{"numFound":131,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?page=2&facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","results":[{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"more to come","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ad5d449a-ffe5-4681-b3be-8336cb9ca6eb","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels","Climate Change"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","River flow and networks","Regional","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Confidence levels","Climate Change","Catchment","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ad5d449a-ffe5-4681-b3be-8336cb9ca6eb"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"DTT (Dynamic Typology Tool)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"more to come"},{"authorAffiliation":["Defra"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (BSFP) is an annual survey based on the selection each year of a representative sample (c1500) of farms from mainland Britain. The survey is the primary source of information regarding the application of organic and inorganic fertiliser in Great Britain. The first time results were integrated into one report for Great Britain was 1992, before this each country (England and Wales from 1942, Scotland from 1983) had their own report which ran parallel to each other. The main purpose of the survey is to estimate average application rates of nitrogen, phosphate and potash for a wide range of crops and grassland. Information is also collected on applications of sulphur fertilisers, organic manures and lime. Within the later surveys there is also analysis of longer term trends in fertiliser use.\nThe main sections currently contained within the BSFP include:-\n\nSection A - The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice - This is an introduction to the survey and a outline of the structure. Section A of the report also goes into large detail about the survey methodology and general trends and issues in the year in question (e.g. crop areas and weather)\n\nSection B1 - Commentary on fertiliser use in Great Britain - This is the main section of the report and gives the yearly overview of fertiliser results and trends from recent history. The section then gives separate details on the use of fertiliser (N,P,K,S) on tillage crops and grassland.\n\nSection B2 - Commentary on fertiliser use in Great Britain - Analysis of the longer trends in fertiliser use in Great Britain split into sections on nitrogen, phosphate and potash.\n\nSection C - Tables detailing the fertiliser use for Great Britain, plus separate data for England and Wales and for Scotland. Data include rates and proportions receiving fertiliser by crop type, by farm type, by fertiliser type.\n\nSection D - Use of Organic Materials - Information on farm handling and use of organic manures and the fertiliser value of organic manures. This section only came into the survey in 2007. \n\nSection E - Spreading precision, record keeping, nutrient management plans - Farmers asked a series of questions about the care taken in application of fertilisers and manures and in record keeping. This section was created in 2013 as it was within section D previously when only related to organic manures.\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"d879b7fc-4716-4965-aa47-eb0ec0b03972","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Agriculture","Fertiliser","Tabular","National","Agricultural Practices","Nitrogen","Phosphorous"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"In 2000 to help improve the survey response and to reduce the year-on-year variability, a core of respondents agreed to complete the survey for a number of years. Following on from this in 2006 and 2007 a review of the panel structure was undertaken to ensure that the proportion of respondents who had participated on the panel for five consecutive years or more constituted no more than 20% of the total sample. In the 2014 survey 70% of the sample had responded in the previous year. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["Defra"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/d879b7fc-4716-4965-aa47-eb0ec0b03972"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (1992-2015)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice (BSFP) is an annual survey based on the selection each year of a representative sample (c1500) of farms from mainland Britain. The survey is the primary source of information regarding the application of organic and inorganic..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-02-05T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["IHU Catchments"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["F.","M.","H."],"authorFamilyName":["Kral","Fry","Dixon"],"authorFullName":["Kral, F.","Fry, M.","Dixon, H."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. This dataset was derived from the Integrated Hydrological Terrain Model. A Catchment represents the full area upstream from a Section outlet, which is a cell upstream of a confluence of two watercourses with known names. While Sections do not overlap, Catchments can overlap because one Catchment contains Catchments for all upstream Sections. This layer currently covers Great Britain only as no dataset with river geometries and names with suitable detail is available for Northern Ireland.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"d1796fe9-9187-44f5-9756-b7cdb9a817d1","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Matt","F.","M.","H."],"familyName":["Fry","Kral","Dixon"],"fullName":["Fry, M.","Kral, F.","Dixon, H."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchments and Topography","United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland","Hydrology","catchment","watershed","hydrology"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland"],"keywordsTheme":["Hydrology"],"keywordsOther":["catchment","watershed","hydrology"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The main inputs for development of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK were data held by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Specifically, the cumulative catchment area raster and outflow raster from the Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) [1]. The vast majority of the watercourse names come from the subset of CEH UK river centreline network enriched by names from Ordnance Survey 1:50K Gazetteer [2]. Some names were obtained from or verified using other readily available sources like OpenStreetMap (openstreetmap.org) and WikiPedia (wikipedia.org). Bespoke FORTRAN functions, part of the CEH Flood Estimation Handbook code set, were used for catchment delineation. These functions enable sensible interlocking catchments boundaries to be created for the whole IHDTM surface. The option that does not leave gaps between catchments was specified [1]. Except for the catchment delineation, ArcGIS was used as the main GIS platform. Custom Python code was developed to drive the whole process and to perform hierarchical and network tasks. The full name of each IHU Section was derived from three rivers defining the section: the largest (in terms of cumulative catchment area) inflowing river other than the main river in the Section, the main river in the Section, and the largest river flowing into the downstream Section. If no such inflows exist, words'Source', 'Sea', or the name of the main river in the downstream Section are used as appropriate. A similar approach was adopted for IHU Group names, although group names were edited manually to a great extent to ensure they are simple and readily understood.\n\n[1] Morris, D.G. and Flavin, R.W. 1990. A Digital Terrain Model for Hydrology. Proc 4th Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Zurich, 1, 250-262.\n[2] Moore R V, Morris D G and Flavin R W, 1994. Sub-set of UK digital 1:50,000 scale river centreline network. NERC, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1425380855141","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/10d419c8-8f65-4b85-a78a-3d6e0485fa1f","10.5285/10d419c8-8f65-4b85-a78a-3d6e0485fa1f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["National River Flow Archive website providing access to river flow data downloads as well as contact information for the NRFA enquirers service which provides other datasets and monthly, annual and occasional reports on river flow conditions."],"supplementalName":["National River Flow Archive website"],"title":"Integrated Hydrological Units of the United Kingdom: Catchments","topic":["0/Hydrology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. This dataset was derived from the Integrated Hydrological Terrain..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Daily precipitation and temperature time series spanning from 1950-2006 (Haylock et al., 2008). The dataset were created on a 0.25 and 0.5 degree regular latitude-longitude grid and on a 0.22 and 0.44 degree rotated pole grid.\n\nThe ENSEMBLES project researched climate change and its impacts in Europe. Beside the meteorological variables described above, it produced a set of simulations at seasonal-decadal and centennial timescales using global and regional climate models (see ENSEMBLE final report [1]). \n\nInformation about the datasets and how to access them is described in Appendix 2 of the final report [1]\n\n[1] van der Linden P., and J.F.B. Mitchell (eds.) 2009: ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts: Summary of research\nand results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK. 160pp.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"5df3f550-d523-42fa-8047-58a8a737d3d3","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Information about the datasets and how to access them is described in Appendix 2 of the final report [1]","locations":["POLYGON((-25 34.04, -25 70.475, 44.063 70.475, 44.063 34.04, -25 34.04))"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/5df3f550-d523-42fa-8047-58a8a737d3d3"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Gridded daily precipitation and temperature for Europe (1950-2006) [EU ENSEMBLES]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Daily precipitation and temperature time series spanning from 1950-2006 (Haylock et al., 2008). The dataset were created on a 0.25 and 0.5 degree regular latitude-longitude grid and on a 0.22 and 0.44 degree rotated pole grid.\n\nThe ENSEMBLES project researched climate..."},{"authorAffiliation":["Met Office"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Evaporation and soil moisture deficit for the UK calculated by MO using meteorological observations. The output can be for a single site or as averaged over 40 x 40 km grid which cover the UK. The data can be supplied at daily, weekly or monthly time resolution. ","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"b9155463-ac86-4e19-a24f-57cef6b79505","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","Time Series","National","Climate Scenarios","Weather"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"MORECS evapotranspiration and soil moisture deficit is calculated from daily values of hours of sunshine, air temperature, vapour pressure, wind speed and rainfall. For further details see Hough and Jones (1997). For further details see [1]\n\n[1] Hough, M. N. and Jones, R. J. A.: The United Kingdom Meteorological Office rainfall and evaporation calculation system: MORECS version 2.0-an overview, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 227-239, doi:10.5194/hess-1-227-1997, 1997. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["Met Office","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b9155463-ac86-4e19-a24f-57cef6b79505"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"state":"published","title":"Meteorological Office Rainfall and Evaporation Calculation System (MORECS version 2.0) ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Evaporation and soil moisture deficit for the UK calculated by MO using meteorological observations. The output can be for a single site or as averaged over 40 x 40 km grid which cover the UK. The data can be supplied at daily, weekly or monthly time resolution. "},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Daily mean river flow, a.k.a. gauged daily flows (GDF), measured at over 1500 points on the river network across Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Most stations are managed by the Measuring Authorities (Environment Agency, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Wales and the Rivers Agency of Northern Ireland), and the daily flows are generally the average of the raw 15 minute series. GDF values are expressed as cubic metres per second (abbreviated to m3s-1 and sometimes also referred to as cumecs) in a water-day (09.00 to 09.00 GMT) or, where indicated, a calendar day. The National River Flow Archive also holds detailed information about river gauging stations and their catchments.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"74bc38fb-3e93-43a3-b93a-c64571df44f0","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","National","River Flow and Networks","Water Quality"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Gaugin stations are operated by the measuring authorities, which include the Environment Agency (EA), the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), Natural Resources Wales and the Northern Ireland Rivers Agency. Measuring authorities typically calculate river flows on the basis of measurements at 15-minute intervals. These high resolution data are used to calculate the mean gauged daily flow. These mean daily data are submitted to the National River Flow Archive (NRFA), which quality controls and archive the data.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648393 49.86382, -8.648393 60.86099, 1.767549 60.86099, 1.767549 49.86382, -8.648393 49.86382))"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/74bc38fb-3e93-43a3-b93a-c64571df44f0"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"National River Flow Archive daily flow data","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Daily mean river flow, a.k.a. gauged daily flows (GDF), measured at over 1500 points on the river network across Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Most stations are managed by the Measuring Authorities (Environment Agency, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE provides apportionment of annual loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and fine-grained sediment, from both diffuse (agriculture, urban, river channel banks, atmospheric deposition, groundwater) and point (sewage treatment works, septic tanks, combined sewer overflows, storm tanks) sources to rivers at Water Framework Directive waterbody scale. The data cover individual and accumulated waterbodies.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"427bf467-002a-477f-a227-8dd4950d0b47","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Pollution Source","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Regional","National","Catchment","national"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Non-agricultural pollution","Land use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Tabular","Sediment","Regional","Pollution Source","Phosphorus","Non-agricultural pollution","Nitrogen","National","Land use","Confidence levels","Catchment"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/427bf467-002a-477f-a227-8dd4950d0b47"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"SEPARATE (SEctor Pollutant AppoRtionment for the AquaTic Environment)","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"National scale nutrient and sediment source apportionment screening tool for England and Wales developed originally as part of Defra project WQ0223 (Developing a field toolkit for ecological targeting of agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation measures). SEPARATE..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-02-03T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["IHU Groups"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["F.","M.","H."],"authorFamilyName":["Kral","Fry","Dixon"],"authorFullName":["Kral, F.","Fry, M.","Dixon, H."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. Groups represent the intermediate units of IHU in terms of spatial resolution. The most common size of a group is around 400 square kilometres. Each Group carries a name constructed from names of the major river flowing through the Group, the major river flowing into the Group, the major river into which the Group flows, and sometimes also from local county names. Each Group consists of one or more Section and Groups can be combined to form Hydrometric Areas without Coastline. Identifiers and attributes have been calculated so that direct upstream and direct downstream IHU units can be selected. This layer currently covers Great Britain only as no dataset with river geometries and names with suitable detail is available for Northern Ireland.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"9624a106-6d1f-477e-9bc8-195ff26e9176","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Catchments and Topography"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Matt","F.","M.","H."],"familyName":["Fry","Kral","Dixon"],"fullName":["Fry, M.","Kral, F.","Dixon, H."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Catchments and Topography","United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland","Hydrology","hydrology","watershed","catchment"],"keywordsPlace":["United Kingdom","Great Britain","England","Wales","Scotland"],"keywordsTheme":["Hydrology"],"keywordsOther":["hydrology","watershed","catchment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The main inputs for development of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK were data held by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Specifically, the cumulative catchment area raster and outflow raster from the Integrated Hydrological Digital Terrain Model (IHDTM) [1]. The vast majority of the watercourse names come from the subset of CEH UK river centreline network enriched by names from Ordnance Survey 1:50K Gazetteer [2]. Some names were obtained from or verified using other readily available sources like OpenStreetMap (openstreetmap.org) and WikiPedia (wikipedia.org). Bespoke FORTRAN functions, part of the CEH Flood Estimation Handbook code set, were used for catchment delineation. These functions enable sensible interlocking catchments boundaries to be created for the whole IHDTM surface. The option that does not leave gaps between catchments was specified [1]. Except for the catchment delineation, ArcGIS was used as the main GIS platform. Custom Python code was developed to drive the whole process and to perform hierarchical and network tasks. The full name of each IHU Section was derived from three rivers defining the section: the largest (in terms of cumulative catchment area) inflowing river other than the main river in the Section, the main river in the Section, and the largest river flowing into the downstream Section. If no such inflows exist, words 'Source', 'Sea', or the name of the main river in the downstream Section are used as appropriate. A similar approach was adopted for IHU Group names, although group names were edited manually to a great extent to ensure they are simple and readily understood. \n\n[1] Morris, D.G. and Flavin, R.W. 1990. A Digital Terrain Model for Hydrology. Proc 4th Int. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Zurich, 1, 250-262.\n[2] Moore R V, Morris D G and Flavin R W, 1994. Sub-set of UK digital 1:50,000 scale river centreline network. NERC, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-063X"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1425380901992","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f1cd5e33-2633-4304-bbc2-b8d34711d902","10.5285/f1cd5e33-2633-4304-bbc2-b8d34711d902"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["National River Flow Archive website providing access to river flow data downloads as well as contact information for the NRFA enquirers service which provides other datasets and monthly, annual and occasional reports on river flow conditions."],"supplementalName":["NRFA website"],"title":"Integrated Hydrological Units of the United Kingdom: Groups","topic":["0/Hydrology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset is part of Integrated Hydrological Units (IHU) of the UK, a set of geographical reference units for hydrological purposes including river flow measurement and hydrometric data collection. Groups represent the intermediate units of IHU in terms of spatial..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-11-05T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of Birmingham"],"authorGivenName":["D.","P.","R.","E.","I.","J.","C.I.","N."],"authorFamilyName":["Leach","Henville","Wyatt","Hewitt","Morrissey","Weller","Tindall","Bachiller-Jareno"],"authorFullName":["Leach, D.","Henville, P.","Wyatt, R.","Hewitt, E.","Morrissey, I.","Weller, J.","Tindall, C.I.","Bachiller-Jareno, N."],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/03angcq70"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Rainwater alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients data from the Frome Piddle; Pang Lambourn and Tern catchments, recorded between 2004 and 2006. Rainwater samples were collected fortnightly at seven sites in these catchments and analysed for Alkalinity pH 4.5, Ammonia, Chloride-ion, Conductivity 20 °C, Nitrate, pH, Phosphorus soluble reactive (SRP), Silicate reactive dissolved (SRD) and Sulphate. The samples were collected as part of the NERC funded Lowland Catchment Research (LOCAR) Programme to provide comparable baseline rainwater chemistry data across the LOCAR catchments.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"6a237b76-bee9-4a75-a237-04841cc36d5e","impDataType":["Tabular","Time Series"],"impScale":["Catchment"],"impTopic":["Water Quality"],"impWaterPollutant":["Nitrogen","Phosphorus"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Nuria ","D.","P.","R.","E.","I.","J.","C.I.","N."],"familyName":["Bachiller Jareno","Leach","Henville","Wyatt","Hewitt","Morrissey","Weller","Tindall","Bachiller-Jareno"],"fullName":["Bachiller Jareno, N.","Leach, D.","Henville, P.","Wyatt, R.","Hewitt, E.","Morrissey, I.","Weller, J.","Tindall, C.I.","Bachiller-Jareno, N."],"keyword":["Tabular","Time Series","Catchment","Water Quality","Nitrogen","Phosphorus","Water quality","The Lowland Catchment Research Programme","LOCAR","rainwater"],"keywordsTheme":["Water quality"],"keywordsOther":["The Lowland Catchment Research Programme","LOCAR","rainwater"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The rainwater collector was brought back to the lab by the Catchment Service Team in that catchment and used to fill a number of bottles supplied by Thames Water Laboratory. Samples for pH and alkalinity readings were poured into a glass bottle. Samples for Phosphorus soluble reactive were filtered. Unfiltered samples were used for the rest of the determinands. Samples were then sent to Thames Water for analysis. They used the Seal discrete analyser to determine values for Alkalinity pH 4.5, Ammonia, Chloride-ion, Nitrate, Phosphorus soluble reactive (SRP), Silicate reactive dissolved (SRD) and Sulphate. pH and Conductivity probes were used for those two determinands. A duplicate and a QC sample were sent each week to Thames Water to compare results obtained by the laboratories. The data were quality controlled by Thames Water. The data from the Frome Piddle catchment do not have a time associated with them. The time was not recorded when the rainwater collector was brought back from the field. In the dataset this is represented by the value 00:00. A zip file containing box-and-whisker plots for each determinand, showing the range of values (median, inter-quartile range, 1.5 * inter-quartile range, outliers) recorded at each site is available to enable prospective users of the data to understand data quality. ","locations":["POLYGON((-3 50.5, -3 53.2, -0.8 53.2, -0.8 50.5, -3 50.5))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","University of Birmingham","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1426780628758","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/274b541c-ee28-4041-8d3a-be5e970cd74e","10.5285/274b541c-ee28-4041-8d3a-be5e970cd74e"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/03angcq70","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Field measurements of alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients in rainwater (2004-2006) [LOCAR]","topic":["0/Water quality/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Rainwater alkalinity, chloride-ion, conductivity, pH and nutrients data from the Frome Piddle; Pang Lambourn and Tern catchments, recorded between 2004 and 2006. Rainwater samples were collected fortnightly at seven sites in these catchments and analysed for Alkalinity..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-11-08T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Wensum Alliance"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Continuous measurements of rainfall (in mm) from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, recorded between 2010 and 2015. Continuous recording rain gauges were installed at 6 sites in the catchment to record sub-hourly rainfall data, which has been aggregated to an hourly resolution throughout the monitoring period. A potential error check is also included, to highlight any possible errors associated with the record. ","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"fca2fd11-cc9a-4771-b1d1-36073ec087e6","impDataType":["Tabular"],"impScale":["Catchment","River Reach"],"impTopic":["Weather"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Tabular","Catchment","River Reach","Weather"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The Wensum DTC has a monitoring network installed to measure meteorological, hydrological and hydrochemical parameters in target sub-catchments. This statement aims to describe the in-situ monitoring equipment, methods and protocols performed on our data before it is published on the archive. Quality assurance and quality control procedures Quality assurance (QA) procedures are followed during data collection, detailed with our monitoring equipment. Regular maintenance activities are carried out at a weekly frequency and involve cleaning of flow-through cells, clearing of in-channel vegetation and debris where stage is monitored and cleaning of rain gauges. All field work and maintenance activities are entered into maintenance logs for each site, which are used during data quality control (QC) procedures. QC procedures include the validation of high-frequency nutrient data using point samples in the Blackwater sub catchment. These samples are analysed in laboratories following standard methods. Inter-laboratory comparisons are used to check consistency in analytical procedures between sub-catchments. QC procedures also include the identification of errors in all data sets. Errors flagged as critical include: periods of maintenance when data may be unrepresentative; equipment of power failures; or data below limits of detection. On-site visits by field staff are recorded in a maintenance log which is checked against the data during the quality control (QC) post-processing. Any data likely to be disturbed by the routine field work are removed, along with any known periods of downtime, hence some of the data is not included and there may be time breaks in the files accessible on the archive. The Wensum DTC’s weather station data has been corrected for issues predominantly associated with the anemometer, hence some of the data is not included and there may be time breaks in the files accessible on the archive. Rain gauge data on the archive contains a quality check to ensure that the data has been matched with other rain gauge measurements, ensuring its validity. This and other periods of downtime are shown by a potential error associated with each measurement at an hourly resolution.","locations":["POLYGON((1.0791389 52.77318, 1.0791389 52.806997, 1.2012908 52.806997, 1.2012908 52.77318, 1.0791389 52.77318))"],"organisation":["Wensum Alliance"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/fca2fd11-cc9a-4771-b1d1-36073ec087e6"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Continuous measurement of rainfall (2010-2015) [Wensum DTC]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Continuous measurements of rainfall (in mm) from the Wensum Demonstration Test Catchment, in Norfolk, recorded between 2010 and 2015. Continuous recording rain gauges were installed at 6 sites in the catchment to record sub-hourly rainfall data, which has been aggregated..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Dataset of 88 waste monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including: medium (liquid waste, solid waste and mixed media waste); purpose of the monitoring (action plan, waste management licence, PPC permit and atmospheric input impact); and approximate annual frequency of the monitoring.\n\nMonitoring data itself can be requested from SEPA.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"61d6d91d-9b23-4083-97a7-9d1277048762","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Non-agricultural Pollution"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Non-agricultural Pollution"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Unknown","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["Scottish Environmental Protection Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/61d6d91d-9b23-4083-97a7-9d1277048762"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"SEPA Waste Monitoring sites ","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset of 88 waste monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including: medium (liquid waste,..."},{"publicationDate":"2008-06-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["HWSD"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"30 arc-second grid database with over 16,000 different soil mapping units that combines existing regional and national updates of soil information worldwide (SOTER, ESD, Soil Map of China, WISE) with the information contained within the 1:5,000,000 scale FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World (FAO, 1971-1981). The resulting raster database consists of 21600 rows and 43200 columns, which are linked to harmonized soil property data. The use of a standardized structure allows for the linkage of the attribute data with the raster map to display or query the composition in terms of soil units and the characterization of selected soil parameters (organic Carbon, pH, water storage capacity, soil depth, cation exchange capacity of the soil and the clay fraction, total exchangeable nutrients, lime and gypsum contents, sodium exchange percentage, salinity, textural class and granulometry). \n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"f3b58893-1c2b-4419-930b-c633230c04cf","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Soil"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Tabular","National","Soil"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The data set's lineage is described in: FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC 2012. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2), Prepared by Nachtergaele FO, van Velthuizen H, Verelst L and Wiberg D. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), ISRIC - World Soil Information, Institute of Soil Science - Chinese Academy of Sciences (IISCAS), Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC), Laxenburg, Austria (http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/External-World-soil-database/HWSD_Documentation.pdf). \nReliability of the information contained in the database is variable: the parts of the database that still make use of the Soil Map of the World such as North America, Australia, West Africa and South Asia are considered less reliable, while most of the areas covered by SOTER databases are considered to have the highest reliability (Southern Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Central and Eastern Europe).","locations":["POLYGON((-180 -90, -180 90, 180 90, 180 -90, -180 -90))"],"organisation":["FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, JRC","International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f3b58893-1c2b-4419-930b-c633230c04cf"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Harmonised world soil database","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"30 arc-second grid database with over 16,000 different soil mapping units that combines existing regional and national updates of soil information worldwide (SOTER, ESD, Soil Map of China, WISE) with the information contained within the 1:5,000,000 scale FAO-UNESCO..."},{"publicationDate":"1993-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["Land Cover Map of Great Britain (1km dominant target class, GB)","LCMGB (1km dominant target class, GB)"],"authorAffiliation":["Institute of Terrestrial Ecology"],"authorGivenName":["R.M.","G.B.","A.R.","A.G."],"authorFamilyName":["Fuller","Groom","Jones","Thomson"],"authorFullName":["Fuller, R.M.","Groom, G.B.","Jones, A.R.","Thomson, A.G."],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Land Cover Map of Great Britain 1990 (1km dominant target class, GB), is a raster digital dataset, providing classification of land cover types into 25 classes, at a 1km resolution. The dataset consists of a 1km grid with a full set of the 25 target classes (or 'sub' classes). Each 1km contains the dominant habitat class, derived from a higher resolution (25m) dataset. The map was produced using supervised maximum likelihood classifications of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper satellite data. The 25 mapped classes include sea and inland waters, bare, suburban and urban areas, arable farmland, pastures and meadows, rough grass, grass heaths and moors, bracken, dwarf shrub heaths and moorland, scrub, deciduous and evergreen woodland, and upland and lowland bogs. It can potentially be used to plan, manage or monitor agriculture, ecology, conservation, forestry, environmental assessment, water supplies, urban spread, transport, telecommunications, recreation and mineral extraction. The map was produced in the early 1990s by a forerunner of the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, at Monks Wood.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"1f7c3a98-ef48-4db0-a924-421aa15f998a","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Land Cover"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Dan","R.M.","G.B.","A.R.","A.G."],"familyName":["Morton","Fuller","Groom","Jones","Thomson"],"fullName":["Morton, D.","Fuller, R.M.","Groom, G.B.","Jones, A.R.","Thomson, A.G."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Land Cover","Great Britain","England","Scotland","Wales","Land cover","land cover","habitat"],"keywordsPlace":["Great Britain","England","Scotland","Wales"],"keywordsTheme":["Land cover"],"keywordsOther":["land cover","habitat"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"The Land Cover Map of Great Britain (LCMGB) was produced (at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) Monks Wood) using supervised maximum likelihood classifications of Landsat Thematic Mapper satellite data See online supporting information for further details.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Natural Environment Research Council","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1287411168957","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/4e3fe599-1ae9-4dbb-9476-bfc74fe90b4e","10.5285/4e3fe599-1ae9-4dbb-9476-bfc74fe90b4e"],"resourceStatus":"Superseded","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02b5d8509","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Land Cover Map 1990 (1km dominant target class, GB)","topic":["0/Land cover/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"The Land Cover Map of Great Britain 1990 (1km dominant target class, GB), is a raster digital dataset, providing classification of land cover types into 25 classes, at a 1km resolution. The dataset consists of a 1km grid with a full set of the 25 target classes (or..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-09-24T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["EDINA Agcensus"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"EDINA agcensus data provides agricultural census data for England, Scotland and Wales at 2km, 5km or 10km grid square resolution. The Agricultural Census is conducted in June each year by the government departments dealing with Agriculture and Rural Affairs for Scotland, England, and Wales. Farmers are surveyed in each year via a postal questionnaire, with the farmer declaring the agricultural activity on their land. In Scotland the census covers all major agricultural holdings, but in England and Wales a stratified sample of holdings are surveyed. Data for non-surveyed farms is extrapolated from previous years and trends on comparable farms. The respective government departments publish information relating to farm holdings for recognised geographies for the 150 items of data. Algorithms developed by Edinburgh University Data Library convert small area data provided by the government department into grid squares of 2, 5 or 10 km. Dates covered: Great Britain: 1969-1994; England and Wales: 1969-1997; England: 2000-present; Wales: 2000-present; Scotland: 1969-present. The frequency of updating is dependent upon the respective government department collating and publishing the census data for each year prior to supplying EDINA with the data for their processing.\n\nEDINA data is a paid for service. There is a nominal fee per year for unlimited access for UK tertiary education institutions. Non-academic subscriptions are based on the number of potential users or on a per project basis.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"4ee12ebf-4d3c-4799-9cab-9657df75b35a","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Agricultural Practices"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Agricultural Practices","National","Geospatial / Map"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Annual census of agricultural and horticultural activities for England, Scotland and Wales is conducted on commercial holdings, defined as holdings of more than 5 ha agricultural land, 1 ha orchards, 0.5 ha vegetables or 0.1 ha of protected crops and ornamentals, or more than 10 cows, 50 pigs, 20 sheep, 20 goats or 1000 poultry. Note that these thresholds have only been in place since 2010. Each farmer declares the agricultural activity on the land via a postal questionnaire. Since the late 1990s the agricultural census in England and Wales has been conducted as a sample survey in which data is only sought from a proportion of holdings in each year, as low as 30% of commercial holdings in some years (approx. 30,000 holdings). Since 2007, cattle numbers have been taken from the Cattle Tracing Scheme. Data for non-surveyed farms are interpolated from the most recent data for those farms using the trends on comparable farms. \n The respective government departments collect the 150 items of data and publish information relating to farm holdings for recognised geographies. Edina converts the data obtained from the government departments into 2, 5 and 10 km grid square estimates. Edina uses algorithms which convert the data for recognised geographies, obtained from the government departments, into grid square estimates. The key to transforming the raw data into grid square data is the definition of each geography (e.g. parish, in the case of Scotland) in terms of 1km squares. Agricultural Census items are distributed over those 1km grid squares with the land use category suitable for the census item in question. The categories are defined by the Land use Framework, a 7-fold land-use classification of the same 1km grid squares (the seven land-use categories are agricultural land, upland, woodland, restricted agriculture - natural, restricted agriculture - artificial, urban, and inland water).","locations":["POLYGON((-6.4526 49.864, -6.4526 55.812, 1.7675 55.812, 1.7675 49.864, -6.4526 49.864))","POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))","POLYGON((-5.473 51.375, -5.473 53.434, -2.654 53.434, -2.654 51.375, -5.473 51.375))"],"organisation":["EDINA/Data Library Services"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/4ee12ebf-4d3c-4799-9cab-9657df75b35a"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"EDINA Agricultural Census for England, Wales and Scotland [Agcensus]","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"EDINA agcensus data provides agricultural census data for England, Scotland and Wales at 2km, 5km or 10km grid square resolution. The Agricultural Census is conducted in June each year by the government departments dealing with Agriculture and Rural Affairs for Scotland,..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-02-18T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Vegetation-specific 3-year average deposition data for nitrogen and sulphur from 2004. The data are based on a spatial resolution of 5x5km. All deposition values are the sum of wet, dry and cloud deposition and are expressed in kiloequivalents per hectare per year. Data is provided for two vegetation types: forest/woodland (the dataset assumes Norway Spruce everywhere in the grid square) and moorland/low growing vegetation (the data assumes low growing vegetation everywhere in the grid square).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"8f37b8d7-92f1-41f1-a980-2b729cb5a222","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Time Series"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Air Quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Time Series","National","Air Quality"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Deposition data are produced using the CBED model (Concentration Based Estimated Deposition). There has been a an important methodological change in the modelling which has been applied to the data from 2004 onwards, which means these data are not comparable with previously published data for those years. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648393 49.86382, -8.648393 60.86099, 1.767549 60.86099, 1.767549 49.86382, -8.648393 49.86382))"],"organisation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/8f37b8d7-92f1-41f1-a980-2b729cb5a222"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Modelled nitrogen and sulphur deposition grids for the UK for 2 vegetation types (2004-2014)","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Vegetation-specific 3-year average deposition data for nitrogen and sulphur from 2004. The data are based on a spatial resolution of 5x5km. All deposition values are the sum of wet, dry and cloud deposition and are expressed in kiloequivalents per hectare per year...."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying software implementation of the Polyscape framework. \nThe model was developed through work at Pontbren, exploring impacts of land-use on flooding. Landcover types providing mitigation from flash-flood risk and diffuse pollution through enhanced infiltration (e.g. woodlands and wetlands); these are mapped as providing a service. LUCI then simulates flow and nutrient accumulation over the landscape, with areas routing through these mitigating features mapped as “mitigated” i.e. not hydrologically connected to the stream. Hydrologically connected areas of the landscape with large accumulations of water or pollutants are mapped as having potential to benefit from changes inland cover or management which could provide mitigating services. Hydrological routing is also used to map annual flow and average loading and concentration of N and P at each point on the river network. For agricultural production and carbon, LUCI compares the services provided by the current utilisation of the landscape to estimates of its potential capability. For each service, the model then processes this data to identify areas where change might improve service provision, and where current service provision is good or lacks potential to improve. Trade-offs between outputs for the individual ecosystem services are modelled and mapped, with an option for the user to preferentially weight services of higher importance.\n","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services","Management outcome","Confidence levels"],"impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["Regional","Plot","National","Field","Farm","Catchment","catchment"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","River flow and networks","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","River flow and networks","Regional","Plot","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Management outcome","Land use","Land cover","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Geospatial / Map","Field","Farm","Confidence levels","Climate scenarios","Catchments and topography","Catchment","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Model (UKCEH)","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/adead10b-a6a0-45fa-b350-acd16b23c3fe"],"resourceType":"Model (UKCEH)","state":"published","title":"LUCI  (Land Utilisation & Capability Indicator)","version":1.0,"view":["public"],"shortenedDescription":"LUCI explores the capability of a landscape to provide a variety of ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, flood and diffuse pollutant mitigation, carbon sequestration, habitat provision etc. The model is a second generation extension and accompanying..."},{"publicationDate":"2012-04-01T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["FF-HadRM3-PPE"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["C.","S.","D.","J.","G.","L.","H.","T."],"authorFamilyName":["Prudhomme","Dadson","Morris","Williamson","Goodsell","Crooks","Boolee","Davies","Buys","Lafon"],"authorFullName":["Prudhomme, C.","Dadson, S.","Morris, D.","Williamson, J.","Goodsell, G.","Crooks, S.","Boolee, L.","Davies, H.","Buys, G.","Lafon, T."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-2497"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"Future Flows Climate (FF-HadRM3-PPE) is an eleven-member ensemble climate projection for Great Britain at a 1-km resolution spanning from 1950 to 2098. It was specifically developed for hydrological application and contain daily time series of Available Precipitation, which is the precipiated water available to hydrological processes after delays due to snow and ice storage are accounted for; and monthly reference Potential Evapotranspiration calculated using the FAO56 method. Future Flows Climate is derived from the Hadley Centre's Regional climate projection ensemble HadRM3-PPE based on 11 different variants of the regional climate model run under the SRES A1B emission scenario. HadRM3-PPE is underpinning the UKCP09 products. Bias correction and spatial downscaling were applied to the total precpitation and air temperature variables before Future Flows Climate APr and PE were generated. The development of Future Flows Climate was made during the partnership project 'Future Flows and Groundwater Levels' funded by the Environment Agency for England and Wales, Defra, UK Water Research Industry, NERC (Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and British Geological Survey) and Wallingford HydroSolutions.","documentType":"LINK_DOCUMENT","identifier":"1a6ed3fd-f161-4a3e-8ea4-ea7a045252cb","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map","Time Series"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Climate Scenarios"],"incomingCitationCount":6,"givenName":["C.","S.","D.","J.","G.","L.","H.","T."],"familyName":["Prudhomme","Dadson","Morris","Williamson","Goodsell","Crooks","Boolee","Davies","Buys","Lafon"],"fullName":["Prudhomme, C.","Dadson, S.","Morris, D.","Williamson, J.","Goodsell, G.","Crooks, S.","Boolee, L.","Davies, H.","Buys, G.","Lafon, T."],"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","Time Series","National","Climate Scenarios","Climate and climate change","Hydrology","climate","atmospheric precipitation","modelling","hydrology"],"keywordsTheme":["Climate and climate change","Hydrology"],"keywordsOther":["climate","atmospheric precipitation","modelling","hydrology"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"A modified version of the 11-member HadRM3-PPE ensemble projection assuming SRES-A1B emissions scenario developed for hydrological application in March 2012. It cover land areas of Great Britain at a 1-km resolution and contains 11 sets of 1951-2098 equally likely time series for two data types daily Available Precipitation (incorporating delays due to water storage as snow and ice) and monthly Potential Evapotranspiritation time series. Future Flows Climate used a monthly bias-correction and downscaling procedure based on the Gamma distribution (precipitation) and linear model (temperature). Potential Evapotranspiration is calculated using the FAO56 formulation with monthly bias-corrected downscaled temperature and HadRM3-PPE original time series for the other variables. As Future Flows Climate datasets are derived from climate model outputs they do not replicate the historical weather but are possible realisations of the climate. Despite the use of bias-correction and downscaling procedures Future Flows Climate might still contain some differences with observed climate and cannot be compared directly with gauged values. SC090016/PN2, SC090016/PN3 SC090016/PN5 project technical notes provide details on the methods used and results.","locations":["POLYGON((-10 50, -10 70, 5 70, 5 50, -10 50))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-2497"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1328785794937","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/bad1514f-119e-44a4-8e1e-442735bb9797","10.5285/bad1514f-119e-44a4-8e1e-442735bb9797"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Future flows climate data","topic":["0/Climate and climate change/","0/Hydrology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"Future Flows Climate (FF-HadRM3-PPE) is an eleven-member ensemble climate projection for Great Britain at a 1-km resolution spanning from 1950 to 2098. It was specifically developed for hydrological application and contain daily time series of Available Precipitation,..."},{"publicationDate":"2014-05-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","catalogue":"cmp","description":"Dataset of 1076 sediment monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including medium (river, marine and estuarine); purpose of the monitoring (Water Framework Directive [1], Controlled Activities Regulations [1] and Clean Seas Environmental Monitoring Programme); analytic function (including organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, metals chemistry, marine biology and invertebrates), and approximate annual frequency of the monitoring.\n\n[1] \"What Water regulations apply in Scotland?\" SEPA. http://www.sepa.org.uk/regulations/water/. Checked 04/10-2016\n\n\n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"fc49aa01-16b9-44da-8d14-92be06a93c66","impDataType":["Geospatial / Map"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Water Use"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Geospatial / Map","National","Site Specific Data","Water Quality","Water Use","Sediment"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Unknown","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"organisation":["Scottish Environment Protection Agency"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/fc49aa01-16b9-44da-8d14-92be06a93c66"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"SEPA Sediment Monitoring sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset of 1076 sediment monitoring sites in Scotland measured by SEPA for a variety of purposes. The dataset consists of site locations in British National Grid or Lat/Long WGS84, describing aspects of each site and the monitoring activity including medium (river,..."},{"catalogue":"cmp","description":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage and local output suitable for stakeholder engagement in study areas. Application of the tool can aid identification, targeting and prioritisation of land-use opportunities for management of water quality.","documentType":"IMP_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e534c7cc-d2fb-47e6-8ace-36ced5f9af48","impCaMMPIssues":["Transferability","Other Services"],"impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["Water quality","Soil","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biodiversity"],"impWaterPollutant":["Sediment","Phosphorus","Nitrogen","Biological quality"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Water quality","Transferability","Soil","Sediment","Phosphorus","Other Services","Nitrogen","National","Greenhouse gas fluxes","Biological quality","Biodiversity"],"recordType":"Case Study","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e534c7cc-d2fb-47e6-8ace-36ced5f9af48"],"resourceType":"Case Study","state":"published","title":"Case Study 7: Interpolation of model outputs and data from catchment to national scales and monitored to non-monitored sites","version":1.0,"view":["public","jaccos"],"shortenedDescription":"This case study uses a Dynamic Typology Tool (DTT) to combine spatially explicit datasets describing landscape character and management and identify homologous areas of agricultural potential, natural environment quality and risk.  The DTT provides national coverage..."},{"altTitle":["WFD waterbodies for Wales"],"catalogue":"cmp","description":"The Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires the preparation, implementation and review of River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) on a six-year cycle. River Basin Districts (RBD) and the WFD Waterbodies that they comprise are important spatial management units, regularly used in catchment management studies.\n\nRiver Basin Districts are the main areas for co-ordinating management of the water environment. They comprise river basins and their associated coastal waters. There are 3 River Basin Districts in Wales, , two of which, the Dee and Severn Districts, cross the border between Wales and England.\n\nRiver basins are made up of lakes, rivers, groundwaters, estuaries and coastal waters, together with the land they drain. The waters of Wales have been divided into water bodies. These are lakes and parts of rivers, estuaries, coastal waters and groundwater. They include artificial water bodies, such as canals, and heavily modified water bodies, such as deepened and straightened rivers. Environmental objectives are set for each water body.\n\nManagement catchments are the unit of geography for which action plans are drafted in implementing the WFD. Operational catchments are a way of grouping WFD waterbodies together for the purposes of economic appraisal.\n\nNatural Resources Wales publish datasets of RBDs and water bodies as spatial datasets as polylines (Rivers, Canals, Surface Water Transfers) or polygons (Lakes, Transitional waters, Coastal waters, Groundwaters, as well as catchments of the river waterbodies). Some cycle 1 datasets are not available due to licensing restrictions with the underlying datasets.\n\nDatasets available:\nCycle 1 (downloadable): coastal, lake, transitional;\nCycle 2 (all downloadable): RBD, river, river catchments, lake, transitional, coastal, operational catchments, acid sensitive waterbodies.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"3314483e-a8a5-4ef8-a35b-b71fa5fff661","impScale":["National"],"impTopic":["River Flow and Networks"],"incomingCitationCount":0,"keyword":["Hydrography","National","River Flow and Networks"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"There are differences between the cycle 1 and cycle 2 catchments.","locations":["POLYGON((-5.473 51.375, -5.473 53.434, -2.654 53.434, -2.654 51.375, -5.473 51.375))"],"organisation":["Natural Resources Wales"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/3314483e-a8a5-4ef8-a35b-b71fa5fff661"],"resourceStatus":"Unknown","resourceType":"Dataset","state":"published","title":"Water Framework Directive (WFD) water bodies for Wales","version":1.0,"view":["public","mfry"],"shortenedDescription":"The Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires the preparation, implementation and review of River Basin Management Plans (RBMP) on a six-year cycle. River Basin Districts (RBD) and the WFD Waterbodies that they comprise are important spatial management units, regularly..."}],"facets":[{"fieldName":"resourceType","displayName":"Resource type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Case Study","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=resourceType%7CCase+Study","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Dataset","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=resourceType%7CDataset","active":false,"count":122},{"name":"Model (UKCEH)","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=resourceType%7CModel+%28UKCEH%29","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impCaMMPIssues","displayName":"CaMMP Issues","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Climate Change","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CClimate+Change","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Confidence levels","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CConfidence+levels","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Cost Effectiveness","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CCost+Effectiveness","active":false,"count":3},{"name":"Management outcome","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CManagement+outcome","active":false,"count":12},{"name":"Other Services","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7COther+Services","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Pollution Source","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CPollution+Source","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Transferability","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impCaMMPIssues%7CTransferability","active":false,"count":13}]},{"fieldName":"impDataType","displayName":"Data Type","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Geospatial / Map","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impDataType%7CGeospatial+%2F+Map","active":false,"count":69},{"name":"Tabular","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impDataType%7CTabular","active":false,"count":42},{"name":"Time Series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impDataType%7CTime+Series","active":false,"count":37},{"name":"Time series","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impDataType%7CTime+series","active":false,"count":5}]},{"fieldName":"impScale","displayName":"Scale","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational","active":true,"count":47},{"name":"Farm","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CFarm","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Field","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CField","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"National","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","active":true,"count":93},{"name":"Plot","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CPlot","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Regional","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment","active":true,"count":6},{"name":"River Reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+Reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"River reach","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7CRiver+reach","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"catchment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7Ccatchment","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"national","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impScale%7Cnational","active":false,"count":3}]},{"fieldName":"impTopic","displayName":"Topic","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Administration Units","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CAdministration+Units","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Agricultural Practices","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CAgricultural+Practices","active":false,"count":13},{"name":"Air Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CAir+Quality","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Biodiversity","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CBiodiversity","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Catchments and Topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+Topography","active":false,"count":10},{"name":"Catchments and topography","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CCatchments+and+topography","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Climate Scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+Scenarios","active":false,"count":8},{"name":"Climate scenarios","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CClimate+scenarios","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Geology","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CGeology","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+Gas+Fluxes","active":false,"count":1},{"name":"Greenhouse gas fluxes","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CGreenhouse+gas+fluxes","active":false,"count":5},{"name":"Land Cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Cover","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Land Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+Use","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Land cover","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+cover","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Land use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CLand+use","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural Pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+Pollution","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Non-agricultural pollution","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CNon-agricultural+pollution","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"River Flow and Networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+Flow+and+Networks","active":false,"count":17},{"name":"River flow and networks","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CRiver+flow+and+networks","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Site Specific Data","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CSite+Specific+Data","active":false,"count":9},{"name":"Soil","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CSoil","active":false,"count":18},{"name":"Water Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Quality","active":false,"count":44},{"name":"Water Use","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+Use","active":false,"count":6},{"name":"Water quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CWater+quality","active":false,"count":16},{"name":"Weather","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impTopic%7CWeather","active":false,"count":11}]},{"fieldName":"impWaterPollutant","displayName":"Water Pollutant","hierarchical":false,"admin":false,"results":[{"name":"Biological Quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+Quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Biological quality","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CBiological+quality","active":false,"count":4},{"name":"Faecal Indicator Organisms","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CFaecal+Indicator+Organisms","active":false,"count":7},{"name":"Metaldehyde","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CMetaldehyde","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Nitrogen","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CNitrogen","active":false,"count":33},{"name":"Phosphorous","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorous","active":false,"count":2},{"name":"Phosphorus","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CPhosphorus","active":false,"count":30},{"name":"Sediment","url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/cmp/documents?facet=impScale%7CRegional&facet=impScale%7CNational&facet=impScale%7CCatchment&facet=impWaterPollutant%7CSediment","active":false,"count":17}]}],"order":"asc"}