{"numFound":65,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=funder%7CNatural+Environment+Research+Council&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?page=2&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=funder%7CNatural+Environment+Research+Council&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F","results":[{"publicationDate":"2025-07-11T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service"],"authorGivenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"authorFamilyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"authorFullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at multiple locations. Trapping at each location typically involved 3-5 nights per trap line, but this could vary. The trap lines typically comprised 12 pairs of traps each set 10 metres apart along a transect line, with geographical coordinates for the centre of a pair of traps along the trap line. Animals were primarily captured for tissue collection for genetic analysis (not included in this dataset) to investigate the effectiveness of habitat corridors for promoting movement.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)"],"grant":["NE/T006935/1"],"identifier":"de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"familyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"fullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Animals were captured during standardized trapping surveys with Sherman traps, and Tomahawk traps in systematic arrays. Trapping targeted small-medium sized rodents, carnivores and opossums. Captured animals were identified to species, marked individually, biometrics were recorded (ear size, hind foot and tail length), and tissue samples were collected, generally from the ear. The animals were then released alive. Trap and capture data are linked via a primary key field.\nAt each trap check, data from captured animals were recorded in the field on data sheets, and then later computerized by entering into spreadsheets. Data were checked against original field records for quality assurance and validation.\n","locations":["POLYGON((33.559 -4.912, 33.559 5.269, 42.084 5.269, 42.084 -4.912, 33.559 -4.912))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Monitoring data from small mammal trapping in forest habitats in Kenya, 2021-2022","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","elsdhi"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at..."},{"publicationDate":"2023-08-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects"],"authorGivenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B."],"authorFamilyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"authorFullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The parties involved in data collection are listed in the author section.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/W004216/1"],"identifier":"b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B.","Dylan"],"familyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"fullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Images were collected by Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth, and Diopsis camera systems. AMI systems captured images at 10 minute intervals and upon the detection of movement. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island during night time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. There are no missing data.","locations":["POLYGON((-79.869 9.135, -79.869 9.181, -79.817 9.181, -79.817 9.135, -79.869 9.135))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","10.5285/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":" Images of nocturnal insects collected in a trial of three automated camera systems on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, January 2023","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The..."},{"publicationDate":"2018-08-30T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","R.F."],"authorFamilyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"authorFullName":["Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive combination of B. terrestris and Lasioglossum spp. \n\nThe experimental design includes no pollinator controls nested within individual tomato plants exposed to the above pollinator species treatment combinations. This research was undertaken in 2017 and funded though a UKCEH Commercial Innovation Fund (National Capability) project supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (Project NEC06344).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Ben","B.A.","R.F."],"familyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"fullName":["Woodcock, B.","Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"keyword":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators","bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"keywordsTheme":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators"],"keywordsOther":["bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Three treatment combinations of bee pollinators foraging on tomatoes were compared: \n 1) B. terrestris alone (a single 30-40 worker colony);\n 2) Lasioglossum spp. alone, predominantly malachurum but with some pauxillum);\n 3) a combination of B. terrestris (a single 30-40 worker colony) and Lasioglossum spp.. \n\nAll experiments were undertaken under field conditions within three, 2 x 3 m net cages designed to hold free flying bees. B. terrestris colonies were obtained as commercially available stock (Biobest Ltd) but there is no equivalent for Lasioglossum spp.. To address this resident populations of L. malachurum and L. pauxillum were identified. These were found on bare and compacted soil oil of arable field corners. Over populations of Lasioglossum spp. two net cages were established, with a third in close proximity although not covering populations of the Lasioglossum spp.. Into this latter cage a B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was established. A further B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was allowed to forage in one of the cages covering Lasioglossum nests (Treatment 3), while the other was left without such a colony (Treatment 2). Population density of Lasioglossum in both cages was broadly equivalent, with c. 4.2 (± 0.8) nest borrows m-2. Treatment combinations were additive in terms of bee density reflecting likely practice under greenhouse growing conditions. Nets were only positioned over supporting cages on days when the experiment was being undertaken, to prevent starving of wild Lasioglossum populations. \n\nAs tomato plants produce no nectar it was necessary to cage a small quantity of Asteraceae garden plants to provide a nectar source for the bees. Experimental tomato plants (var. 'Moneymaker') were established under controlled greenhouse conditions where pollinators were excluded and were translocated to the experimental site when they had multiple flowering stems. Assessments were restricted to the first five mature flowers on each stem; subsequent flowers were removed. On each plant two flowering stems were selected, one was left open to pollination in the cages with treatments 1-3, the other was treated as a control and covered in a small net bag to prevent access by pollinators. Batches of five plants were placed in each of the three cages for a four-day period, with this repeated four times. After each period of exposure all plants were returned to greenhouse conditions and left to mature. When tomatoes had reached the same point of maturation (deep red colour) the number of fruits produced was counted (out of a maximum of five per stem) and the individual mass of each fruit was determined.","locations":["POLYGON((-1.196 51.632, -1.196 51.634, -1.195 51.634, -1.195 51.632, -1.196 51.632))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.","topic":["0/Agriculture/","0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental risk/","0/Pollinators/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","phtr"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive..."},{"publicationDate":"2021-02-26T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"authorFamilyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"authorFullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to grassy vegetation, deciduous trees and bacteria; no dose rate estimates for grassy vegetation have been made for those sites where grassy vegetation was absent.\n\nRadiation from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident killed coniferous trees in a 4-6 km2 area of forest to the west of the power plant. This area is now known as the 'Red Forest’ and it has subsequently regenerated with understorey vegetation and deciduous trees; it is the most anthropogenically contaminated radioactive ecosystem on Earth. In July 2016 a severe fire burnt (to varying degrees) c. 80 percent of the Red Forest; this presented a unique opportunity to study the impact of radiation on the recovery of forest ecosystems exposed to a secondary stressor (fire). To investigate this, in September 2017 the RED FIRE project set up sixty study plots in the Red Forest (in burnt and unburnt areas) with a further nine plots established close to Buriakivka village (approximately 8 km from the Red Forest).\n\nVegetation samples from each plot were harvested using shears in September 2017. Each sample was sorted into ‘grassy’ and ‘other’ vegetation; these were air-dried (20-25 degrees Celsius) and the grassy vegetation samples homogenised prior to radionuclide analyses.\n\nSoil core samples collected in September 2017 were bulked, homogenised and sub-samples taken for determination of pH and percentage moisture determined by oven drying (approximately 60 degrees Celsius) to a constant mass. The remaining soil sample was used for the determination of radionuclide activity concentrations; prior to analyses, these samples were dried at approximately 80 degrees Celsius.\n\nThis work was funded by the NERC, Grant Ref: NE/P015212/1 (RED FIRE: Radioactive Environment Damaged by fire: a Forest In Recovery)","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/P015212/1"],"identifier":"60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"familyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"fullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"keyword":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter","Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl","Radioecology","Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"keywordsInstrument":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter"],"keywordsPlace":["Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl"],"keywordsTheme":["Radioecology"],"keywordsOther":["Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Cs-137 activity concentrations were determined in grassy vegetation and soil using a high-purity germanium γ-detector (Model GC3019, Canberra-Packard, Connecticut, USA). A standard 137Cs/152Eu source (OISN-1; Applied Ecology Laboratory of Environmental Safety Centre, Odessa, Ukraine) was used for calibration. The minimal detectable activity was approximately 0.18 Bq per sample with uncertainties of approximately 10-15 percent (p=0.95) depending on the sample type. \n\nSr-90 activity concentrations were determined in soil and grassy vegetation samples using a β-spectrometer (EXPRESS-01) with a thin-filmed (0.1 mm) plastic scintillator detector. No radiochemical pre-treatment was required and samples were analysed as a solid matrix. Daily calibrations were conducted. Spectra were processed by correlating the sample spectra with those obtained from standard sources and those obtained from background measurements; uncertainties were approximately 20 percent (p=0.95).\nPrior to processing to determine activity concentrations of 241Am and Pu isotopes in soil samples, 242Pu and 243Am were added as yield tracers. Samples were dissolved in HF followed by treatment with HNO3, HCl, H3BO3+HNO3 and 8M HNO3. Plutonium and Am were separated using anion exchange resin (Bio Rad AG 1 × 8, 100-200 mesh). The Pu fraction was evaporated. Americium was precipitated with calcium oxalate and then separated using TRU resin columns; lanthanides were removed using an anion exchange resin column. Thin alpha sources of each separated actinide element were prepared by micro co-precipitation with neodymium fluoride and analysed using a Canberra Alpha Analyst alpha spectrometer. Counting errors were typically <20 percent.\n\nTo estimate the activity concentrations of Am-241 and Pu-isotopes for grassy vegetation transfer parameters (CRwo-soil) for Agrostis gigantea from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4) together with the appropriate measured soil activity concentration (DM). To estimate Sr-90 and Cs-137 activity concentrations in deciduous trees CRwo-soil values from sites within the CEZ were used (Holiaka et al. 2020) together with the measured soil activity concentrations (dry mass); for Am-241 and Pu-isotopes CRwo-soil values for Pinus sylvestris (wood) from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4).\n\nWeighted absorbed dose rate estimations for grassy vegetation and deciduous tree wood were made using the ERICA Tool http://www.erica-tool.com/ (version 1.3) and the revised ‘R&D128’ spreadsheet model (https://wiki.ceh.ac.uk/display/rpemain/Ar+-+Kr+-+Xe+dose+calculator) was used to estimate the weighted absorbed dose to bacteria. The ambient dose rate (µSv h-1) on the soil surface was measured at each study plot using a MKS-01R meter.","locations":["POLYGON((30.001 51.342, 30.001 51.415, 30.091 51.415, 30.091 51.342, 30.001 51.342))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","10.5285/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalName":["TREE website","REDFIRE website","CHAR webpage"],"title":"Soil and vegetation radionuclide activity concentrations and calculated dose rates from the Red Forest, Chernobyl, Ukraine, 2016-2017","topic":["0/Radioecology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","danor"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-03-27T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University"],"authorGivenName":["S.","W.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"authorFullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["S.","W.","A.","Stephen"],"familyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"fullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Samples & Validation of the array was carried out using a subset of 87 samples, which included four species of pine (Pinus sylvestris: SY; P. mugo: MU; P. uncinata: UN; P. uliginosa: UL). DNA was extracted from needles using a Qiagen DNeasy 96 kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Needles were dried on silica gel prior to extraction and DNA was quantified using a Qubit spectrophotometer to ensure a minimum standardized concentration of 35ng/µl. The quality of genomic DNA was also checked visually for fragmentation on 1% agarose gel.\n\n Genotyping was done at Edinburgh Genomics following DNA amplification, fragmentation, chip hybridisation, single-base extension through DNA ligation and signal amplification performed according to the Affymetrix Axiom® Assay protocol. Genotyping was performed in 384-well format on a GeneTitan according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Genotype calls were performed using Axiom Analysis Suite software as recommended by the manufacturer (ThermoFisher). Samples were assigned to an analysis group based on their call rate (CR) and dish QC (DQC: a metric provided by ThermoFisher which is generated by measuring signals at multiple sites in the genome known not to vary among individuals), using the following thresholds: DQC 'high' ≥ 0.82; DQC 'low' < 0.82; CR 'high' ≥ 96; CR 'low' < 96. Analyses: 1) DQC high + CR high; 2) DQC high + CR low; 3) DQC low + CR low. High quality samples (N=529), with high CR and DQC, were used to set thresholds for allele calls. Posteriors for allele calls were subsequently used as priors for analyses 2 (N = 753) and 3 (N = 251).","locations":["POLYGON((-18.359 37.192, -18.359 67.115, 24.839 67.115, 24.839 37.192, -18.359 37.192))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","10.5285/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Scots pine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for Axiom array validation","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex."},{"publicationDate":"2024-07-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology"],"authorGivenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"authorFamilyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"authorFullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Nature Conservancy Council. A census of deciduous woodlands in Scotland was made (as marked on British Ordnance Survey (OS) maps, 7th Series 1:63,360), between 1976 and 1979. A desk-based map search was undertaken in the first instance, followed by field ground-truthing.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","Nature Conservancy Council"],"identifier":"7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"familyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"fullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The data were originally collected by members of staff at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, first as a desk-based exercise, and then during a field survey. A data rescue exercise was undertaken to re-digitise the data from the raw data sheets between 2019 and 2023. Quality checks were undertaken both at the time of the field collection, and later following data entry. Further detail is available in the supporting documentation.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","10.5285/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Extent and tree species composition from a Scottish deciduous woodland survey, 1976-1979","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","jashun"],"shortenedDescription":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-07-07T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["H","H. T.","B A","P O","K","G","S J"],"authorFamilyName":["Feuchtmayr","Carter","Dodd","Keenan","Le Quesne","McShane","Moorhouse","Rankin","Rhodes","Thackeray"],"authorFullName":["Feuchtmayr, H.","Carter, H.T.","Dodd, B.A.","Keenan, P.O.","Le Quesne, K.","McShane, G.","Moorhouse, H.","Rankin, G.","Rhodes, G.","Thackeray, S.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-4843"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This is part of an ongoing long-term monitoring dataset of surface temperature, surface oxygen, water clarity, water chemistry and phytoplankton chlorophyll a from fortnightly sampling at the South Basin of Windermere in Cumbria, England, that began in 1945 for some variables. The data have been collected by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH). The data available to download comprise surface temperature (TEMP) in degree Celsius, surface oxygen saturation (OXYG) in % air-saturation, Secchi depth (SECC) in metres, alkalinity (ALKA) in µg per litre as CaCO3 and pH. Total ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4N), total oxidised nitrogen (TON), soluble reactive phosphate (PO4P), total phosphorus (TOTP), dissolved reactive silicon expressed as SiO2 (SIO2) and phytoplankton chlorophyll a (TOCA) are all given in µg per litre. Water samples are based on a sample integrated from 0 to 7m. Water chemistry values below the detection limit, are indicated by a < sign in the column titled ‘sign(if