{"numFound":267,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=recordType%7CDataset","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?page=2&facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=recordType%7CDataset","results":[{"publicationDate":"2025-07-11T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service"],"authorGivenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"authorFamilyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"authorFullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at multiple locations. Trapping at each location typically involved 3-5 nights per trap line, but this could vary. The trap lines typically comprised 12 pairs of traps each set 10 metres apart along a transect line, with geographical coordinates for the centre of a pair of traps along the trap line. Animals were primarily captured for tissue collection for genetic analysis (not included in this dataset) to investigate the effectiveness of habitat corridors for promoting movement.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)"],"grant":["NE/T006935/1"],"identifier":"de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"familyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"fullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Animals were captured during standardized trapping surveys with Sherman traps, and Tomahawk traps in systematic arrays. Trapping targeted small-medium sized rodents, carnivores and opossums. Captured animals were identified to species, marked individually, biometrics were recorded (ear size, hind foot and tail length), and tissue samples were collected, generally from the ear. The animals were then released alive. Trap and capture data are linked via a primary key field.\nAt each trap check, data from captured animals were recorded in the field on data sheets, and then later computerized by entering into spreadsheets. Data were checked against original field records for quality assurance and validation.\n","locations":["POLYGON((33.559 -4.912, 33.559 5.269, 42.084 5.269, 42.084 -4.912, 33.559 -4.912))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Monitoring data from small mammal trapping in forest habitats in Kenya, 2021-2022","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","elsdhi"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-07-06T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","B.","P.M.","E.","D.","S.A.","Z.","S.","A.J.","J.","D.A.","A.","C.M.","C."],"authorFamilyName":["Emmett","Reynolds","Chamberlain","Rowe","Spurgeon","Brittain","Frogbrook","Hughes","Lawlor","Poskitt","Potter","Robinson","Scott","Wood","Woods"],"authorFullName":["Emmett, B.A.","Reynolds, B.","Chamberlain, P.M.","Rowe, E.","Spurgeon, D.","Brittain, S.A.","Frogbrook, Z.","Hughes, S.","Lawlor, A.J.","Poskitt, J.","Potter, E.","Robinson, D.A.","Scott, A.","Wood, C.M.","Woods, C."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-8760","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (Mineral-N) from soils sampled from up to 256 1km squares across Great Britain in 2007. The Countryside Survey is a unique study or 'audit' of the natural resources of the UK's countryside. The sample sites are chosen from a stratified random sample, based on a 15 by 15 km grid of GB. Surveys have been carried out in 1978, 1984, 1990, 1998 and 2007 by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, with repeated visits to the majority of squares. The countryside is sampled and surveyed using rigorous scientific methods, allowing us to compare new results with those from previous surveys. In this way we can detect the gradual and subtle changes that occur in the UK's countryside over time. In addition to soil data, habitat areas, vegetation species data, linear habitat data, and freshwater habitat data are also gathered by Countryside Survey.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Bridget","B.A.","B.","P.M.","E.","D.","S.A.","Z.","S.","A.J.","J.","D.A.","A.","C.M.","C."],"familyName":["Emmett","Reynolds","Chamberlain","Rowe","Spurgeon","Brittain","Frogbrook","Hughes","Lawlor","Poskitt","Potter","Robinson","Scott","Wood","Woods"],"fullName":["Emmett, B.","Emmett, B.A.","Reynolds, B.","Chamberlain, P.M.","Rowe, E.","Spurgeon, D.","Brittain, S.A.","Frogbrook, Z.","Hughes, S.","Lawlor, A.J.","Poskitt, J.","Potter, E.","Robinson, D.A.","Scott, A.","Wood, C.M.","Woods, C."],"keyword":["Soil","Environmental survey","mineral-N","mineralisable nitrogen","topsoil"],"keywordsTheme":["Soil","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["mineral-N","mineralisable nitrogen","topsoil"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Soil samples were collected in the summer of 2007 by professional field surveyors. Soils were sampled from up to 591 1km squares sited across Britain, selected by random stratified sample. A sub-sample from up to 256 1km squares were analysed for mineral-N according to standardised protocols at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in 2007. Data are managed by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-8760","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759","10.5285/3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (mineral-N) data 2007 [Countryside Survey]","topic":["0/Soil/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clamw"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (Mineral-N) from soils sampled from up to 256 1km squares across Great Britain in 2007. The Countryside Survey is a unique study or 'audit' of the natural resources of the UK's countryside. The sample..."},{"publicationDate":"2021-04-29T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Glasgow","Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre"],"authorGivenName":["H.","S.","J.","M.H."],"authorFamilyName":["Ding","Waldron","Newton","Garnett"],"authorFullName":["Ding, H.","Waldron, S.","Newton, J.","Garnett, M.H."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-9445","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-0761","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-3693","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-2126"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains measurements of CO2 efflux from streams, springs, reservoirs and ponds in the Houzhai catchment, a typical karst catchment in the karst region of SW China. \n\nData were obtained via direct, field-based measurements during monthly campaigns conducted between January 2016 and February 2017. Also included are water chemistry parameters (water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, electronic conductivity, concentration of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic carbon (δ13C-DIC)) and flow velocity (determined prior to in-situ flux measurements).\n\nThe data were collected under the NERC-funded project: Addressing a significant knowledge gap in fluvial system atmospheric CO2 efflux: the contribution from karst landscapes (NE/N002806/1).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/N002806/1"],"identifier":"22706f2d-2070-425f-b570-d73089359b35","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["H.","S.","J.","M.H.","Hu"],"familyName":["Ding","Waldron","Newton","Garnett"],"fullName":["Ding, H.","Waldron, S.","Newton, J.","Garnett, M.H."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","water-atmosphere","karst","hydraulics","CO2 efflux"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["water-atmosphere","karst","hydraulics","CO2 efflux"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"All data were generated by the authors. The flux rate was measured over four minutes, repeated three times to obtain a mean rate of increase.For data generated via mass spectrometry, beam areas of all measured mass-to-charge ratios were corrected for drift offline using control standards. All calculations were checked for errors before data was accepted.","locations":["POLYGON((105.4 26.1, 105.4 26.15, 105.5 26.15, 105.5 26.1, 105.4 26.1))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-9445","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-0761","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-3693","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-2126"],"organisation":["University of Glasgow","Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/22706f2d-2070-425f-b570-d73089359b35","10.5285/22706f2d-2070-425f-b570-d73089359b35"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["University of Glasgow"],"ror":["https://ror.org/04xw4m193","https://ror.org/00vtgdb53"],"state":"published","title":"Fluvial hydrochemistry, CO2 efflux and delta 13C-Dissolved inorganic carbon data for the Houzhai Catchment, Southwest China, 2016-2018","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains measurements of CO2 efflux from streams, springs, reservoirs and ponds in the Houzhai catchment, a typical karst catchment in the karst region of SW China. \n\nData were obtained via direct, field-based measurements during monthly campaigns conducted..."},{"publicationDate":"2023-08-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects"],"authorGivenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B."],"authorFamilyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"authorFullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The parties involved in data collection are listed in the author section.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/W004216/1"],"identifier":"b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B.","Dylan"],"familyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"fullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Images were collected by Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth, and Diopsis camera systems. AMI systems captured images at 10 minute intervals and upon the detection of movement. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island during night time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. There are no missing data.","locations":["POLYGON((-79.869 9.135, -79.869 9.181, -79.817 9.181, -79.817 9.135, -79.869 9.135))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","10.5285/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":" Images of nocturnal insects collected in a trial of three automated camera systems on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, January 2023","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The..."},{"publicationDate":"2024-07-16T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Manchester","Moors for the Future Partnership"],"authorGivenName":["T.","T.E.H.","D.","M.","A.R.","J.L.","E.L.","M.G."],"authorFamilyName":["Howson","Allott","Edokpa","Kay","Johnston","Rees","Shuttleworth","Spencer","Evans"],"authorFullName":["Howson, T.","Allott, T.E.H.","Edokpa, D.","Kay, M.","Johnston, A.R.","Rees, J.L.","Shuttleworth, E.L.","Spencer, T.","Evans, M.G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-316X","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-9537","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-2620","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6788-0407","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-1366","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-1033"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/027m9bs27"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains the location, dimension, and ecological characteristics of 492 gully blocks on Kinder Scout, an upland peatland in the UK. Stone and timber dams were installed in 2013-2014 as part of peatland restoration works on Kinder Scout. The survey was undertaken to determine the longer-term (7-8 years) evolution of gully blocks. Location data for dam points was collected using a differential GPS (dGPS). Field measurements of dam dimensions and vegetation were carried out. Some dam characteristics were derived using geospatial methods. Ancillary vegetation data are provided in a separate file to the main dam survey data and can be matched on the dam identification number. ","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"6ab9c89d-7ba1-4bc8-afc6-c2563f4ff49b","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.","T.E.H.","D.","M.","A.R.","J.L.","E.L.","M.G."],"familyName":["Howson","Allott","Edokpa","Kay","Johnston","Rees","Shuttleworth","Spencer","Evans"],"fullName":["Howson, T.","Allott, T.E.H.","Edokpa, D.","Kay, M.","Johnston, A.R.","Rees, J.L.","Shuttleworth, E.L.","Spencer, T.","Evans, M.G."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","gully block","NFM","restoration","peatland","peat"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["gully block","NFM","restoration","peatland","peat"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Dam location was surveyed using a Leica VIVA GS10 GNSS with a rover and base station. Rover and base station data were post-processed in the Leica Infinity software, using Ordnance Survey RINEX data from the Buxton station as the fixed reference point to correct the base station position. Fixed control points were repeat surveyed during each day of surveying and used to determine the 3D quality of surveying. A 3D error of 0.03m was calculated from the repeat survey points. \nDam dimensions, including depths and heights, were measured in the field with a meter rule and level.\n","locations":["POLYGON((-1.896 53.398, -1.896 53.407, -1.851 53.407, -1.851 53.398, -1.896 53.398))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-316X","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-9537","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-2620","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6788-0407","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-1366","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-1033"],"organisation":["University of Manchester","Moors for the Future Partnership","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/6ab9c89d-7ba1-4bc8-afc6-c2563f4ff49b","10.5285/6ab9c89d-7ba1-4bc8-afc6-c2563f4ff49b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/027m9bs27","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Physical and ecological characteristics of peatland gully blocks on Kinder Scout, Peak District, UK, 2021","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","simgil"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains the location, dimension, and ecological characteristics of 492 gully blocks on Kinder Scout, an upland peatland in the UK. Stone and timber dams were installed in 2013-2014 as part of peatland restoration works on Kinder Scout. The survey was undertaken..."},{"publicationDate":"2024-10-16T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen","Archaeology Institute, University of Highlands and Islands","School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast"],"authorGivenName":["A.M.","J.E.","T.","S.","G."],"authorFamilyName":["Everard","Schofield","Mighall","Timpany","Plunkett"],"authorFullName":["Everard, A.M.","Schofield, J.E.","Mighall, T.","Timpany, S.","Plunkett, G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-2007","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1379-0753","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-7694","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-023X","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1014-3454"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/02s08xt61","https://ror.org/00hswnk62"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains information about multiple palaeoecological proxies – pollen, non-pollen palynomorphs, spores, microcharcoal, plant macrofossils and macrocharcoal – generated from stand-scale (forest hollow-based) analyses of Cambusurich Wood Site of Special Scientific Interest, Scotland (Ordnance Survey grid reference: NN 62741 34679). The site’s chronology and loss-on-ignition (LOI) analyses are also provided. ","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/S007377/1"],"identifier":"60952512-b682-4bd6-a609-365f64944fda","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["A.M.","J.E.","T.","S.","G."],"familyName":["Everard","Schofield","Mighall","Timpany","Plunkett"],"fullName":["Everard, A.M.","Schofield, J.E.","Mighall, T.","Timpany, S.","Plunkett, G."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","palaeoecology","paleoecology","stand-scale","woodland and forest","pollen","plant microfossils","non-pollen palynomorphs"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["palaeoecology","paleoecology","stand-scale","woodland and forest","pollen","plant microfossils","non-pollen palynomorphs"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"This data was generated as part of a study of the long-term dynamics in ancient temperate woodland of high conservation value. The palaeoecological proxies were analysed from two sets of duplicate parallel peat cores extracted from a closed-canopy forest hollow using a large Russian corer until the base of the peat sequence. Macrofossil analyses was performed on one set of cores and the other proxies were analysed on the second set. \nPollen analyses was performed at 2 cm intervals using standard techniques (as described in Moore et al., 1991) with dense-media separation following Nakagawa et al. (1998). Pollen nomenclature follows Bennett (1995-2007) with Corylus-type used to refer to indistinguishable grains of Corylus avellana and Myrica gale. Non-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs) and microcharcoal was identified and counted on pollen slides. NPP nomenclature follows Miola (2012). \nMacrofossil analyses was performed on 2 cm thick contiguous samples following the method described in Field et al. (2000) and samples were disaggregated prior to sieving by heating for 45 minutes in 8 % NaOH. Macrofossils were recorded as absolute values with undifferentiated remains recorded on a 4-point scale of rare (< 10 individuals), occasional (10-50 individuals), frequent (50-100 individuals), or abundant (> 100). \nLoss-on-ignition (LOI) methodology followed Heiri et al. (2001) at 2 cm sample intervals and sediment stratigraphy was described using the Troels Smith (1955) system.\nSite chronological controls includes eight Accelerator Mass Spectrometry radiocarbon dates and the base of a 210Pb curve. \nCoauthors have verified the data and it has been split into five comma separated .csv files which can be used for single or multi-proxy analyses. These csv files contain: (1) raw microfossil count data, (2) raw macrofossil data, (3) site chronological controls, (4) loss-on-ignition and (6) sediment stratigraphy. \n","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-2007","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1379-0753","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-7694","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-023X","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1014-3454"],"organisation":["School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen","Archaeology Institute, University of Highlands and Islands","School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast","University of Aberdeen","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/60952512-b682-4bd6-a609-365f64944fda","10.5285/60952512-b682-4bd6-a609-365f64944fda"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["University of Aberdeen"],"ror":["https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/02s08xt61","https://ror.org/00hswnk62","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Stand-scale multiproxy palaeoecological data from Cambusurich Wood, Scotland","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","simgil"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains information about multiple palaeoecological proxies – pollen, non-pollen palynomorphs, spores, microcharcoal, plant macrofossils and macrocharcoal – generated from stand-scale (forest hollow-based) analyses of Cambusurich Wood Site of Special Scientific..."},{"publicationDate":"2019-11-19T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Nord University","University of Cambridge","SMART Research Institute"],"authorGivenName":["A. E.","E.C.","S. H.","A. D."],"authorFamilyName":["Eycott","Turner","Luke","Advento"],"authorFullName":["Eycott, A.E.","Turner, E.C.","Luke, S.H.","Advento, A.D."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-1091","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-2234","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-5960"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/030mwrt98","https://ror.org/013meh722"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data comprise sunflower seed predation rates (i.e. number of seeds remaining) after 24 hours under different treatments in eighteen experimental plots plots established in 2013 as part of the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) programme. Eighteen plots were examined across three estates - plots in Ujung Tanjung and Kandista estates were planted in 1987 to 1992 and are mature or over-mature oil palm, while Libo plots were replanted in 2014. Plots were organised in triplets and in Ujung Tanjung and Kandista, for each triplet one plot was assigned to each of three vegetation treatments: Reduced vegetation cover, normal vegetation management and enhanced vegetation cover.\n\nThe project 'Managing tropical agricultural ecosystems for resistance and recovery of ecosystem processes' was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council under NE/P00458X/1.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/P00458X/1"],"identifier":"1256d475-f321-4a9b-b4ed-927e5b825d3f","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Edgar","A. E.","E.C.","S. H.","A. D."],"familyName":["Turner","Eycott","Luke","Advento"],"fullName":["Turner, E.","Eycott, A.E.","Turner, E.C.","Luke, S.H.","Advento, A.D."],"keyword":["Indonesia","Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) ","Environmental survey","oil palm"],"keywordsPlace":["Indonesia"],"keywordsProject":["Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) "],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["oil palm"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Granivory was measured once in mature oil palm in 2014 and five times in both mature and replanted stands during 2016-2017. The basic unit for the granivory test was ten shelled sunflower seeds placed on a paper disc of approx. 15 cm diameter, covered by a polystyrene disposable plate held approx. 10cm above the soil surface with kebab sticks in order to keep the rain off. For each replicate four treatments were applied: two of the paper discs had 1cm of thick chassis grease applied round the edge and two were in cages such that there were cage + grease, cage only, grease only, and open. The traps were metal grid boxes approximately 35 x 20 x 14 cm, with no holes wider than 1cm. One test (four treatments) was carried out at each of the three sampling positions in the plot. Samples were placed out in the field for approximately 24 hours before being assessed. \nBasic data checks were carried out (checks for impossible values, such as 11 of 10 seeds remaining). We have error-checked 50% of the data entry against the original field sheets, finding an acceptable error rate of <1% and correcting errors when we encountered them. All changes were recorded and that information remains with the dataset. \nSee Luke et al. (2019, doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2019.00075) for further details of the experimental set-up.","locations":["POLYGON((100.003 0.516, 100.003 1.812, 101.662 1.812, 101.662 0.516, 100.003 0.516))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-1091","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-2234","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-5960"],"organisation":["University of Cambridge","Nord University","SMART Research Institute","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/1256d475-f321-4a9b-b4ed-927e5b825d3f","10.5285/1256d475-f321-4a9b-b4ed-927e5b825d3f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/013meh722","https://ror.org/030mwrt98","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["Luke, S. H., Advento, A. D., Aryawan, A. A. K., Adhy, D. N., Ashton-Butt, A., Barclay, H., … Turner, E. C. (2020). Managing Oil Palm Plantations More Sustainably: Large-Scale Experiments Within the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) Programme. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2.","Eycott, A.E., Advento, A.D., Waters, H.S., Luke, S.H., Aryawan, A.A.K., Hood, A.S., … Turner, E.C. (2019). Resilience of ecological functions to drought in an oil palm agroecosystem. Environmental Research Communications, 1(10), 101004."],"supplementalName":["BEFTA website"],"title":"Sunflower seed predation rates in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) plots, Kandista and Ujun Tanjung estates, Indonesia","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","jgar"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise sunflower seed predation rates (i.e. number of seeds remaining) after 24 hours under different treatments in eighteen experimental plots plots established in 2013 as part of the Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in Tropical Agriculture (BEFTA) programme...."},{"publicationDate":"2020-06-26T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Liverpool","University of Cambridge","Institute of Zoology"],"authorGivenName":["Andy","D. R.","A.","T. W. J."],"authorFamilyName":["Fenton","Daversa","Manica","Garner"],"authorFullName":["Fenton, A.","Daversa, D.R.","Manica, A.","Garner, T.W.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-917X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-8897","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1895-450X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-9706"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/04xs57h96","https://ror.org/013meh722"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains values on the prevalence and mean intensity of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection and ranavirus (Rv) infections in different combinations of common frog (Rana temporaria) and common toad (Bufo bufo) during mesocosm experiments executed in the summer of 2018, at the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"b33aff78-63d6-46a2-9353-93f45293a383","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Andy","D. R.","A.","T. W. J.","Fenton"],"familyName":["Fenton","Daversa","Manica","Garner","Andy"],"fullName":["Fenton, A.","Daversa, D.R.","Manica, A.","Garner, T.W.J.","Andy, F."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Rana temporaria","Bufo bufo","Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis","ranavirus","Mesocosm","Common toad","Common frog"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Rana temporaria","Bufo bufo","Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis","ranavirus","Mesocosm","Common toad","Common frog"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Experimental communities were composed of toad tadpoles, common frog tadpoles, or a 50/50 mixed species community and assigned one of four exposure regimes, which were broken into 2 phases according to pathogen type. \n\n(i) Control: Phase 1 - 6 x sham exposure to sterile media, sham 2 – 1 x sham exposure\n(ii) Bd only: Phase 1 - 6 x 150,000 Bd zoospores, phase 2 – single sham exposure\n(iii) Rv only: Phase 1 - 6 x sham exposure, phase 2 – single Rv exposure\n(iv) Co-infection: 6 x 150,000 Bd zoospores, phase 2 – single Rv exposure\n\nFor phase one, Bd zoospores in media or the same volume of sterile media (control) were introduced into the tanks. Phase 2 control tanks received three Rv-negative corpses. For phase three, Rv-positive larval common frog corpses were introduced into treatment tanks.","orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-917X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-8897","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1895-450X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-9706"],"organisation":["University of Liverpool","University of Cambridge","Institute of Zoology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b33aff78-63d6-46a2-9353-93f45293a383","10.5285/b33aff78-63d6-46a2-9353-93f45293a383"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Non-geographic dataset","rightsHolder":["University of Liverpool","Institute of Zoology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/04xs57h96","https://ror.org/013meh722","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Chytrid fungus and ranavirus coinfection data in multi-host mesocosm communities","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains values on the prevalence and mean intensity of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) infection and ranavirus (Rv) infections in different combinations of common frog (Rana temporaria) and common toad (Bufo bufo) during mesocosm experiments executed..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-03-27T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University"],"authorGivenName":["S.","W.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"authorFullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["S.","W.","A.","Stephen"],"familyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"fullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Samples & Validation of the array was carried out using a subset of 87 samples, which included four species of pine (Pinus sylvestris: SY; P. mugo: MU; P. uncinata: UN; P. uliginosa: UL). DNA was extracted from needles using a Qiagen DNeasy 96 kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Needles were dried on silica gel prior to extraction and DNA was quantified using a Qubit spectrophotometer to ensure a minimum standardized concentration of 35ng/µl. The quality of genomic DNA was also checked visually for fragmentation on 1% agarose gel.\n\n Genotyping was done at Edinburgh Genomics following DNA amplification, fragmentation, chip hybridisation, single-base extension through DNA ligation and signal amplification performed according to the Affymetrix Axiom® Assay protocol. Genotyping was performed in 384-well format on a GeneTitan according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Genotype calls were performed using Axiom Analysis Suite software as recommended by the manufacturer (ThermoFisher). Samples were assigned to an analysis group based on their call rate (CR) and dish QC (DQC: a metric provided by ThermoFisher which is generated by measuring signals at multiple sites in the genome known not to vary among individuals), using the following thresholds: DQC 'high' ≥ 0.82; DQC 'low' < 0.82; CR 'high' ≥ 96; CR 'low' < 96. Analyses: 1) DQC high + CR high; 2) DQC high + CR low; 3) DQC low + CR low. High quality samples (N=529), with high CR and DQC, were used to set thresholds for allele calls. Posteriors for allele calls were subsequently used as priors for analyses 2 (N = 753) and 3 (N = 251).","locations":["POLYGON((-18.359 37.192, -18.359 67.115, 24.839 67.115, 24.839 37.192, -18.359 37.192))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","10.5285/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Scots pine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for Axiom array validation","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex."},{"publicationDate":"2020-05-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Reading/UKCEH","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.","H.J.","O.L.","J.T"],"authorFamilyName":["Stanbury","Dean","Pescott","Staley"],"authorFullName":["Stanbury, D.","Dean, H.J.","Pescott, O.L.","Staley, J.T."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-7202","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-8046","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-3712"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains plant community data from a hedgerow experiment investigating the effects of cutting regimes on plant species richness. There were four sites, one in Buckinghamshire, two in Oxfordshire and one in Devon. Data were collected in 2016, using 1m x 10m quadrats on each side of the hedgerow at two positions. One quadrat was situated beneath the woody vegetation of the hedge (inner) and one adjacent to the inner quadrat (outer) to sample plant communities growing beside the hedge. Percentage vegetation cover was surveyed up to a height of 80cm.\n\nThe hedgerow experiment was one of three long running hedgerow experiments focusing on management to maintain and restore the hedgerow resource under agri-environment schemes. These long running experiments were funded by Defra and managed by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["D.","H.J.","O.L.","J.T","Joanna"],"familyName":["Stanbury","Dean","Pescott","Staley"],"fullName":["Stanbury, D.","Dean, H.J.","Pescott, O.L.","Staley, J.T.","Staley, J."],"keyword":["Oxfordshire","Buckinghamshire","Devon","Environmental survey","Biodiversity","hedgerow","plant species richness","biodiversity","plant species"],"keywordsPlace":["Oxfordshire","Buckinghamshire","Devon"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey","Biodiversity"],"keywordsOther":["hedgerow","plant species richness","biodiversity","plant species"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Data were digitised into Excel after field collection and then imported into an Oracle database that contained all the data from the long running hedgerow experiments. The data provided here have been exported from the Oracle database. The following measures were taken to ensure quality and accuracy: a standard protocol was used, species data were collected by experienced and appropriately qualified field surveyors, species lists were checked by an expert, and data were checked for anomalous values both prior to and post import into the Oracle database.\n","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-7202","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-8046","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-3712"],"organisation":["University of Reading/UKCEH","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f","10.5285/cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["J.T. Staley, N.P. Adams, S.R. Amy, M.S. Botham, L. Hulmes, S. Hulmes, H.J. Dean, M. McCracken, N. Mitschunas, R.E. Chapman, J.M. Peyton, J. Savage, L.E. Ridding, K.S. Baldock and R.F. Pywell (2018). Effects of hedgerow management and restoration on biodiversity. Defra research project BD2114. "],"supplementalName":["Effects of hedgerow management and restoration on biodiversity"],"title":"Plant community basal data from a hedgerow cutting experiment in England, 2016","topic":["0/Environmental survey/","0/Biodiversity/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains plant community data from a hedgerow experiment investigating the effects of cutting regimes on plant species richness. There were four sites, one in Buckinghamshire, two in Oxfordshire and one in Devon. Data were collected in 2016, using 1m x..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-04-22T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Leeds","University of Edinburgh","Rosalind Franklin Institute","UKCEH"],"authorGivenName":["C.S.","N.G.A.","C.L.","E.","R.L.","S.F.P.","J.G.","D.J."],"authorFamilyName":["Moody","Bell","Mackay","Kitson","Gasior","Hunt","Greenwood","Ashley"],"authorFullName":["Moody, C.S.","Bell, N.G.A.","Mackay, C.L.","Kitson, E.","Gasior, R.L.","Hunt, S.F.P.","Greenwood, J.G.","Ashley, D.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-7416"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains water chemistry and organic matter composition variables. Water chemistry variables include pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients, anions, cations and metal concentrations. Organic matter composition variables include metrics calculated from carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen concentrations. \nWater samples were collected from UK surface waters between 2018 and 2021. \nWater was collected from each site either annually, seasonally or monthly, to determine how organic matter varies over time and space. Site metadata include land use and vegetation cover, catchment area and percentage peat cover. Exact locations of sites are not included, and site names are anonymised. \n","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/R013365/1","NE/X018261/1"],"identifier":"ada28810-040b-4fef-8669-b21bac64a10b","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["C.S.","N.G.A.","C.L.","E.","R.L.","S.F.P.","J.G.","D.J."],"familyName":["Moody","Bell","Mackay","Kitson","Gasior","Hunt","Greenwood","Ashley"],"fullName":["Cat Moody","Moody, C.S.","Bell, N.G.A.","Mackay, C.L.","Kitson, E.","Gasior, R.L.","Hunt, S.F.P.","Greenwood, J.G.","Ashley, D.J."],"keyword":["Water quality","Soil","Environmental survey","Peat","Organic matter"],"keywordsTheme":["Water quality","Soil","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Peat","Organic matter"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Fieldwork instrumentation used: water samples were collected from surface waters using a 1L beaker on a 2m pole. \nMethods of collection: 50mL of water from the beaker was filtered on site into a small centrifuge tube, then kept cold and dark as possible until storage in a fridge at 4 degrees in the lab. 2-3L of water were also collected in a 5L caddy to use for organic matter extraction and analysis. \nHow values were arrived at (e.g. treatments etc.): samples were analysed in the lab on analytical equipment frequently calibrated. Standards were included in every analytical run. \nNature and units of recorded variables: each variable was recorded in suitable units, please see the metadata for full information.\nProcessing steps performed on the data: all values were 'sense-checked' to ensure they were possible (e.g. within known bonding restrictions) \nQuality control/assessment applied to the data: replicates were checked and all extreme values were traced back through the process to ensure there had been no errors. \nLimitations on the data’s reliability: these data represent the water chemistry of surface waters on the day they were collected. ","locations":["POLYGON((-8.351 53.041, -8.351 61.186, 1.187 61.186, 1.187 53.041, -8.351 53.041))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-7416"],"organisation":["University of Leeds","University of Edinburgh","Rosalind Franklin Institute","UKCEH","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ada28810-040b-4fef-8669-b21bac64a10b","10.5285/ada28810-040b-4fef-8669-b21bac64a10b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["University of Leeds"],"ror":["https://ror.org/024mrxd33","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Spatial and temporal water chemistry data and organic matter composition from UK surface waters, 2018-2021","topic":["0/Water quality/","0/Soil/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","katwri"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains water chemistry and organic matter composition variables. Water chemistry variables include pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients, anions, cations and metal concentrations. Organic matter composition variables..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-02-11T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Independent consultant"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","M.E.","R.F."],"authorFamilyName":["Woodcock","Edwards","Pywell"],"authorFullName":["Woodcock, B.A.","Edwards, M.E.","Pywell, R.F."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset describes the functional effects traits derived for 57 taxonomic units (species, genus and family level classifications) of oilseed rape insect pollinators. This data provides information on both morphological and behavioural traits, typically at the species level, but also at a generic and functional group level. \n\nData acquisition was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under research programme NE/N018125/1 Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems (ASSIST). ASSIST is an initiative jointly supported by NERC and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/N018125/1"],"identifier":"f09a0ada-b5c6-4dd9-9c7b-2fed23ab79b1","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["B.A.","M.E.","R.F.","Ben"],"familyName":["Woodcock","Edwards","Pywell"],"fullName":["Woodcock, B.A.","Edwards, M.E.","Pywell, R.F.","Woodcock, B."],"keyword":["ASSIST","Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems","Animal behaviour","Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Pollinators","Andrena cineraria","Andrena dorsata","Andrena fulva","Andrena miranda","Andrena scotica","Andrena thaspii","Apis mellifera","Athalia rosae","Bibio marci","Bombus borealis","Bombus flavifrons","Bombus frigidus","Bombus hortorum","Bombus hypnorum","Bombus impatiens","Bombus jonellus","Bombus lapidarius","Bombus melanopygus","Bombus nevadensis","Bombus pascuorum","Bombus pratorum","Bombus rufocinctus","Bombus soroeensis","Bombus subterraneus","Bombus sylvarum","Bombus ternarius","Bombus terricola","Bombus vagans","Episyrphus balteatus","Eucera chinensis","Pseudopanurgus parvus","Syritta pipiens","Syrphus vitripennis","Syrphus ribesii","Andrena sp.","Anthophora sp","Bombus Psithyrus sp","Nomada sp","Ceratina sp","Hylaeus sp","Sphecodes sp","Halictus sp","Lassiglossum spp","Megachile sp","Osmia sp","Polistes sp","Chloromyia sp","Eristalis spp","Helophilus spp","Melanostoma spp","Platycheirus sp","Sphaerophoria spp","Brassica napus"],"keywordsProject":["ASSIST","Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Systems"],"keywordsTheme":["Animal behaviour","Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Pollinators"],"keywordsOther":["Andrena cineraria","Andrena dorsata","Andrena fulva","Andrena miranda","Andrena scotica","Andrena thaspii","Apis mellifera","Athalia rosae","Bibio marci","Bombus borealis","Bombus flavifrons","Bombus frigidus","Bombus hortorum","Bombus hypnorum","Bombus impatiens","Bombus jonellus","Bombus lapidarius","Bombus melanopygus","Bombus nevadensis","Bombus pascuorum","Bombus pratorum","Bombus rufocinctus","Bombus soroeensis","Bombus subterraneus","Bombus sylvarum","Bombus ternarius","Bombus terricola","Bombus vagans","Episyrphus balteatus","Eucera chinensis","Pseudopanurgus parvus","Syritta pipiens","Syrphus vitripennis","Syrphus ribesii","Andrena sp.","Anthophora sp","Bombus Psithyrus sp","Nomada sp","Ceratina sp","Hylaeus sp","Sphecodes sp","Halictus sp","Lassiglossum spp","Megachile sp","Osmia sp","Polistes sp","Chloromyia sp","Eristalis spp","Helophilus spp","Melanostoma spp","Platycheirus sp","Sphaerophoria spp","Brassica napus"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"We derived behavioural and morphological traits that had a high likelihood of affecting the success and rate with which pollen is transferred to the stigmas of oilseed rape (effect traits). These traits were: 1) body length; 2-6) quantification of behavioural interactions with oilseed rape flowers (e.g. time spent on flowers, pollen foraging and dry pollen on bodies); Trait 7) an index of overall body hairiness; Traits 8-14) morphological characteristics affecting pollen retention on bodies linked to the presence of corbicula and scopa; Trait 14-15) pollen availability dictated by whether or not pollen is carried within bee crops; Trait 15) mouthpart structure. Traits 8-15 are associated with bees, however, their absence will affect the pollen carrying capacity for non-bee species and as such are relevant cross taxon effect traits.","orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Independent consultant","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/f09a0ada-b5c6-4dd9-9c7b-2fed23ab79b1","10.5285/f09a0ada-b5c6-4dd9-9c7b-2fed23ab79b1"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Non-geographic dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalName":["ASSIST website"],"title":"Species traits and derivation of hairiness of oilseed rape pollinators","topic":["0/Animal behaviour/","0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/","0/Pollinators/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset describes the functional effects traits derived for 57 taxonomic units (species, genus and family level classifications) of oilseed rape insect pollinators. This data provides information on both morphological and behavioural traits, typically at the..."},{"publicationDate":"2024-07-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology"],"authorGivenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"authorFamilyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"authorFullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Nature Conservancy Council. A census of deciduous woodlands in Scotland was made (as marked on British Ordnance Survey (OS) maps, 7th Series 1:63,360), between 1976 and 1979. A desk-based map search was undertaken in the first instance, followed by field ground-truthing.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","Nature Conservancy Council"],"identifier":"7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"familyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"fullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The data were originally collected by members of staff at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, first as a desk-based exercise, and then during a field survey. A data rescue exercise was undertaken to re-digitise the data from the raw data sheets between 2019 and 2023. Quality checks were undertaken both at the time of the field collection, and later following data entry. Further detail is available in the supporting documentation.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","10.5285/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Extent and tree species composition from a Scottish deciduous woodland survey, 1976-1979","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","jashun"],"shortenedDescription":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-02-03T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Brighton","Exeter University","University of Hull","University of Birmingham","National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool"],"authorGivenName":["P.","A. ","D.","G.","C."],"authorFamilyName":["Ashworth","Nicholas","Parsons","Sambrook Smith","Unsworth"],"authorFullName":["Ashworth, P.","Nicholas, A.","Parsons, D.","Sambrook Smith, G.","Unsworth, C."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-1182"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data were collected in 2017, to provide information on spatial patterns of dune migration rates and associated water flow characteristics, at locations on the South Saskatchewan River, Canada. Dune migration rates were measured using repeat aerial imagery. Bedform crests were digitised in individual images, and average dune migration rates were calculated from the mean migration distance between image pairs, divided by the time between image collection. Water depth and velocity data were collected using a Sontek M9 acoustic Doppler current profiler (aDcp) mounted on a small zodiac boat. The position of the aDcp was recorded using a RTK dGPS system. Data were collected on 12th June 2017 as part of NERC project NE/L00738X/1","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/L00738X/1"],"identifier":"864434b7-2102-4edc-802d-ebdbfe9ff766","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["P.","A. ","D.","G.","C.","Andrew"],"familyName":["Ashworth","Nicholas","Parsons","Sambrook Smith","Unsworth"],"fullName":["Ashworth, P.","Nicholas, A.","Parsons, D.","Sambrook Smith, G.","Unsworth, C."],"keyword":["Canada","Mapping","Environmental survey","dune","flowing water"],"keywordsPlace":["Canada"],"keywordsTheme":["Mapping","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["dune","flowing water"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Data were collected to provide information on spatial patterns of dune migration rates and associated flow characteristics, at locations on the South Saskatchewan River, Canada. Dune migration rates were measured using repeat aerial imagery with flight lines completed on a grid pattern with 80% lateral and longitudinal overlap between images. Orthomosaics were constructed from these images using the SfM program Pix4D (https://pix4d.com/). Multiple flights were flown at 1 hour intervals (maximum of five epochs in a day) to allow tracking of bedforms. Image Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) was typically 0.025–0.03 m. Bedform crests were digitised in individual images, and average dune migration rates were calculated from the mean migration distance between image pairs, divided by the time between image collection. Data were collected on 12th June 2017.\n\nWater depth and velocity data were collected using a Sontek M9 acoustic Doppler current profiler (aDcp) mounted on a small zodiac boat. The position of the aDcp was recorded using a RTK dGPS system. Velocities are calculated relative to the instrument head and are corrected using the dGPS calculated boat speed and heading. The aDcp data were collected in pulse coherent mode, averaging 7 pings per second, and were averaged to 1 Hz to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The M9 uses 9 transducers at frequencies between 0.5 and 3.0 MHz. Data were collected along cross-sections of the river that extended between both banks and were aligned approximately perpendicular to the downstream flow direction.\n","locations":["POLYGON((-110.919 52.403, -110.919 55.875, -101.645 55.875, -101.645 52.403, -110.919 52.403))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-1182"],"organisation":["University of Brighton","Exeter University","University of Hull","University of Birmingham","National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/864434b7-2102-4edc-802d-ebdbfe9ff766","10.5285/864434b7-2102-4edc-802d-ebdbfe9ff766"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","ror":["https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Dune migration measurements on the South Saskatchewan River, Canada, 2017","topic":["0/Mapping/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"Data were collected in 2017, to provide information on spatial patterns of dune migration rates and associated water flow characteristics, at locations on the South Saskatchewan River, Canada. Dune migration rates were measured using repeat aerial imagery. Bedform crests..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-07-07T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["H","H. T.","B A","P O","K","G","S J"],"authorFamilyName":["Feuchtmayr","Carter","Dodd","Keenan","Le Quesne","McShane","Moorhouse","Rankin","Rhodes","Thackeray"],"authorFullName":["Feuchtmayr, H.","Carter, H.T.","Dodd, B.A.","Keenan, P.O.","Le Quesne, K.","McShane, G.","Moorhouse, H.","Rankin, G.","Rhodes, G.","Thackeray, S.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-4843"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This is part of an ongoing long-term monitoring dataset of surface temperature, surface oxygen, water clarity, water chemistry and phytoplankton chlorophyll a from fortnightly sampling at the South Basin of Windermere in Cumbria, England, that began in 1945 for some variables. The data have been collected by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH). The data available to download comprise surface temperature (TEMP) in degree Celsius, surface oxygen saturation (OXYG) in % air-saturation, Secchi depth (SECC) in metres, alkalinity (ALKA) in µg per litre as CaCO3 and pH. Total ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4N), total oxidised nitrogen (TON), soluble reactive phosphate (PO4P), total phosphorus (TOTP), dissolved reactive silicon expressed as SiO2 (SIO2) and phytoplankton chlorophyll a (TOCA) are all given in µg per litre. Water samples are based on a sample integrated from 0 to 7m. Water chemistry values below the detection limit, are indicated by a < sign in the column titled ‘sign(if