al (2015). Characterising phosphorus and nitrate inputs to a rural river using high-frequency concentration-flow relationships. Sci Total Environ 511: 608-620\n(2) Halliday S, Skeffington R, Bowes M, Gozzard E, Newman J, Loewenthal M et al (2014). The Water Quality of the River Enborne, UK: Observations from High-Frequency Monitoring in a Rural, Lowland River System. Water 6: 150-180.\n(3) Wade AJ, Palmer-Felgate EJ, Halliday SJ, Skeffington RA, Loewenthal M, Jarvie HP et al (2012). Hydrochemical processes in lowland rivers: insights from in situ, high-resolution monitoring. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 4323-4342.","locations":["POLYGON((-1.186 51.378, -1.186 51.38, -1.184 51.38, -1.184 51.378, -1.186 51.378))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-1607"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Environment Agency","University of Reading","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1431339142556","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/11d712e0-7456-4ea9-8af8-fe81a666e91b","10.5285/11d712e0-7456-4ea9-8af8-fe81a666e91b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/05v62cm79","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Bowes M.J., Jarvie H.P., Halliday S.J., Skeffington R.A., Wade A.J., Loewenthal M. et al. (2015). Characterising phosphorus and nitrate inputs to a rural river using high-frequency concentration-flow relationships. Sci Total Environ 511: 608-620","Halliday, S., Skeffington, R., Bowes, M., Gozzard, E., Newman, J., Loewenthal, M., … Wade, A. (2014). The Water Quality of the River Enborne, UK: Observations from High-Frequency Monitoring in a Rural, Lowland River System. Water, 6(1), 150–180","Wade A.J., Palmer-Felgate E.J., Halliday SJ, Skeffington R.A., Loewenthal M., Jarvie H.P. et al. (2012). Hydrochemical processes in lowland rivers: insights from in situ, high-resolution monitoring. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16: 4323-4342. "],"title":"Hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data for the River Enborne, Berkshire (2009-2012)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This data set comprises of hourly physical and nutrient monitoring data of the River Enborne near Brimpton (National grid reference SU568648), from November 2009 to February 2012. Parameters measured are total reactive phosphorus, nitrate, conductivity, temperature,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying software implementation of the Polyscape framework. \nThe model was developed through work at Pontbren, exploring impacts of land-use on flooding. Landcover types providing mitigation from flash-flood risk and diffuse pollution through enhanced infiltration (e.g. woodlands and wetlands); these are mapped as providing a service. LUCI then simulates flow and nutrient accumulation over the landscape, with areas routing through these mitigating features mapped as “mitigated” i.e. not hydrologically connected to the stream. Hydrologically connected areas of the landscape with large accumulations of water or pollutants are mapped as having potential to benefit from changes inland cover or management which could provide mitigating services. Hydrological routing is also used to map annual flow and average loading and concentration of N and P at each point on the river network. For agricultural production and carbon, LUCI compares the services provided by the current utilisation of the landscape to estimates of its potential capability. For each service, the model then processes this data to identify areas where change might improve service provision, and where current service provision is good or lacks potential to improve. Trade-offs between outputs for the individual ecosystem services are modelled and mapped, with an option for the user to preferentially weight services of higher importance.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","Plot","National","Field","Farm","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","River flow and networks","Regional","Plot","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Field","Farm","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"LUCI  (Land Utilisation & Capability Indicator)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-11-13T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Wensum Alliance"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Field measurements of major ions, phosphorus, nitrogen fractions, alkalinity and pH from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, measured between 2010 and 2015. Water samples are collected at 7 sites (aka monitoring kiosk A, B, C, D, E, F, M) in this catchment and analysed at the University of East Anglia's laboratory. The analysed determinands include: water pH, electrical conductivity (microsiemens per centimetre), calcium (milligrams per litre), magnesium (milligrams per litre), sodium (milligrams per litre), potassium (milligrams per litre), sulphates (milligrams per litre), Chlorine (milligrams per litre), Alkalinity (mg CaCO3 per litre),\tBicarbonate (milligrams per litre), Carbonate (milligrams per litre), Silicon (micrograms per litre), boron (micrograms per litre), aluminium (micrograms per litre), iron (micrograms per litre), manganese (micrograms per litre), nitrates (milligrams per litre), nitrogen Dioxide (micrograms per litre), ammonium (micrograms per litre), total nitrogen (milligrams per litre), total particulate nitrogen (milligrams per litre), total dissolved nitrogen (milligrams per litre), dissolved organic nitrogen (milligrams per litre), total phosphorus (micrograms per litre), total particulate phosphorus (micrograms per litre), total dissolved phosphorus (micrograms per litre), molybdate reactive phosphorus (micrograms per litre), phosphates (micrograms per litre), total carbon (milligrams per litre), total organic carbon (milligrams per litre), non-purgeable organic carbon (milligrams per litre), total suspended solids (milligrams per litre), total cationic concentration (milliequivalents), total anionic concentration (milliequivalents). \n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"441471d7-f57c-4caa-8b84-526409b8122c","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The Wensum DTC has a monitoring network installed to measure meteorological, hydrological and hydrochemical parameters in target sub-catchments. This statement aims to describe the in-situ monitoring equipment, methods and protocols performed on our data before it is published on the archive. Quality assurance and quality control procedures Quality assurance (QA) procedures are followed during data collection, detailed with our monitoring equipment. Regular maintenance activities are carried out at a weekly frequency and involve cleaning of flow-through cells, clearing of in-channel vegetation and debris where stage is monitored and cleaning of rain gauges. All field work and maintenance activities are entered into maintenance logs for each site, which are used during data quality control (QC) procedures. QC procedures include the validation of high-frequency nutrient data using point samples in the Blackwater sub catchment. These samples are analysed in laboratories following standard methods. Inter-laboratory comparisons are used to check consistency in analytical procedures between sub-catchments. QC procedures also include the identification of errors in all data sets. Errors flagged as critical include: periods of maintenance when data may be unrepresentative; equipment of power failures; or data below limits of detection. On-site visits by field staff are recorded in a maintenance log which is checked against the data during the quality control (QC) post-processing. Any data likely to be disturbed by the routine field work are removed, along with any known periods of downtime, hence some of the data is not included and there may be time breaks in the files accessible on the archive. The Wensum DTC’s sampling kiosks monitor many hydrochemical parameters at a 30 minute resolution. Samples are also analysed less frequently at the University of East Anglia’s laboratory, all using standard laboratory methods. The monitoring equipment used is detailed below: Pressure transducer – Measures stage height. Sontek Argonaut – Doppler meter which measures stage height and infers flow from velocity and pre-programmed stream cross section. Sontek IQ – Doppler meter which measures stage height and infers flow from velocity and pre-programmed stream cross section. YSI 6600 series multi-parameter sonde - Measures water temperature, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, ammonium, turbidity and chlorophyll-a. Hach Lange Nitratax SC optical probe which measures N concentration. The Nitratax sensors are calibrated every 3 months using a standard solution. Hach Lange Sigmatax and Phosphax Sigma analyser (kiosk E and F only) - Measures total phosphorus and total reactive phosphorus colorimetrically using homogenised sample from Sigmatax. The Phosphax Sigma is automatically cleaned and calibrated daily using reagents that are replaced every 3 months. Routine laboratory water sample data Water samples are collected at the monitoring kiosk’s intake pipes and are analysed at the University of East Anglia’s laboratory using standard laboratory practices. ISCO water sample data Automatic ISCO samplers are installed at monitoring kiosks to measure hydrochemical properties of storm derived water. These are analysed at the University of East Anglia.\n","locations":["POLYGON((1.0945972 52.767171, 1.0945972 52.803219, 1.1731899 52.803219, 1.1731899 52.767171, 1.0945972 52.767171))"],"organisation":["Wensum Alliance"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/441471d7-f57c-4caa-8b84-526409b8122c"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Field measurements of major ions, phosphorus, nitrogen fractions, alkalinity and pH (2010-2015) [Wensum DTC]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Field measurements of major ions, phosphorus, nitrogen fractions, alkalinity and pH from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, measured between 2010 and 2015. Water samples are collected at 7 sites (aka monitoring kiosk A, B, C, D, E, F, M) in this catchment..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"INCA-P operates at a daily time step, tracking the stores and fluxes of water, sediment, dissolved and particulate P in both the land and in-stream phases of a river catchment. The model is spatially ‘semi-distributed’: the water course is split into reaches with associated sub-catchments. Two spatial set-ups are possible – the traditional set-up, in which there is a single main stem, or a ‘branched’ set-up. The latter allows in-stream processes, effluent inputs and residence times in tributaries to be simulated, and can be particularly useful in larger catchments or complex river networks. Each sub-catchment is split into landscape classes – there can be as many of these as desired or warranted by the data resolution or needs of the study. Landscape classes are “functional units” and within each unit P inputs, plant P uptake, soils and flow pathways should be similar, though for convenience classes are often based on land use and/or soil type. All land-based processes are calculated for a generic 1 km2 cell for each landscape class within each sub-catchment. Water, sediment, total dissolved P (TDP) and particulate P (PP) outputs from the 1 km2 cell for each land class are multiplied by the land class area, and summed to provide total inputs from the sub-catchment to the reach. These inputs are assumed to enter the stream reach directly, rather than being routed spatially from one land class to another. Reach inputs are therefore from the land phase and from any upstream reaches.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"dc139812-d332-44fb-8fc4-f9943652d1ef","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Time series"],"impScale":["River reach","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","River flow and networks","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Time series","Sediment","River reach","River flow and networks","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Management outcome","Land use","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Climate Change","Catchments and topography","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/dc139812-d332-44fb-8fc4-f9943652d1ef"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"INCA-P  (Integrated Catchments Model - Phosphorus dynamics)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"INCA-P operates at a daily time step, tracking the stores and fluxes of water, sediment, dissolved and particulate P in both the land and in-stream phases of a river catchment. The model is spatially ‘semi-distributed’: the water course is split into reaches with associated..."},{"authorAffiliation":["Defra"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (BSFP) is an annual survey based on the selection each year of a representative sample (c1500) of farms from mainland Britain. The survey is the primary source of information regarding the application of organic and inorganic fertiliser in Great Britain. The first time results were integrated into one report for Great Britain was 1992, before this each country (England and Wales from 1942, Scotland from 1983) had their own report which ran parallel to each other. The main purpose of the survey is to estimate average application rates of nitrogen, phosphate and potash for a wide range of crops and grassland. Information is also collected on applications of sulphur fertilisers, organic manures and lime. Within the later surveys there is also analysis of longer term trends in fertiliser use.\nThe main sections currently contained within the BSFP include:-\n\nSection A - The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice - This is an introduction to the survey and a outline of the structure. Section A of the report also goes into large detail about the survey methodology and general trends and issues in the year in question (e.g. crop areas and weather)\n\nSection B1 - Commentary on fertiliser use in Great Britain - This is the main section of the report and gives the yearly overview of fertiliser results and trends from recent history. The section then gives separate details on the use of fertiliser (N,P,K,S) on tillage crops and grassland.\n\nSection B2 - Commentary on fertiliser use in Great Britain - Analysis of the longer trends in fertiliser use in Great Britain split into sections on nitrogen, phosphate and potash.\n\nSection C - Tables detailing the fertiliser use for Great Britain, plus separate data for England and Wales and for Scotland. Data include rates and proportions receiving fertiliser by crop type, by farm type, by fertiliser type.\n\nSection D - Use of Organic Materials - Information on farm handling and use of organic manures and the fertiliser value of organic manures. This section only came into the survey in 2007. \n\nSection E - Spreading precision, record keeping, nutrient management plans - Farmers asked a series of questions about the care taken in application of fertilisers and manures and in record keeping. This section was created in 2013 as it was within section D previously when only related to organic manures.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"d879b7fc-4716-4965-aa47-eb0ec0b03972","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Agriculture","Fertiliser","Tabular","National","Agricultural Practices","Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"In 2000 to help improve the survey response and to reduce the year-on-year variability, a core of respondents agreed to complete the survey for a number of years. Following on from this in 2006 and 2007 a review of the panel structure was undertaken to ensure that the proportion of respondents who had participated on the panel for five consecutive years or more constituted no more than 20% of the total sample. In the 2014 survey 70% of the sample had responded in the previous year. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["Defra"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/d879b7fc-4716-4965-aa47-eb0ec0b03972"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (1992-2015)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (BSFP) is an annual survey based on the selection each year of a representative sample (c1500) of farms from mainland Britain. The survey is the primary source of information regarding the application of organic and inorganic..."},{"publicationDate":"2017-02-16T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["ADAS UK Ltd"],"authorGivenName":["R.","S.","L.","D."],"authorFamilyName":["Gooday","Anthony","Calrow","Harris","Skirvin"],"authorFullName":["Gooday, R.","Anthony, S.","Calrow, L.","Harris, D.","Skirvin, D."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/006d11e04"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of annual loads of phosphorus, sediment, nitrogen and faecal coliform from non-agricultural sources to rivers in Scotland, reported at Water Framework Directive (WFD) catchment scale. The sources of pollutants include: urban, woodland, montane areas, river bank erosion, septic tanks and sewage treatment works. Loads are estimated based upon available data (e.g. septic tank licences) and modelling (bank erosion). The values specify phosphorous, nitrogen or sediment losses in kilograms per year and faecal coliform in 10^6 colony forming units (cfu) per year.\n\n","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"fac703a1-e65f-44fe-a3e5-ca4014fefb53","impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Faecal Indicator Organisms"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Richard","R.","S.","L.","D."],"familyName":["Gooday","Anthony","Calrow","Harris","Skirvin"],"fullName":["Gooday, R.","Anthony, S.","Calrow, L.","Harris, D.","Skirvin, D."],"keyword":["Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Faecal Indicator Organisms","Pollution","water quality","river","faecal bacterium","sediment","nitrogen","phosphorus","pollution"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution"],"keywordsOther":["water quality","river","faecal bacterium","sediment","nitrogen","phosphorus","pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Non-agricultural pollutant emissions were calculated for each WFD waterbody on the basis of tabulated discharges and empirical models. Losses from septic tanks were derived from SEPA licensing records and per capita coefficients, whilst losses from sewage treatment works were derived from consented dry weather flows and average concentrations from compliance monitoring. Losses from urban areas were calculated using the Event Mean Concentration model of [1] whilst montane and woodland losses were calculated using the PLUS and MARS models ([2] and [3] respectively). Losses from bank erosion were calculated using a simple index of bank erosion that was calibrated against available sediment tracing data.\n\n[1] Mitchell, G. Lockyer, J. and McDonald, A.T. (2001) Pollution hazard from urban nonpoint sources: a GIS-model to support strategic environmental planning in the UK. Technical Report, School of Geography, University of Leeds, UK.\n[2] Donnelly, D., Booth, P., Ferrier, R. and Futter, M. 2011. Phosphorus Land Use and Slope (PLUS+) Model. User Guide and Computer Code. Report to SEPA, Scotland, UK. 39 pp. Availalble from http://www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/Plus+%20User%20Guide%20-%20v1_6.pdf\n[3] Hughes, G., Lord, E., Wilson, L., Gooday, R. and Anthony, S. (2008) Updating previous estimates of the load and source apportionment of nitrogen to waters in the United Kingdom. Defra project WQ0111, final Report, 112 pp.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["ADAS UK Ltd","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/eb73ca31-7eb9-479c-96be-6063e29c8a7f","10.5285/eb73ca31-7eb9-479c-96be-6063e29c8a7f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/006d11e04","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["The WFD catchments are not published by SEPA yet however, it is SEPA's intention to add the WFD catchment dataset to its Environmental data page. In the meantime, the WFD catchment shapefile can be requested from SEPA"],"supplementalName":["Water Framework  Directive (WFD) catchments for Scotland"],"title":"Non-agricultural pollution to rivers in Scotland ","topic":["0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of annual loads of phosphorus, sediment, nitrogen and faecal coliform from non-agricultural sources to rivers in Scotland, reported at Water Framework Directive (WFD) catchment scale. The sources of pollutants include: urban, woodland, montane areas, river..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE provides apportionment of annual loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and fine-grained sediment, from both diffuse (agriculture, urban, river channel banks, atmospheric deposition, groundwater) and point (sewage treatment works, septic tanks, combined sewer overflows, storm tanks) sources to rivers at Water Framework Directive waterbody scale. The data cover individual and accumulated waterbodies.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"427bf467-002a-477f-a227-8dd4950d0b47","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Sediment","Regional","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Land use","Confidence levels","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/427bf467-002a-477f-a227-8dd4950d0b47"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SEPARATE (SEctor Pollutant AppoRtionment for the AquaTic Environment)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-06-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Estimates of discharged loads of nitrogen, phosphorous and fine-grained sediments to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, reported at Water Framework Directive catchment scale, from the SEctor Pollutant AppoRtionment for the AquaTic Environment (SEPARATE) modelling framework [1].\n\nThe SEPARATE framework integrates information on pollutant emissions from multiple sources to provide apportionment and summarises these estimates on the basis of the WFD cycle 2 waterbodies for England and Wales.\n\nThe estimated loads are expressed as tonnes per year. Sources are both diffuse and point sources. Diffuse sources include agriculture, urban, river channel banks, atmospheric deposition; point sources include sewage treatment works, septic tanks, combined sewer overflows, storm tanks. The pollutant loads and percentages are given as cumulative values with the values from the upstream catchment. Phosphorous is reported both as dissolved phosphorous and total phosphorous.\n\n[1] Zhang, Y.; Collins, A.L.; Murdoch, N.; Lee, D.; Naden, P.S. (2014) Cross sector contributions to river pollution in England and Wales: Updating waterbody scale information to support policy delivery for the Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, pp 16-32. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.010","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"a26e2127-8a20-49a4-8f57-d5e78cd55231","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","National"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Adie","Dave"],"familyName":["Collins","Skirvin"],"fullName":["Collins, A.","Skirvin, D."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","Catchment","National","River Flow and Networks","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Sediment","Modelling","Pollution"],"keywordsTheme":["Modelling","Pollution"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"This dataset is from the SEPARATE framework, which is based upon data from the period spanning from 2010 to 2012. Main input datasets include: 2010 June Agricultural Survey, 2010 British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (BSFP), elevation data, soil classification, meteorological data, river flow data, and river network outline. Further information given in [1].\n\nAlthough the pollutant emissions are summarised by WFD cycle 2 catchment, the results for individual waterbodies with areas <25 km2 should be treated with caution. This amounts to approximately 43% of the waterbodies across England and Wales and primarily reflects issues associated with the accuracy of statistical or regionally averaged data used to drive the emission layers including those for the agricultural sector. \n\n[1] Zhang, Y.; Collins, A.L.; Murdoch, N.; Lee, D.; Naden, P.S. (2014) Cross sector contributions to river pollution in England and Wales: Updating waterbody scale information to support policy delivery for the Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, pp 16-32. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.010","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"organisation":["Rothamsted Research","ADAS","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8dc7c876-90ca-4886-bd0a-9b3a99b09f64"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/0347fy350","https://ror.org/006d11e04","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Zhang, Y.; Collins, A.L.; Murdoch, N.; Lee, D.; Naden, P.S. (2014) Cross sector contributions to river pollution in England and Wales: Updating waterbody scale information to support policy delivery for the Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, pp 16-32. "],"supplementalName":["WFD Surface Water Management Catchments Cycle 2"],"title":"Source apportionment of annual nutrient and sediment loads to rivers in England and Wales, from the SEPARATE framework","topic":["0/Modelling/","0/Pollution/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Estimates of discharged loads of nitrogen, phosphorous and fine-grained sediments to rivers in England and Wales from multiple sector sources, reported at Water Framework Directive catchment scale, from the SEctor Pollutant AppoRtionment for the AquaTic Environment..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"QUESTOR represents a river as a series of river reaches within which physical, chemical and biological processes operate.. The initial selection of reaches is based on the location of \tconfluences, diffuse (catchment) sources, discharge points, abstraction points, monitoring sites, and weirs. Once this has been done, long reaches, say those greater than 10km, can be sub-divided. The flow and water quality out of a reach are calculated based on a mass balance of flows into the head of the reach plus contributions from point sources and diffuse sources minus abstractions. The determinands and processes modelled are not fixed within the QUESTOR modelling environment, but are tailored to the particular application. The QUESTOR model has sets of equations to simulates nitrogen and phosphorus species, pH and suspended sediment, the aspects of water quality of particular interest are those determinands indicative of the impacts on the river ecosystem, namely temperature, chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), BOD and DO. Chl-a is used as a surrogate for the algae using a fixed stoichiometry model whereby the ratio chl-a:C:N:P is 1:50:10:1. The growth of algae is limited by light, temperature and nutrient concentrations.  The model was developed to help catchment managers assess the impact of their actions e.g. changing discharges consents, abstracting more water from a river or building a flood relief channel. The aim was to produce a physically realistic representation of a number of important measures of river water quality while being practical to run using generally available datasets. \nQUESTOR is based on the earlier in-stream water quality models IHQM (Institute of Hydrology water Quality Model) and QUASAR (Quality Simulation Along Rivers). QUASAR was sold commercially for both VAX and PC systems, and is now available free of charge, but unsupported, as PC-QUASAR. The model formulation of the \"basic\" version of QUESTOR corresponds broadly with QUASAR.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"53f3d4fd-8f62-4d35-a232-053a4e961ba0","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Management outcome","Confidence levels"],"impScale":["River reach","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","River flow and networks","Climate scenarios"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","River reach","River flow and networks","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Biological quality"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/53f3d4fd-8f62-4d35-a232-053a4e961ba0"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"QUESTOR  (Quality Evaluation and Simulation Tool for River Systems)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"QUESTOR represents a river as a series of river reaches within which physical, chemical and biological processes operate.. The initial selection of reaches is based on the location of \tconfluences, diffuse (catchment) sources, discharge points, abstraction points, monitoring..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Dataset of 1076 sediment monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including medium (river, marine and estuarine); purpose of the monitoring (Water Framework Directive [1], Controlled Activities Regulations [1] and Clean Seas Environmental Monitoring Programme); analytic function (including organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, metals chemistry, marine biology and invertebrates), and approximate annual frequency of the monitoring.\n\n[1] \"What Water regulations apply in Scotland?\" SEPA. http://www.sepa.org.uk/regulations/water/. Checked 04/10-2016\n\n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"fc49aa01-16b9-44da-8d14-92be06a93c66","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Water Use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Water Use","Sediment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Unknown","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["Scottish Environment Protection Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/fc49aa01-16b9-44da-8d14-92be06a93c66"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"SEPA Sediment Monitoring sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset of 1076 sediment monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including medium (river,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"more to come","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ad5d449a-ffe5-4681-b3be-8336cb9ca6eb","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","River flow and networks","Regional","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Confidence levels","Climate Change","Catchment","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ad5d449a-ffe5-4681-b3be-8336cb9ca6eb"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"DTT (Dynamic Typology Tool)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"more to come"},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage and local output suitable for stakeholder engagement in study areas. Application of the tool can aid identification, targeting and prioritisation of land-use opportunities for management of water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e534c7cc-d2fb-47e6-8ace-36ced5f9af48","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e534c7cc-d2fb-47e6-8ace-36ced5f9af48"],"resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 7: Interpolation of model outputs and data from catchment to national scales and monitored to non-monitored sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage..."}],"facets":[{"fieldName":"resourceType","displayName":"Resource type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Case Study","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=resourceType%7CCase+Study","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Dataset","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=resourceType%7CDataset","active":false,"count":122},{"name":"Model (UKCEH)","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=resourceType%7CModel+%28UKCEH%29","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impCaMMPIssues","displayName":"CaMMP Issues","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Climate Change","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CClimate+Change","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Confidence levels","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CConfidence+levels","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Cost Effectiveness","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CCost+Effectiveness","active":false,"count":3},{"name":"Management outcome","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome","active":false,"count":12},{"name":"Other Services","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7COther+Services","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Pollution Source","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CPollution+Source","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Transferability","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CTransferability","active":false,"count":13}]},{"fieldName":"impDataType","displayName":"Data Type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Geospatial / Map","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impDataType%7CGeospatial+%2F+Map","active":false,"count":69},{"name":"Tabular","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impDataType%7CTabular","active":false,"count":42},{"name":"Time Series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impDataType%7CTime+Series","active":false,"count":37},{"name":"Time series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impDataType%7CTime+series","active":false,"count":5}]},{"fieldName":"impScale","displayName":"Scale","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":47},{"name":"Farm","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CFarm","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Field","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CField","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"National","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":93},{"name":"Plot","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CPlot","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Regional","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRegional","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"River Reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7CRiver+Reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"River reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":10},{"name":"catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impScale%7Ccatchment","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"national","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":3}]},{"fieldName":"impTopic","displayName":"Topic","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Administration Units","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CAdministration+Units","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Agricultural Practices","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CAgricultural+Practices","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Air Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CAir+Quality","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Biodiversity","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CBiodiversity","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Catchments and Topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+Topography","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"Catchments and topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+topography","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Climate Scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+Scenarios","active":false,"count":8},{"name":"Climate scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+scenarios","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Geology","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CGeology","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+Gas+Fluxes","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Greenhouse gas fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+gas+fluxes","active":false,"count":5},{"name":"Land Cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Cover","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Land Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Use","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Land cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CLand+cover","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Land use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CLand+use","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural Pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+Pollution","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+pollution","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"River Flow and Networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+Flow+and+Networks","active":false,"count":17},{"name":"River flow and networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+flow+and+networks","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Site Specific Data","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CSite+Specific+Data","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Soil","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CSoil","active":false,"count":18},{"name":"Water Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Quality","active":false,"count":44},{"name":"Water Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Use","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Water quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CWater+quality","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Weather","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impTopic%7CWeather","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impWaterPollutant","displayName":"Water Pollutant","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Biological Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+Quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Biological quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Faecal Indicator Organisms","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CFaecal+Indicator+Organisms","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Metaldehyde","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CMetaldehyde","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Nitrogen","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","active":true,"count":33},{"name":"Phosphorous","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorous","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Phosphorus","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":30},{"name":"Sediment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach&facet=impScale%7Cnational&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":true,"count":17}]}],"order":"asc"}