{"numFound":75,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?facet=funder%7CNatural+Environment+Research+Council&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=funder%7CEnvironment+Agency&facet=recordType%7CDataset","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?page=2&facet=funder%7CNatural+Environment+Research+Council&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=funder%7CEnvironment+Agency&facet=recordType%7CDataset","results":[{"publicationDate":"2025-07-11T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service"],"authorGivenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"authorFamilyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"authorFullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at multiple locations. Trapping at each location typically involved 3-5 nights per trap line, but this could vary. The trap lines typically comprised 12 pairs of traps each set 10 metres apart along a transect line, with geographical coordinates for the centre of a pair of traps along the trap line. Animals were primarily captured for tissue collection for genetic analysis (not included in this dataset) to investigate the effectiveness of habitat corridors for promoting movement.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)"],"grant":["NE/T006935/1"],"identifier":"de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"familyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"fullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Animals were captured during standardized trapping surveys with Sherman traps, and Tomahawk traps in systematic arrays. Trapping targeted small-medium sized rodents, carnivores and opossums. Captured animals were identified to species, marked individually, biometrics were recorded (ear size, hind foot and tail length), and tissue samples were collected, generally from the ear. The animals were then released alive. Trap and capture data are linked via a primary key field.\nAt each trap check, data from captured animals were recorded in the field on data sheets, and then later computerized by entering into spreadsheets. Data were checked against original field records for quality assurance and validation.\n","locations":["POLYGON((33.559 -4.912, 33.559 5.269, 42.084 5.269, 42.084 -4.912, 33.559 -4.912))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Monitoring data from small mammal trapping in forest habitats in Kenya, 2021-2022","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","elsdhi"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-04-03T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh","Kathmandu University, Nepal","COMSATS University, Pakistan","Sherubtse College, Bhutan","The Nature Conservancy, India","University of Peradeniya","National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management, India","Dilmah Conservation"],"authorGivenName":["A.","C.","S.P.","S.","S.A.","D.","K.","B.","T.","F.","M.A.","M.R."],"authorFamilyName":["Deshpande","Ellis","Pradhan","Sharma","Asad","Tshering","Wangchuk","Chatterjee","Weerakoon","Nissanka","Ganguly","Prabhashwara","Duarte","Stephens","Iwanicka","Sutton","Jones"],"authorFullName":["Deshpande, A.","Ellis, C.","Pradhan, S.P.","Sharma, S.","Asad, S.A.","Tshering, D.","Wangchuk, K.","Chatterjee, S.","Weerakoon, B.","Nissanka, S.P.","Ganguly, D.","Prabhashwara, T.","Duarte, F.","Stephens, A.","Iwanicka, A.","Sutton, M.A.","Jones, M.R."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-1271"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/0349vqz63","https://ror.org/036xnae80","https://ror.org/031ggcd89","https://ror.org/025h79t26"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains field measurements of atmospheric ammonia under forest canopies in the Himalayas in India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan and in a tropical forest in Sri Lanka between 2022 and 2024. Monthly mean atmospheric ammonia concentrations are provided from 33 sites across the five countries. This dataset provides the first ever empirical measurements of ammonia from South Asian forests and can be used to estimate ecological impact, inform policy decisions, validate atmospheric chemistry transport models and satellite data and design future air quality and ecological monitoring in the region. The ammonia concentration data was collected monthly by deploying passive citric acid-coated samplers at the study locations.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/S009019/1"],"identifier":"9c4aee69-3693-4f18-97c8-ff740045f3de","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["A.","C.","S.P.","S.","S.A.","D.","K.","B.","T.","F.","M.A.","M.R.","A.G."],"familyName":["Deshpande","Ellis","Pradhan","Sharma","Asad","Tshering","Wangchuk","Chatterjee","Weerakoon","Nissanka","Ganguly","Prabhashwara","Duarte","Stephens","Iwanicka","Sutton","Jones"],"fullName":["Deshpande, A.","Ellis, C.","Pradhan, S.P.","Sharma, S.","Asad, S.A.","Tshering, D.","Wangchuk, K.","Chatterjee, S.","Weerakoon, B.","Nissanka, S.P.","Ganguly, D.","Prabhashwara, T.","Duarte, F.","Stephens, A.","Iwanicka, A.","Sutton, M.A.","Jones, M.R.","Deshpande, A.G."],"keyword":["South Asia","Environmental survey","ammonia","Himalaya","forest","passive sampling","air pollution","agriculture"],"keywordsPlace":["South Asia"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["ammonia","Himalaya","forest","passive sampling","air pollution","agriculture"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Starting May 2022, triplicate sets of UKCEH Adapted Low-cost Passive High Absorption (ALPHA®) samplers were deployed under the forest canopy at sites buffered by at least 500 m of continuous forest on all sides. The exposed samplers were replaced with fresh ones at the end of each month. The exposed samplers from India, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka were analysed at the National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management, Chennai and samplers from Pakistan were analysed at UKCEH, Edinburgh using the salicylate method. Blank samplers for each period were also analysed. The analysis provides the concentration of ammonium ions absorbed by each sampler. This is further converted to atmospheric ammonia concentration using an uptake rate which determined annually in the UK by co-locating the ALPHA samplers with UKCEH DEnuder for Long-Term Atmospheric sampling (DELTA®) samplers at multiple UK sites. The monthly concentration at each site is calculated as the average of the concentration measured by each sampler in the triplicate set. Obvious outliers are removed before calculating the average. Further quality assurance is performed based on comments from site operators regarding physical damage to the sampler, wet sampler, etc. ","locations":["POLYGON((66.269 3.864, 66.269 34.235, 93.873 34.235, 93.873 3.864, 66.269 3.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-1271"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh","Kathmandu University, Nepal","COMSATS University, Pakistan","Sherubtse College, Bhutan","The Nature Conservancy, India","University of Peradeniya","National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management, India","Dilmah Conservation","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/9c4aee69-3693-4f18-97c8-ff740045f3de","10.5285/9c4aee69-3693-4f18-97c8-ff740045f3de"],"resourceStatus":"Embargoed","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/0349vqz63","https://ror.org/036xnae80","https://ror.org/031ggcd89","https://ror.org/025h79t26","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Ammonia concentrations from high-elevation Himalayan forests and a Sri Lankan tropical forest, 2022-2024","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","tinzha"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains field measurements of atmospheric ammonia under forest canopies in the Himalayas in India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bhutan and in a tropical forest in Sri Lanka between 2022 and 2024. Monthly mean atmospheric ammonia concentrations are provided from..."},{"publicationDate":"2023-08-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects"],"authorGivenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B."],"authorFamilyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"authorFullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The parties involved in data collection are listed in the author section.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/W004216/1"],"identifier":"b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B.","Dylan"],"familyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"fullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Images were collected by Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth, and Diopsis camera systems. AMI systems captured images at 10 minute intervals and upon the detection of movement. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island during night time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. There are no missing data.","locations":["POLYGON((-79.869 9.135, -79.869 9.181, -79.817 9.181, -79.817 9.135, -79.869 9.135))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","10.5285/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":" Images of nocturnal insects collected in a trial of three automated camera systems on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, January 2023","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-10-06T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.A.","J.","C.","M.","N.","S.","B.A.","E.","R.A.","A.","P.A.","P.O.","A.M.","I.","D.W.","M.G.","R.J.","R.L.","P.","F.","S.M.","B.","C.M."],"authorFamilyName":["Robinson","Alison","Andrews","Brentegani","Chetiu","Dart","Emmett","Fitos","Garbutt","Gray","Henrys","Hunt","Keenan","Keith","Koblizek","Lebron","Millani Lopes Mazzetto","Pallett","Pereira","Pinder","Rose","Rowe","Scarlett","Seaton","Smart","Towill","Wagner","Williams","Wood"],"authorFullName":["Robinson, D.A.","Alison, J.","Andrews, C.","Brentegani, M.","Chetiu, N.","Dart, S.","Emmett, B.A.","Fitos, E.","Garbutt, R.A.","Gray, A.","Henrys, P.A.","Hunt, A.","Keenan, P.O.","Keith, A.M.","Koblizek, E.","Lebron, I.","Millani Lopes Mazzetto, J.","Pallett, D.W.","Pereira, M.G.","Pinder, A.","Rose, R.J.","Rowe, R.L.","Scarlett, P.","Seaton, F.","Smart, S.M.","Towill, J.","Wagner, M.","Williams, B.","Wood, C.M."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-6192","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-272X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-9786","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-0590","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-1482","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9619-1320","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-9717","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-0019","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-6272","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-5743","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-821X","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-8158","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-7451","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-7832","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-304X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil (0-15cm) physico-chemical properties from soils sampled from the first 100 1km squares across Great Britain in 2019 as part of a rolling soil and vegetation monitoring program of 500 1km squares repeated every 5 years. The properties included are: soil organic matter (loss on ignition (LOI)), derived carbon concentration, total soil organic carbon (SOC), nitrogen, Olsen-phosphorous, pH, electrical conductivity, soil bulk density of fine earth and fine earth volumetric water content. \n\nThe UKCEH Countryside Survey is a unique study or 'audit' of the natural resources of the UK's countryside. The sample sites are chosen from a stratified random sample, based on a 15 by 15 km grid of GB. Surveys have been carried out in 1978, 1984, 1990, 1998 and 2007 by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) and predecessors, with repeated visits to the majority of squares. The countryside is sampled and surveyed using rigorous scientific methods, allowing us to compare new results with those from previous surveys. In this way, we can detect the gradual and subtle changes that occur in the UK's countryside over time. In addition to soil data, vegetation species data are also gathered by the current phase of the Countryside Survey.\n\nThis work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council award number NE/R016429/1 as part of the UK-SCAPE programme delivering National Capability.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/R016429/1"],"identifier":"aaada12b-0af0-44ba-8ffc-5e07f410f435","incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["D.A.","J.","C.","M.","N.","S.","B.A.","E.","R.A.","A.","P.A.","P.O.","A.M.","I.","D.W.","M.G.","R.J.","R.L.","P.","F.","S.M.","B.","C.M."],"familyName":["Robinson","Alison","Andrews","Brentegani","Chetiu","Dart","Emmett","Fitos","Garbutt","Gray","Henrys","Hunt","Keenan","Keith","Koblizek","Lebron","Millani Lopes Mazzetto","Pallett","Pereira","Pinder","Rose","Rowe","Scarlett","Seaton","Smart","Towill","Wagner","Williams","Wood"],"fullName":["Robinson, D.A.","Alison, J.","Andrews, C.","Brentegani, M.","Chetiu, N.","Dart, S.","Emmett, B.A.","Fitos, E.","Garbutt, R.A.","Gray, A.","Henrys, P.A.","Hunt, A.","Keenan, P.O.","Keith, A.M.","Koblizek, E.","Lebron, I.","Millani Lopes Mazzetto, J.","Pallett, D.W.","Pereira, M.G.","Pinder, A.","Rose, R.J.","Rowe, R.L.","Scarlett, P.","Seaton, F.","Smart, S.M.","Towill, J.","Wagner, M.","Williams, B.","Wood, C.M."],"keyword":["Great Britain"," UK-SCAPE","Soil","Environmental survey","soil organic matter","soil pH","derived carbon concentration","fine earth volumetric water content","total soil organic carbon","soil nitrogen","Olsen-phosphorous","electrical conductivity","soil bulk density of fine earth","SOC"],"keywordsPlace":["Great Britain"],"keywordsProject":[" UK-SCAPE"],"keywordsTheme":["Soil","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["soil organic matter","soil pH","derived carbon concentration","fine earth volumetric water content","total soil organic carbon","soil nitrogen","Olsen-phosphorous","electrical conductivity","soil bulk density of fine earth","SOC"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Within each of 100 x 1km sample squares, a set of soil samples were taken from 5 pre-determined randomly dispersed locations (where practically possible). The soil sample analysed for soil metrics was taken using a black plastic core ('C-core'), 15cm long, from a location co-incident with vegetation surveys.\n\nAfter collection, the soil cores were refrigerated and stored until posted, usually within a couple of days, to laboratories at the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), Bangor and Lancaster. Analysed data were transferred to secure databases at UKCEH following sample analysis.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-6192","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-272X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-9786","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-0590","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-1482","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9619-1320","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-9717","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-0019","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-6272","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9993-5743","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-821X","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-8158","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-7451","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-7832","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-304X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/aaada12b-0af0-44ba-8ffc-5e07f410f435","10.5285/aaada12b-0af0-44ba-8ffc-5e07f410f435"],"resourceStatus":"Superseded","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Project website"],"supplementalName":["UKCEH Countryside Survey"],"title":"Topsoil physico-chemical properties from the UKCEH Countryside Survey, Great Britain, 2019","topic":["0/Soil/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil (0-15cm) physico-chemical properties from soils sampled from the first 100 1km squares across Great Britain in 2019 as part of a rolling soil and vegetation monitoring program of 500 1km squares repeated every 5 years. The..."},{"publicationDate":"2018-08-30T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","R.F."],"authorFamilyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"authorFullName":["Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive combination of B. terrestris and Lasioglossum spp. \n\nThe experimental design includes no pollinator controls nested within individual tomato plants exposed to the above pollinator species treatment combinations. This research was undertaken in 2017 and funded though a UKCEH Commercial Innovation Fund (National Capability) project supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (Project NEC06344).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Ben","B.A.","R.F."],"familyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"fullName":["Woodcock, B.","Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"keyword":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators","bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"keywordsTheme":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators"],"keywordsOther":["bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Three treatment combinations of bee pollinators foraging on tomatoes were compared: \n 1) B. terrestris alone (a single 30-40 worker colony);\n 2) Lasioglossum spp. alone, predominantly malachurum but with some pauxillum);\n 3) a combination of B. terrestris (a single 30-40 worker colony) and Lasioglossum spp.. \n\nAll experiments were undertaken under field conditions within three, 2 x 3 m net cages designed to hold free flying bees. B. terrestris colonies were obtained as commercially available stock (Biobest Ltd) but there is no equivalent for Lasioglossum spp.. To address this resident populations of L. malachurum and L. pauxillum were identified. These were found on bare and compacted soil oil of arable field corners. Over populations of Lasioglossum spp. two net cages were established, with a third in close proximity although not covering populations of the Lasioglossum spp.. Into this latter cage a B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was established. A further B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was allowed to forage in one of the cages covering Lasioglossum nests (Treatment 3), while the other was left without such a colony (Treatment 2). Population density of Lasioglossum in both cages was broadly equivalent, with c. 4.2 (± 0.8) nest borrows m-2. Treatment combinations were additive in terms of bee density reflecting likely practice under greenhouse growing conditions. Nets were only positioned over supporting cages on days when the experiment was being undertaken, to prevent starving of wild Lasioglossum populations. \n\nAs tomato plants produce no nectar it was necessary to cage a small quantity of Asteraceae garden plants to provide a nectar source for the bees. Experimental tomato plants (var. 'Moneymaker') were established under controlled greenhouse conditions where pollinators were excluded and were translocated to the experimental site when they had multiple flowering stems. Assessments were restricted to the first five mature flowers on each stem; subsequent flowers were removed. On each plant two flowering stems were selected, one was left open to pollination in the cages with treatments 1-3, the other was treated as a control and covered in a small net bag to prevent access by pollinators. Batches of five plants were placed in each of the three cages for a four-day period, with this repeated four times. After each period of exposure all plants were returned to greenhouse conditions and left to mature. When tomatoes had reached the same point of maturation (deep red colour) the number of fruits produced was counted (out of a maximum of five per stem) and the individual mass of each fruit was determined.","locations":["POLYGON((-1.196 51.632, -1.196 51.634, -1.195 51.634, -1.195 51.632, -1.196 51.632))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.","topic":["0/Agriculture/","0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental risk/","0/Pollinators/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","phtr"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive..."},{"publicationDate":"2019-02-27T00:00:00.000+00:00","altTitle":["Pesticide application maps for England and Wales, 2012-2016"],"authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["S.G.","P.A.","J.W.","B.M.","R.F."],"authorFamilyName":["Jarvis","Henrys","Redhead","Da Silva Osório","Pywell"],"authorFullName":["Jarvis, S.G.","Henrys, P.A.","Redhead, J.W.","Da Silva Osório, B.M.","Pywell, R.F."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-5135","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-1482","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-3848","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-4203","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This data product maps pesticide applications across England and Wales. It is produced at a 1km resolution with units of kg active ingredient applied per year. Pesticide application rates (kg/km2/yr) are calculated for each of the crops grown in each 1km square, with the total application calculated by multiplying the estimated rates by the area of each crop in the square. The product provides application estimates for 129 different active ingredients including herbicides, insecticides, molluscicides and fungicides. Uncertainty maps are produced alongside each active ingredient map to quantify the level of confidence in the estimated applications. Uncertainty is quantified using the distribution of each parameter estimate obtained from the modelling method and is expressed relative to the total application. The product is a snapshot of average applications between 2012 and 2016. The product builds upon the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) Land Cover® Plus: Crops product. An average of CEH Land Cover® Plus: Crops 2015, 2016 and 2017 is used to reflect average crop coverage at the 1km resolution. Temporal variation in pesticide application is not modelled explicitly but is reflected in the uncertainty maps.\n\nThis data product was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under research programme NE/N018125/1 Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems (ASSIST). ASSIST is an initiative jointly supported by NERC and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/N018125/1"],"identifier":"a72f8ce8-561f-4f3a-8866-5da620c0c9fe","incomingCitationCount":2,"givenName":["S.G.","P.A.","J.W.","B.M.","R.F."],"familyName":["Jarvis","Henrys","Redhead","Da Silva Osório","Pywell"],"fullName":["Jarvis, S.G.","Henrys, P.A.","Redhead, J.W.","Da Silva Osório, B.M.","Pywell, R.F."],"keyword":["England","Wales","ASSIST","Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems","Land use","Environmental risk","Mapping","Agriculture","pesticide application","2,4-D","2,4-DB","Alpha-cypermethrin","Amidosulfuron","Azoxystrobin","Bentazone","Benthiavalicarb-isopropyl","Beta-cyfluthrin","Bifenox","Bixafen","Boscalid","Bromoxynil","Carbendazim","Carboxin","Carfentrazone-ethyl","Chlorothalonil","Chlorotoluron","Chlorpyrifos","Clodinafop-propargyl","Clomazone","Clopyralid","Clothianidin","Cycloxydim","Cyflufenamid","Cymoxanil","Cypermethrin","Cyproconazole","Cyprodinil","Deltamethrin","Desmedipham","Dicamba","Difenoconazole","Diflufenican","Dimethenamid-P","Dimoxystrobin","Diquat","Epoxiconazole","Esfenvalerate","Ethofumesate","Famoxadone","Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl","Fenpropidin","Fenpropimorph","FerricPhosphate","Florasulam","Fluazifop-P-butyl","Fluazinam","Fludioxonil","Flufenacet","Fluopyram","Fluoxastrobin","Flupyrsulfuron-methyl","Fluquinconazole","Fluroxypyr","Flurtamone","Flusilazole","Flutriafol","Fluxapyroxad","Folpet","Fuberidazole","Glyphosate","Hymexazol","Imazalil","Imazamox","Imidacloprid","Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium","Ioxynil","Ipconazole","Isopyrazam","Kresoxim-methyl","Lambda-cyhalothrin","Lenacil","Linuron","Mancozeb","MCPA","MCPB","Mecoprop-P","Mesosulfuron-methyl","Mesotrione","Metalaxyl-M","Metaldehyde","Metamitron","Metazachlor","Metconazole","Methiocarb","Metrafenone","Metribuzin","Metsulfuron-methyl","Nicosulfuron","Pendimethalin","Penthiopyrad","Phenmedipham","Picloram","Picolinafen","Picoxystrobin","Pinoxaden","Pirimicarb","Prochloraz","Propaquizafop","Propiconazole","Propyzamide","Proquinazid","Prosulfocarb","Prothioconazole","Pymetrozine","Pyraclostrobin","Pyrimethanil","Quinmerac","Quizalofop-P-ethyl","Quizalofop-P-tefuryl","Rimsulfuron","Silthiofam","Spiroxamine","Tebuconazole","Tefluthrin","Terbuthylazine","Thiacloprid","Thiamethoxam","Thifensulfuron-methyl","Thiophanate-methyl","Thiram","Triadimenol","Tribenuron-methyl","Triclopyr","Trifloxystrobin","Triflusulfuron-methyl","Triticonazole","Zeta-cypermethrin","Zoxamide"],"keywordsPlace":["England","Wales"],"keywordsProject":["ASSIST","Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems"],"keywordsTheme":["Land use","Environmental risk","Mapping","Agriculture"],"keywordsOther":["pesticide application","2,4-D","2,4-DB","Alpha-cypermethrin","Amidosulfuron","Azoxystrobin","Bentazone","Benthiavalicarb-isopropyl","Beta-cyfluthrin","Bifenox","Bixafen","Boscalid","Bromoxynil","Carbendazim","Carboxin","Carfentrazone-ethyl","Chlorothalonil","Chlorotoluron","Chlorpyrifos","Clodinafop-propargyl","Clomazone","Clopyralid","Clothianidin","Cycloxydim","Cyflufenamid","Cymoxanil","Cypermethrin","Cyproconazole","Cyprodinil","Deltamethrin","Desmedipham","Dicamba","Difenoconazole","Diflufenican","Dimethenamid-P","Dimoxystrobin","Diquat","Epoxiconazole","Esfenvalerate","Ethofumesate","Famoxadone","Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl","Fenpropidin","Fenpropimorph","FerricPhosphate","Florasulam","Fluazifop-P-butyl","Fluazinam","Fludioxonil","Flufenacet","Fluopyram","Fluoxastrobin","Flupyrsulfuron-methyl","Fluquinconazole","Fluroxypyr","Flurtamone","Flusilazole","Flutriafol","Fluxapyroxad","Folpet","Fuberidazole","Glyphosate","Hymexazol","Imazalil","Imazamox","Imidacloprid","Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium","Ioxynil","Ipconazole","Isopyrazam","Kresoxim-methyl","Lambda-cyhalothrin","Lenacil","Linuron","Mancozeb","MCPA","MCPB","Mecoprop-P","Mesosulfuron-methyl","Mesotrione","Metalaxyl-M","Metaldehyde","Metamitron","Metazachlor","Metconazole","Methiocarb","Metrafenone","Metribuzin","Metsulfuron-methyl","Nicosulfuron","Pendimethalin","Penthiopyrad","Phenmedipham","Picloram","Picolinafen","Picoxystrobin","Pinoxaden","Pirimicarb","Prochloraz","Propaquizafop","Propiconazole","Propyzamide","Proquinazid","Prosulfocarb","Prothioconazole","Pymetrozine","Pyraclostrobin","Pyrimethanil","Quinmerac","Quizalofop-P-ethyl","Quizalofop-P-tefuryl","Rimsulfuron","Silthiofam","Spiroxamine","Tebuconazole","Tefluthrin","Terbuthylazine","Thiacloprid","Thiamethoxam","Thifensulfuron-methyl","Thiophanate-methyl","Thiram","Triadimenol","Tribenuron-methyl","Triclopyr","Trifloxystrobin","Triflusulfuron-methyl","Triticonazole","Zeta-cypermethrin","Zoxamide"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"These maps were created under the ASSIST (Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems) project by staff at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology to enable exploration of the impacts of agrochemical usage on the environment, enabling farmers and policymakers to implement better, more sustainable agricultural practices.\n\nThe maps use data from the Fera Pesticide Utilisation Surveys (PUS) and CEH Land Cover® plus: Crops and have been assessed for quality. For further information, please see the supporting documentation available with this data product.","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-5135","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4758-1482","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-3848","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-4203","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"organisation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/a72f8ce8-561f-4f3a-8866-5da620c0c9fe","10.5285/a72f8ce8-561f-4f3a-8866-5da620c0c9fe"],"resourceStatus":"Superseded","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalName":["ASSIST website"],"title":"CEH Land Cover plus: Pesticides 2012-2016 (England and Wales)","topic":["0/Land use/","0/Environmental risk/","0/Mapping/","0/Agriculture/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clamw"],"shortenedDescription":"This data product maps pesticide applications across England and Wales. It is produced at a 1km resolution with units of kg active ingredient applied per year. Pesticide application rates (kg/km2/yr) are calculated for each of the crops grown in each 1km square, with..."},{"publicationDate":"2021-02-26T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"authorFamilyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"authorFullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to grassy vegetation, deciduous trees and bacteria; no dose rate estimates for grassy vegetation have been made for those sites where grassy vegetation was absent.\n\nRadiation from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident killed coniferous trees in a 4-6 km2 area of forest to the west of the power plant. This area is now known as the 'Red Forest’ and it has subsequently regenerated with understorey vegetation and deciduous trees; it is the most anthropogenically contaminated radioactive ecosystem on Earth. In July 2016 a severe fire burnt (to varying degrees) c. 80 percent of the Red Forest; this presented a unique opportunity to study the impact of radiation on the recovery of forest ecosystems exposed to a secondary stressor (fire). To investigate this, in September 2017 the RED FIRE project set up sixty study plots in the Red Forest (in burnt and unburnt areas) with a further nine plots established close to Buriakivka village (approximately 8 km from the Red Forest).\n\nVegetation samples from each plot were harvested using shears in September 2017. Each sample was sorted into ‘grassy’ and ‘other’ vegetation; these were air-dried (20-25 degrees Celsius) and the grassy vegetation samples homogenised prior to radionuclide analyses.\n\nSoil core samples collected in September 2017 were bulked, homogenised and sub-samples taken for determination of pH and percentage moisture determined by oven drying (approximately 60 degrees Celsius) to a constant mass. The remaining soil sample was used for the determination of radionuclide activity concentrations; prior to analyses, these samples were dried at approximately 80 degrees Celsius.\n\nThis work was funded by the NERC, Grant Ref: NE/P015212/1 (RED FIRE: Radioactive Environment Damaged by fire: a Forest In Recovery)","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/P015212/1"],"identifier":"60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"familyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"fullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"keyword":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter","Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl","Radioecology","Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"keywordsInstrument":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter"],"keywordsPlace":["Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl"],"keywordsTheme":["Radioecology"],"keywordsOther":["Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Cs-137 activity concentrations were determined in grassy vegetation and soil using a high-purity germanium γ-detector (Model GC3019, Canberra-Packard, Connecticut, USA). A standard 137Cs/152Eu source (OISN-1; Applied Ecology Laboratory of Environmental Safety Centre, Odessa, Ukraine) was used for calibration. The minimal detectable activity was approximately 0.18 Bq per sample with uncertainties of approximately 10-15 percent (p=0.95) depending on the sample type. \n\nSr-90 activity concentrations were determined in soil and grassy vegetation samples using a β-spectrometer (EXPRESS-01) with a thin-filmed (0.1 mm) plastic scintillator detector. No radiochemical pre-treatment was required and samples were analysed as a solid matrix. Daily calibrations were conducted. Spectra were processed by correlating the sample spectra with those obtained from standard sources and those obtained from background measurements; uncertainties were approximately 20 percent (p=0.95).\nPrior to processing to determine activity concentrations of 241Am and Pu isotopes in soil samples, 242Pu and 243Am were added as yield tracers. Samples were dissolved in HF followed by treatment with HNO3, HCl, H3BO3+HNO3 and 8M HNO3. Plutonium and Am were separated using anion exchange resin (Bio Rad AG 1 × 8, 100-200 mesh). The Pu fraction was evaporated. Americium was precipitated with calcium oxalate and then separated using TRU resin columns; lanthanides were removed using an anion exchange resin column. Thin alpha sources of each separated actinide element were prepared by micro co-precipitation with neodymium fluoride and analysed using a Canberra Alpha Analyst alpha spectrometer. Counting errors were typically <20 percent.\n\nTo estimate the activity concentrations of Am-241 and Pu-isotopes for grassy vegetation transfer parameters (CRwo-soil) for Agrostis gigantea from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4) together with the appropriate measured soil activity concentration (DM). To estimate Sr-90 and Cs-137 activity concentrations in deciduous trees CRwo-soil values from sites within the CEZ were used (Holiaka et al. 2020) together with the measured soil activity concentrations (dry mass); for Am-241 and Pu-isotopes CRwo-soil values for Pinus sylvestris (wood) from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4).\n\nWeighted absorbed dose rate estimations for grassy vegetation and deciduous tree wood were made using the ERICA Tool http://www.erica-tool.com/ (version 1.3) and the revised ‘R&D128’ spreadsheet model (https://wiki.ceh.ac.uk/display/rpemain/Ar+-+Kr+-+Xe+dose+calculator) was used to estimate the weighted absorbed dose to bacteria. The ambient dose rate (µSv h-1) on the soil surface was measured at each study plot using a MKS-01R meter.","locations":["POLYGON((30.001 51.342, 30.001 51.415, 30.091 51.415, 30.091 51.342, 30.001 51.342))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","10.5285/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalName":["TREE website","REDFIRE website","CHAR webpage"],"title":"Soil and vegetation radionuclide activity concentrations and calculated dose rates from the Red Forest, Chernobyl, Ukraine, 2016-2017","topic":["0/Radioecology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","danor"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-03-27T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University"],"authorGivenName":["S.","W.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"authorFullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["S.","W.","A.","Stephen"],"familyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"fullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Samples & Validation of the array was carried out using a subset of 87 samples, which included four species of pine (Pinus sylvestris: SY; P. mugo: MU; P. uncinata: UN; P. uliginosa: UL). DNA was extracted from needles using a Qiagen DNeasy 96 kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Needles were dried on silica gel prior to extraction and DNA was quantified using a Qubit spectrophotometer to ensure a minimum standardized concentration of 35ng/µl. The quality of genomic DNA was also checked visually for fragmentation on 1% agarose gel.\n\n Genotyping was done at Edinburgh Genomics following DNA amplification, fragmentation, chip hybridisation, single-base extension through DNA ligation and signal amplification performed according to the Affymetrix Axiom® Assay protocol. Genotyping was performed in 384-well format on a GeneTitan according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Genotype calls were performed using Axiom Analysis Suite software as recommended by the manufacturer (ThermoFisher). Samples were assigned to an analysis group based on their call rate (CR) and dish QC (DQC: a metric provided by ThermoFisher which is generated by measuring signals at multiple sites in the genome known not to vary among individuals), using the following thresholds: DQC 'high' ≥ 0.82; DQC 'low' < 0.82; CR 'high' ≥ 96; CR 'low' < 96. Analyses: 1) DQC high + CR high; 2) DQC high + CR low; 3) DQC low + CR low. High quality samples (N=529), with high CR and DQC, were used to set thresholds for allele calls. Posteriors for allele calls were subsequently used as priors for analyses 2 (N = 753) and 3 (N = 251).","locations":["POLYGON((-18.359 37.192, -18.359 67.115, 24.839 67.115, 24.839 37.192, -18.359 37.192))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","10.5285/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Scots pine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for Axiom array validation","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex."},{"publicationDate":"2021-02-09T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["S.","V.","A.","L.A.","E.S.","J.R.","D.B.","M.","H.M.","N.","J.G.","P.","O.E.","W.D.","R.","G.V.","D.","P.M.","O.D.","J.L.","E.J.","A.C.","J.B."],"authorFamilyName":["Stanley","Antoniou","Askquith-Ellis","Ball","Bennett","Blake","Boorman","Brooks","Clarke","Cooper","Cowan","Cumming","Evans","Farrand","Fry","Hitt","Lord","Morrison","Nash","Rylett","Scarlett","Swain","Szczykulska","Thornton","Trill","Warwick","Winterbourn"],"authorFullName":["Stanley, S.","Antoniou, V.","Askquith-Ellis, A.","Ball, L.A.","Bennett, E.S.","Blake, J.R.","Boorman, D.B.","Brooks, M.","Clarke, M.","Cooper, H.M.","Cowan, N.","Cumming, A.","Evans, J.G.","Farrand, P.","Fry, M.","Hitt, O.E.","Lord, W.D.","Morrison, R.","Nash, G.V.","Rylett, D.","Scarlett, P.M.","Swain, O.D.","Szczykulska, M.","Thornton, J.L.","Trill, E.J.","Warwick, A.C.","Winterbourn, J.B."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-2969","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-4075","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0203-5958","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-9268","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-4712","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-5266","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-0393","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-3407","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-9006","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-1416","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-488X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-3127","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-2042","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-1153","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-7093","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-8942","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1318-5281"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains daily and sub-daily hydrometeorological and soil observations from COSMOS-UK (cosmic-ray soil moisture) monitoring network from October 2013 to the end of 2019. These data are from 51 sites across the UK recording a range of hydrometeorological and soil variables.\n\nEach site in the network records the following hydrometeorological and soil data at 30 minute resolution: Radiation (short wave, long wave and net), precipitation, atmospheric pressure, air temperature, wind speed and direction, humidity, soil heat flux, and soil temperature and volumetric water content (VWC), measured by point senors at various depths.\n\nEach site hosts a cosmic-ray sensing probe; a novel sensor technology which counts fast neutrons in the surrounding atmosphere. In combination with the recorded hydrometeorological data, neutron counts are used to derive VWC over a field scale (COSMOS VWC), at two temporal resolutions (hourly and daily).\nThe presence of snow leads to erroneously high measurements of COSMOS VWC due to all the extra water in the surrounding area. Included in the daily data are indications of snow days, on which, the COSMOS VWC are adjusted and the snow water equivalent (SWE) is given.\n\nThe potential evapotranspiration (PE), derived from recorded hydrometeorological and soil are also included at daily resolution.\n\nTwo levels of quality control are carried out, firstly data is run through a series of automated checks, such as range tests and spike tests, and then all data is manually inspected each week where any other faults are picked up, including sensor faults or connection issues. Quality control flags are provided for all recorded (30 minute) data, indicating the reason for any missing data.\n\nThis work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council award number NE/R016429/1 as part of the UK-SCAPE programme delivering National Capability.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/R016429/1"],"identifier":"b5c190e4-e35d-40ea-8fbe-598da03a1185","incomingCitationCount":9,"givenName":["S.","V.","A.","L.A.","E.S.","J.R.","D.B.","M.","H.M.","N.","J.G.","P.","O.E.","W.D.","R.","G.V.","D.","P.M.","O.D.","J.L.","E.J.","A.C.","J.B."],"familyName":["Stanley","Antoniou","Askquith-Ellis","Ball","Bennett","Blake","Boorman","Brooks","Clarke","Cooper","Cowan","Cumming","Evans","Farrand","Fry","Hitt","Lord","Morrison","Nash","Rylett","Scarlett","Swain","Szczykulska","Thornton","Trill","Warwick","Winterbourn"],"fullName":["COSMOS-UK Project Office","Stanley, S.","Antoniou, V.","Askquith-Ellis, A.","Ball, L.A.","Bennett, E.S.","Blake, J.R.","Boorman, D.B.","Brooks, M.","Clarke, M.","Cooper, H.M.","Cowan, N.","Cumming, A.","Evans, J.G.","Farrand, P.","Fry, M.","Hitt, O.E.","Lord, W.D.","Morrison, R.","Nash, G.V.","Rylett, D.","Scarlett, P.M.","Swain, O.D.","Szczykulska, M.","Thornton, J.L.","Trill, E.J.","Warwick, A.C.","Winterbourn, J.B."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Hydrology","Soil","absolute humidity","air temperature","atmospheric pressure","cosmic-ray sensing probe","net radiation","potential evapotranspiration","relative humidity","soil heat flux","soil temperature","UK","UK-SCAPE","COSMOS-UK","wind direction","wind speed","Incoming longwave radiation","Outgoing longwave radiation","soil depth 5cm","soil depth 10cm","soil depth 2cm","soil depth 50cm","soil depth 20cm","meteorological parameter","soil","wind","soil moisture","atmospheric humidity","atmospheric precipitation","evapotranspiration"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey","Hydrology","Soil"],"keywordsOther":["absolute humidity","air temperature","atmospheric pressure","cosmic-ray sensing probe","net radiation","potential evapotranspiration","relative humidity","soil heat flux","soil temperature","UK","UK-SCAPE","COSMOS-UK","wind direction","wind speed","Incoming longwave radiation","Outgoing longwave radiation","soil depth 5cm","soil depth 10cm","soil depth 2cm","soil depth 50cm","soil depth 20cm","meteorological parameter","soil","wind","soil moisture","atmospheric humidity","atmospheric precipitation","evapotranspiration"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Hydrometeorological and soil observations are recorded at sites around the UK using an array of sensors. Every hour, the raw data collected is sent to UKCEH in Wallingford, where it is subject to quality control. Soil volumetric water content data are derived from 30 minute hydrometeorological data and data from the cosmic-ray sensing probe by Python scripts run every hour. The data are calculated using the method outlined in Evans et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10929). Snow water equivalent are derived by Python scripts at the end of the day from the hydrometeorological data according to Wallbank et al. (2020, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019EGUGA..2116420W/abstract). Potential evapotranspiration data are derived by Python scripts at the end of the day from the hydrometeorological data according to the Penman-Monteith method (FAO 56, http://www.fao.org/3/X0490E/x0490e00.htm).\n\nAll data, that is raw, quality controlled and derived, is saved in an Oracle database.\n\nSee supporting documentation for further information.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-2969","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-4075","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0203-5958","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-9268","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-4712","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-5266","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-0393","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-3407","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-9006","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-1416","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1142-4039","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-488X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-3127","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-2042","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-1153","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-7093","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-8942","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1318-5281"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b5c190e4-e35d-40ea-8fbe-598da03a1185","10.5285/b5c190e4-e35d-40ea-8fbe-598da03a1185"],"resourceStatus":"Superseded","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Evans, J.G., Ward, H.C., Blake, J.R., Hewitt, E.J., Morrison, R., Fry, M., Ball, L. A., Doughty, L.C., Libre, J.W., Hitt, O.E., Rylett, D., Ellis, R.J., Warwick, A.C., Brooks, M., Parkes, M.A., Wright, G.M.H., Singer, A.C., Boorman, D.B., & Jenkins, A. (2016). Soil water content in southern England derived from a cosmic-ray soil moisture observing system - COSMOS-UK. In Hydrological Processes (Vol. 30, Issue 26, pp. 4987–4999). Wiley."],"supplementalName":["COSMOS-UK website"],"title":"Daily and sub-daily hydrometeorological and soil data (2013-2019) [COSMOS-UK]","topic":["0/Environmental survey/","0/Hydrology/","0/Soil/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","nuri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains daily and sub-daily hydrometeorological and soil observations from COSMOS-UK (cosmic-ray soil moisture) monitoring network from October 2013 to the end of 2019. These data are from 51 sites across the UK recording a range of hydrometeorological..."},{"publicationDate":"2024-07-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology"],"authorGivenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"authorFamilyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"authorFullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Nature Conservancy Council. A census of deciduous woodlands in Scotland was made (as marked on British Ordnance Survey (OS) maps, 7th Series 1:63,360), between 1976 and 1979. A desk-based map search was undertaken in the first instance, followed by field ground-truthing.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","Nature Conservancy Council"],"identifier":"7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"familyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"fullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The data were originally collected by members of staff at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, first as a desk-based exercise, and then during a field survey. A data rescue exercise was undertaken to re-digitise the data from the raw data sheets between 2019 and 2023. Quality checks were undertaken both at the time of the field collection, and later following data entry. Further detail is available in the supporting documentation.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","10.5285/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Extent and tree species composition from a Scottish deciduous woodland survey, 1976-1979","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","jashun"],"shortenedDescription":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-07-07T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["H","H. T.","B A","P O","K","G","S J"],"authorFamilyName":["Feuchtmayr","Carter","Dodd","Keenan","Le Quesne","McShane","Moorhouse","Rankin","Rhodes","Thackeray"],"authorFullName":["Feuchtmayr, H.","Carter, H.T.","Dodd, B.A.","Keenan, P.O.","Le Quesne, K.","McShane, G.","Moorhouse, H.","Rankin, G.","Rhodes, G.","Thackeray, S.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-4843"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This is part of an ongoing long-term monitoring dataset of surface temperature, surface oxygen, water clarity, water chemistry and phytoplankton chlorophyll a from fortnightly sampling at the South Basin of Windermere in Cumbria, England, that began in 1945 for some variables. The data have been collected by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH). The data available to download comprise surface temperature (TEMP) in degree Celsius, surface oxygen saturation (OXYG) in % air-saturation, Secchi depth (SECC) in metres, alkalinity (ALKA) in µg per litre as CaCO3 and pH. Total ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4N), total oxidised nitrogen (TON), soluble reactive phosphate (PO4P), total phosphorus (TOTP), dissolved reactive silicon expressed as SiO2 (SIO2) and phytoplankton chlorophyll a (TOCA) are all given in µg per litre. Water samples are based on a sample integrated from 0 to 7m. Water chemistry values below the detection limit, are indicated by a < sign in the column titled ‘sign(if