{"numFound":166,"page":1,"rows":20,"url":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F&facet=recordType%7CDataset","nextPage":"http://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/eidc/documents?page=2&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+survey%2F&facet=resourceStatus%7CAvailable&facet=rightsHolder%7CUK+Centre+for+Ecology+%26+Hydrology&facet=topic%7C0%2FEnvironmental+risk%2F&facet=topic%7C0%2FRadioecology%2F&facet=recordType%7CDataset","results":[{"publicationDate":"2025-07-11T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service"],"authorGivenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"authorFamilyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"authorFullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at multiple locations. Trapping at each location typically involved 3-5 nights per trap line, but this could vary. The trap lines typically comprised 12 pairs of traps each set 10 metres apart along a transect line, with geographical coordinates for the centre of a pair of traps along the trap line. Animals were primarily captured for tissue collection for genetic analysis (not included in this dataset) to investigate the effectiveness of habitat corridors for promoting movement.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)"],"grant":["NE/T006935/1"],"identifier":"de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["J.M.","P.","R.K."," A.J.","E.S.","C.","J.M.J.","E.","A.","D.","L.","H.","G."],"familyName":["Bullock","Beier","Broughton","Gregory","Spence","Burkett","Travis","Amutabi","Analo","Atai","Espira","Kipleting","Juma","Lukaria","Makalasia","Malema","Wendot"],"fullName":["Bullock, J.M.","Beier, P.","Broughton, R.K.","Gregory, A.J.","Spence, E.S.","Burkett, C.","Travis, J.M.J.","Amutabi, C.","Analo, C.","Atai, E.","Espira, A.","Kipleting, D.","Juma, C.","Lukaria, L.","Makalasia, C.","Malema, H.","Wendot, G."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["carnivores","forest","animal corridor","habitat corridors","mustelid","rodent","Sherman traps","woodland ecosystem","woodland"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Animals were captured during standardized trapping surveys with Sherman traps, and Tomahawk traps in systematic arrays. Trapping targeted small-medium sized rodents, carnivores and opossums. Captured animals were identified to species, marked individually, biometrics were recorded (ear size, hind foot and tail length), and tissue samples were collected, generally from the ear. The animals were then released alive. Trap and capture data are linked via a primary key field.\nAt each trap check, data from captured animals were recorded in the field on data sheets, and then later computerized by entering into spreadsheets. Data were checked against original field records for quality assurance and validation.\n","locations":["POLYGON((33.559 -4.912, 33.559 5.269, 42.084 5.269, 42.084 -4.912, 33.559 -4.912))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-4343","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-3236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-0167","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-4272"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation","University of North Texas","University of Aberdeen","Eco2librium Company Ltd","Wildlife Research & Training Institute","Unaffiliated","Kenya Forest Service","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/de1d9de7-c0b9-4e53-b848-334bcf120d2c"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Center for Large Landscape Conservation"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/02bv7qz69","https://ror.org/00v97ad02","https://ror.org/016476m91","https://ror.org/0526r9902","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Monitoring data from small mammal trapping in forest habitats in Kenya, 2021-2022","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","elsdhi"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains information on the trap-setting operations and the number and species of animals captured during systematic sampling surveys in natural habitats of Kenya between 2021 and 2022. The trapping data include dates of setting, checking and removal at..."},{"publicationDate":"2015-03-04T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","C.","S.","H.J.","J.M.","A.J.","I.J.","N.A."],"authorFamilyName":["Barnett","Wells","Thacker","Guyatt","Fletcher","Lawlor","Winfield","Beresford"],"authorFullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Wells, C.","Thacker, S.","Guyatt, H.J.","Fletcher, J.M.","Lawlor, A.J.","Winfield, I.J.","Beresford, N.A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-8449","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-5114","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data comprise concentrations of elements in ashed fish sampled from lakes in the English Lake District in 2012 and 2013. Fish were collected from three lakes (Windermere, Bassenthwaite Lake and Derwent Water) by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) Lake Ecosystems group. Fish species collected were Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca fluviatilis), Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus), Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Pike (Esox lucius) and Vendace (Coregonus albula). All samples were ashed prior to analysis by ICPMS or ICPOES to determine elemental concentrations.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"ed90df1b-462c-46bb-afbd-59794fb03f6b","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["Cath","C.L.","C.","S.","H.J.","J.M.","A.J.","I.J.","N.A."],"familyName":["Barnett","Wells","Thacker","Guyatt","Fletcher","Lawlor","Winfield","Beresford"],"fullName":["Barnett, C.","Barnett, C.L.","Wells, C.","Thacker, S.","Guyatt, H.J.","Fletcher, J.M.","Lawlor, A.J.","Winfield, I.J.","Beresford, N.A."],"keyword":["Lake District","Windermere","Bassenthwaite Lake","Derwent Water","Radioecology","Water quality","Coregonus albula","Esox lucius","Salmo trutta","Gymnocephalus cernua","Perca fluviatilis","Rutilus rutilus"],"keywordsPlace":["Lake District","Windermere","Bassenthwaite Lake","Derwent Water"],"keywordsTheme":["Radioecology","Water quality"],"keywordsOther":["Coregonus albula","Esox lucius","Salmo trutta","Gymnocephalus cernua","Perca fluviatilis","Rutilus rutilus"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Fish were collected in 2012 and 2013 from Windermere, Bassenthwaite Lake and Derwent Water in the English Lake District. Species collected were: Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Perch (Perca fluviatilis), Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus), Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Pike (Esox lucius) and Vendace (Coregonus albula). Samples were frozen to minus 20 degrees Centigrade as soon as possible after collection. Fish samples were thoroughly defrosted, weighed and gutted prior to the whole-fish being ashed at 500°C. The ash was then weighed. Ashed fish samples were digested using an aqua regia reagent (fresh 3:1 mixture of concentrated HNO3 and HCl aristar grade) at 175°C for 12 minutes using a microwave oven (CEM, MarsXpress). Analysis of the ashed fish digests was then conducted by ICPMS (Perkin Elmer, NeXION 300D) or ICPOES (Perkin Elmer, 7300 DV). ICPMS measurements were made using two types of instrument operation, either quantitative or semi-quantitative (using Perkin Elmer Total Quant software). The quantitative measurements were made using external calibration after spiking the digests with 10 microgram per litre Ga, In and Re as internal standards to compensate for instrumental drift and matrix effects. The semi-quantitative measurements were made using the ICPMS instrument operating in kinetic energy discrimination (KED) mode with the addition of helium gas. The semi-quantitative and quantitative modes differed as the former used an element concentration to intensity response curve to extrapolate concentrations over a wide mass range. ICPMS and ICPOES instrument limits of detection (LOD) were calculated using mean and standard deviation measurements for the digestion reagent blank (yb, plus sb where yb is blank concentration and sb is three standard deviations of the blank). Method LODs were then calculated taking into account the dilution arising from the digestion procedure. Note that for some elements determined using the semi-quantitative ICPMS method it was not possible to determine instrument LODs from the analysis of a digestion reagent blank and in these cases the instrument LODs were estimated from an assessment of instrument sensitivity and assigned a values of 0.001 microgram per litre (equivalent to a mean method LOD of 0.001 milligrams per kilogram). Results are reported as milligrams per kilogram fresh weight (converted from ash weight using fresh to ash weight ratio for each sample).","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-8449","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-5114","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1420712455477","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/ed90df1b-462c-46bb-afbd-59794fb03f6b","10.5285/ed90df1b-462c-46bb-afbd-59794fb03f6b"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Elemental concentrations in fish from lakes in Northwest England","topic":["0/Radioecology/","0/Water quality/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clamw"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise concentrations of elements in ashed fish sampled from lakes in the English Lake District in 2012 and 2013. Fish were collected from three lakes (Windermere, Bassenthwaite Lake and Derwent Water) by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) Lake Ecosystems..."},{"publicationDate":"2016-07-06T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","B.","P.M.","E.","D.","S.A.","Z.","S.","A.J.","J.","D.A.","A.","C.M.","C."],"authorFamilyName":["Emmett","Reynolds","Chamberlain","Rowe","Spurgeon","Brittain","Frogbrook","Hughes","Lawlor","Poskitt","Potter","Robinson","Scott","Wood","Woods"],"authorFullName":["Emmett, B.A.","Reynolds, B.","Chamberlain, P.M.","Rowe, E.","Spurgeon, D.","Brittain, S.A.","Frogbrook, Z.","Hughes, S.","Lawlor, A.J.","Poskitt, J.","Potter, E.","Robinson, D.A.","Scott, A.","Wood, C.M.","Woods, C."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-8760","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (Mineral-N) from soils sampled from up to 256 1km squares across Great Britain in 2007. The Countryside Survey is a unique study or 'audit' of the natural resources of the UK's countryside. The sample sites are chosen from a stratified random sample, based on a 15 by 15 km grid of GB. Surveys have been carried out in 1978, 1984, 1990, 1998 and 2007 by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, with repeated visits to the majority of squares. The countryside is sampled and surveyed using rigorous scientific methods, allowing us to compare new results with those from previous surveys. In this way we can detect the gradual and subtle changes that occur in the UK's countryside over time. In addition to soil data, habitat areas, vegetation species data, linear habitat data, and freshwater habitat data are also gathered by Countryside Survey.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Bridget","B.A.","B.","P.M.","E.","D.","S.A.","Z.","S.","A.J.","J.","D.A.","A.","C.M.","C."],"familyName":["Emmett","Reynolds","Chamberlain","Rowe","Spurgeon","Brittain","Frogbrook","Hughes","Lawlor","Poskitt","Potter","Robinson","Scott","Wood","Woods"],"fullName":["Emmett, B.","Emmett, B.A.","Reynolds, B.","Chamberlain, P.M.","Rowe, E.","Spurgeon, D.","Brittain, S.A.","Frogbrook, Z.","Hughes, S.","Lawlor, A.J.","Poskitt, J.","Potter, E.","Robinson, D.A.","Scott, A.","Wood, C.M.","Woods, C."],"keyword":["Soil","Environmental survey","mineral-N","mineralisable nitrogen","topsoil"],"keywordsTheme":["Soil","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["mineral-N","mineralisable nitrogen","topsoil"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Soil samples were collected in the summer of 2007 by professional field surveyors. Soils were sampled from up to 591 1km squares sited across Britain, selected by random stratified sample. A sub-sample from up to 256 1km squares were analysed for mineral-N according to standardised protocols at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in 2007. Data are managed by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 49.864, -8.648 60.861, 1.768 60.861, 1.768 49.864, -8.648 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3264-8760","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759","10.5285/3bafb72b-9f2a-4cbc-a7b8-46e3731c6759"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (mineral-N) data 2007 [Countryside Survey]","topic":["0/Soil/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clamw"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset consists of measures of topsoil mineralisable nitrogen (Mineral-N) from soils sampled from up to 256 1km squares across Great Britain in 2007. The Countryside Survey is a unique study or 'audit' of the natural resources of the UK's countryside. The sample..."},{"publicationDate":"2023-08-23T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects"],"authorGivenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B."],"authorFamilyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"authorFullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The parties involved in data collection are listed in the author section.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/W004216/1"],"identifier":"b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.","Y.","D.","A.","T.T.","C.","M.","S.","D.B.","Dylan"],"familyName":["August","Basset","Boislard","Carbone","Gomez-Segura","Høye","Huijbers","Larrivée","Schmidt","Teagle","Roy"],"fullName":["August, T.","Basset, Y.","Boislard, T.","Carbone, D.","Gomez-Segura, A.","Høye, T.T.","Huijbers, C.","Larrivée, M.","Schmidt, C.","Teagle, S.","Roy, D.B."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Panama","Barro Colorado Island","Winged insects","AMI"],"licence":"Non-Open government licence","lineage":"Images were collected by Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth, and Diopsis camera systems. AMI systems captured images at 10 minute intervals and upon the detection of movement. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island during night time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. There are no missing data.","locations":["POLYGON((-79.869 9.135, -79.869 9.181, -79.817 9.181, -79.817 9.135, -79.869 9.135))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-5717","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-2684","https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5290-786X","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-7262","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-3415","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-3736","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-1890","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-8435","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-0331"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Smithsonian Institution, US","Insectarium de Montréal","Aarhus University","Naturalis Biodiversity Center","Canadian National Collection of Insects","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324","10.5285/b088d4bd-4abb-46d4-bc90-f4e58c65f324"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":" Images of nocturnal insects collected in a trial of three automated camera systems on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, January 2023","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"Dataset contains images recorded during a trial of Automated Monitoring of Insects (AMI), Automoth and Diopsis camera systems. The images were taken at five sites in Barro Colorado Island, Panama, during night-time hours from the 23rd to the 26th of January 2023. The..."},{"publicationDate":"2018-08-30T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["B.A.","R.F."],"authorFamilyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"authorFullName":["Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive combination of B. terrestris and Lasioglossum spp. \n\nThe experimental design includes no pollinator controls nested within individual tomato plants exposed to the above pollinator species treatment combinations. This research was undertaken in 2017 and funded though a UKCEH Commercial Innovation Fund (National Capability) project supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (Project NEC06344).","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["Ben","B.A.","R.F."],"familyName":["Woodcock","Pywell"],"fullName":["Woodcock, B.","Woodcock, B.A.","Pywell, R.F."],"keyword":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators","bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"keywordsTheme":["Agriculture","Biodiversity","Environmental risk","Pollinators"],"keywordsOther":["bumblebee","Bombus terrestris","bees","Lasioglossum pauxillum","Lasioglossum malachurum"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Three treatment combinations of bee pollinators foraging on tomatoes were compared: \n 1) B. terrestris alone (a single 30-40 worker colony);\n 2) Lasioglossum spp. alone, predominantly malachurum but with some pauxillum);\n 3) a combination of B. terrestris (a single 30-40 worker colony) and Lasioglossum spp.. \n\nAll experiments were undertaken under field conditions within three, 2 x 3 m net cages designed to hold free flying bees. B. terrestris colonies were obtained as commercially available stock (Biobest Ltd) but there is no equivalent for Lasioglossum spp.. To address this resident populations of L. malachurum and L. pauxillum were identified. These were found on bare and compacted soil oil of arable field corners. Over populations of Lasioglossum spp. two net cages were established, with a third in close proximity although not covering populations of the Lasioglossum spp.. Into this latter cage a B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was established. A further B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was allowed to forage in one of the cages covering Lasioglossum nests (Treatment 3), while the other was left without such a colony (Treatment 2). Population density of Lasioglossum in both cages was broadly equivalent, with c. 4.2 (± 0.8) nest borrows m-2. Treatment combinations were additive in terms of bee density reflecting likely practice under greenhouse growing conditions. Nets were only positioned over supporting cages on days when the experiment was being undertaken, to prevent starving of wild Lasioglossum populations. \n\nAs tomato plants produce no nectar it was necessary to cage a small quantity of Asteraceae garden plants to provide a nectar source for the bees. Experimental tomato plants (var. 'Moneymaker') were established under controlled greenhouse conditions where pollinators were excluded and were translocated to the experimental site when they had multiple flowering stems. Assessments were restricted to the first five mature flowers on each stem; subsequent flowers were removed. On each plant two flowering stems were selected, one was left open to pollination in the cages with treatments 1-3, the other was treated as a control and covered in a small net bag to prevent access by pollinators. Batches of five plants were placed in each of the three cages for a four-day period, with this repeated four times. After each period of exposure all plants were returned to greenhouse conditions and left to mature. When tomatoes had reached the same point of maturation (deep red colour) the number of fruits produced was counted (out of a maximum of five per stem) and the individual mass of each fruit was determined.","locations":["POLYGON((-1.196 51.632, -1.196 51.634, -1.195 51.634, -1.195 51.632, -1.196 51.632))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5","10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.","topic":["0/Agriculture/","0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental risk/","0/Pollinators/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","phtr"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive..."},{"publicationDate":"2021-02-26T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"authorFamilyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"authorFullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to grassy vegetation, deciduous trees and bacteria; no dose rate estimates for grassy vegetation have been made for those sites where grassy vegetation was absent.\n\nRadiation from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident killed coniferous trees in a 4-6 km2 area of forest to the west of the power plant. This area is now known as the 'Red Forest’ and it has subsequently regenerated with understorey vegetation and deciduous trees; it is the most anthropogenically contaminated radioactive ecosystem on Earth. In July 2016 a severe fire burnt (to varying degrees) c. 80 percent of the Red Forest; this presented a unique opportunity to study the impact of radiation on the recovery of forest ecosystems exposed to a secondary stressor (fire). To investigate this, in September 2017 the RED FIRE project set up sixty study plots in the Red Forest (in burnt and unburnt areas) with a further nine plots established close to Buriakivka village (approximately 8 km from the Red Forest).\n\nVegetation samples from each plot were harvested using shears in September 2017. Each sample was sorted into ‘grassy’ and ‘other’ vegetation; these were air-dried (20-25 degrees Celsius) and the grassy vegetation samples homogenised prior to radionuclide analyses.\n\nSoil core samples collected in September 2017 were bulked, homogenised and sub-samples taken for determination of pH and percentage moisture determined by oven drying (approximately 60 degrees Celsius) to a constant mass. The remaining soil sample was used for the determination of radionuclide activity concentrations; prior to analyses, these samples were dried at approximately 80 degrees Celsius.\n\nThis work was funded by the NERC, Grant Ref: NE/P015212/1 (RED FIRE: Radioactive Environment Damaged by fire: a Forest In Recovery)","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"grant":["NE/P015212/1"],"identifier":"60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["C.L.","S.","A. ","J.S.","M.D. ","N.A."],"familyName":["Barnett","Gashchak","Maksimenko","Chaplow","Wood","Beresford"],"fullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Gashchak, S.","Maksimenko, A.","Chaplow, J.S.","Wood, M.D.","Beresford, N.A."],"keyword":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter","Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl","Radioecology","Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"keywordsInstrument":["high-purity germanium γ-detector ","β-spectrometer ","MKS-01R meter"],"keywordsPlace":["Chernobyl","Red Forest","Chornobyl"],"keywordsTheme":["Radioecology"],"keywordsOther":["Plot experiment","radionuclide activity","Environmental Risk from Ionising Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA)","RED FIRE","bacterium","grass","deciduous tree","radionuclide"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Cs-137 activity concentrations were determined in grassy vegetation and soil using a high-purity germanium γ-detector (Model GC3019, Canberra-Packard, Connecticut, USA). A standard 137Cs/152Eu source (OISN-1; Applied Ecology Laboratory of Environmental Safety Centre, Odessa, Ukraine) was used for calibration. The minimal detectable activity was approximately 0.18 Bq per sample with uncertainties of approximately 10-15 percent (p=0.95) depending on the sample type. \n\nSr-90 activity concentrations were determined in soil and grassy vegetation samples using a β-spectrometer (EXPRESS-01) with a thin-filmed (0.1 mm) plastic scintillator detector. No radiochemical pre-treatment was required and samples were analysed as a solid matrix. Daily calibrations were conducted. Spectra were processed by correlating the sample spectra with those obtained from standard sources and those obtained from background measurements; uncertainties were approximately 20 percent (p=0.95).\nPrior to processing to determine activity concentrations of 241Am and Pu isotopes in soil samples, 242Pu and 243Am were added as yield tracers. Samples were dissolved in HF followed by treatment with HNO3, HCl, H3BO3+HNO3 and 8M HNO3. Plutonium and Am were separated using anion exchange resin (Bio Rad AG 1 × 8, 100-200 mesh). The Pu fraction was evaporated. Americium was precipitated with calcium oxalate and then separated using TRU resin columns; lanthanides were removed using an anion exchange resin column. Thin alpha sources of each separated actinide element were prepared by micro co-precipitation with neodymium fluoride and analysed using a Canberra Alpha Analyst alpha spectrometer. Counting errors were typically <20 percent.\n\nTo estimate the activity concentrations of Am-241 and Pu-isotopes for grassy vegetation transfer parameters (CRwo-soil) for Agrostis gigantea from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4) together with the appropriate measured soil activity concentration (DM). To estimate Sr-90 and Cs-137 activity concentrations in deciduous trees CRwo-soil values from sites within the CEZ were used (Holiaka et al. 2020) together with the measured soil activity concentrations (dry mass); for Am-241 and Pu-isotopes CRwo-soil values for Pinus sylvestris (wood) from a site within the Red Forest were used (Beresford et al. 2020; Table 4).\n\nWeighted absorbed dose rate estimations for grassy vegetation and deciduous tree wood were made using the ERICA Tool http://www.erica-tool.com/ (version 1.3) and the revised ‘R&D128’ spreadsheet model (https://wiki.ceh.ac.uk/display/rpemain/Ar+-+Kr+-+Xe+dose+calculator) was used to estimate the weighted absorbed dose to bacteria. The ambient dose rate (µSv h-1) on the soil surface was measured at each study plot using a MKS-01R meter.","locations":["POLYGON((30.001 51.342, 30.001 51.415, 30.091 51.415, 30.091 51.342, 30.001 51.342))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7247","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-8697","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2387","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Chernobyl Centre for Nuclear Safety","University of Salford","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674","10.5285/60782622-7bfa-4615-a9e3-0a802a9f4674"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/052dx1v90","https://ror.org/01tmqtf75","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalName":["TREE website","REDFIRE website","CHAR webpage"],"title":"Soil and vegetation radionuclide activity concentrations and calculated dose rates from the Red Forest, Chernobyl, Ukraine, 2016-2017","topic":["0/Radioecology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","danor"],"shortenedDescription":"Data comprise plot details and radionuclide activity concentrations for Sr-90, Cs-137, Am-241, Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240 in ‘grassy’ vegetation and soil. These radionuclide activity concentrations have been used to make estimations of total weighted absorbed doses to..."},{"publicationDate":"2013-12-31T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","The Food and Environment Research Agency","University of Stirling"],"authorGivenName":["C.L.","N.A.","L.A.","M.","C.","D."],"authorFamilyName":["Barnett","Beresford","Walker","Baxter","Wells","Copplestone"],"authorFullName":["Barnett, C.L.","Beresford, N.A.","Walker, L.A.","Baxter, M.","Wells, C.","Copplestone, D."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-7075"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/045wgfr59"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset presents the results of an initial sampling exercise conducted at a terrestrial site in northwest England in summer 2010. The following samples of terrestrial Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) were obtained from an area of circa 0.4 km squared: Molinia caerulea (ICRP RAP Wild Grass defined as Poaceae); Picea sitchensis (ICRP RAP Pine Tree defined as Pinaceae); Apis spp., Bombus spp., Nomada spp. (ICRP RAP Bee defined as Apidea); Apodemus sylvaticus (ICRP RAP Rat defined as Muridae); Earthworms (species in the Family Lumbricidae as defined for the ICRP RAP Earthworm); Deer (belonging to the Family Anatidae (i.e. the ICRP RAP Deer). Soil samples were also collected from throughout the sampling area. All samples were analysed for multiple elements using ICP-MS/ICP-OES and most for gamma-emitting radionuclides. Results have been used to derive biota-soil concentration ratios. The ICRP have published their framework for radiation protection of the environment (ICRP Publication 108). This describes the use of RAPs as the basis for their framework. The RAPs are generalised to the taxonomic level of Family. Publication 108 presented dose coefficient values for the selected RAPs and also reviewed data on the effects of ionising radiation to suggest Derived Consideration Reference Levels for each RAP. In summer 2010 the ICRP released a further report on their protection framework for consultation. This report presented transfer parameter values (organism-media concentration ratios) for Reference Animals and Plants. The report also raised the possibility of identifying a series of sites where samples of each Reference Animal and Plant, and their different lifestages, could be collected and analysed. It was suggested that the resultant data would constitute a set of reference values analogous to approaches used by the ICRP for human radiological protection.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"e40b53d4-6699-4557-bd55-10d196ece9ea","incomingCitationCount":6,"givenName":["Cath","C.L.","N.A.","L.A.","M.","C.","D."],"familyName":["Barnett","Beresford","Walker","Baxter","Wells","Copplestone"],"fullName":["Barnett, C.","Barnett, C.L.","Beresford, N.A.","Walker, L.A.","Baxter, M.","Wells, C.","Copplestone, D."],"keyword":["Cumbria","United Kingdom","Pollution","Radioecology","radioecology","ICRP RAP","chemical analysis","pine tree","deer","mice","TREE","COMET","bee","earthworm","grass","soil","radionuclide","natural radioactivity"],"keywordsPlace":["Cumbria","United Kingdom"],"keywordsTheme":["Pollution","Radioecology"],"keywordsOther":["radioecology","ICRP RAP","chemical analysis","pine tree","deer","mice","TREE","COMET","bee","earthworm","grass","soil","radionuclide","natural radioactivity"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The study site (circa 0.4 km2 in area) was located in a managed coniferous forestry plantation (c. 25 km2) in north-west England (NGR 3325 4917). It was largely a mixture of established coniferous plantation with an understory of predominantly grass and sedge species. Samples (bee, earthworm, sitka spruce, wood mouse, purple moor grass and soil) were collected from this area with the exception of Capreolus capreolus (Roe deer) which were collected from within the forest at distances of less than 2 km to the north and east of the main study site. Samples were collected between August 2010 and February 2011. The locations of all sampling sites were recorded using a hand held GPS. Biota and associated soils samples were analysed for stable element by ICP-MS by the Food and Environment Research Agency using methods accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). Sub samples were analysed to determine their C and N concentrations and samples with a higher mass were also analysed for gamma emitting radionuclides by CEH using a method also accredited by UKAS. The Percentage Loss on Ignition (LOI) and pH was also determined in the soil samples. For full details relating to each sample type collected in this study, 'please refer to the Online Resource: Supporting Documentation 'Materials and Methods_ICRP_RAP'.","locations":["POLYGON((-6.45 49.86, -6.45 55.81, 1.76 55.81, 1.76 49.86, -6.45 49.86))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-0238","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-7075"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","The Food and Environment Research Agency","University of Stirling","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["1314185575812","https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/e40b53d4-6699-4557-bd55-10d196ece9ea","10.5285/e40b53d4-6699-4557-bd55-10d196ece9ea"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/045wgfr59","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Element and radionuclide concentrations in representative species of the ICRP's Reference Animals and Plants and associated soils from a forest in north-west England","topic":["0/Pollution/","0/Radioecology/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","rjsc"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset presents the results of an initial sampling exercise conducted at a terrestrial site in northwest England in summer 2010. The following samples of terrestrial Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) were obtained from an area of circa 0.4 km squared: Molinia..."},{"publicationDate":"2020-03-27T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University"],"authorGivenName":["S.","W.","A."],"authorFamilyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"authorFullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"identifier":"7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","incomingCitationCount":1,"givenName":["S.","W.","A.","Stephen"],"familyName":["Cavers","Wachowiak","Perry"],"fullName":["Cavers, S.","Wachowiak, W.","Perry, A."],"keyword":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey","Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"keywordsTheme":["Biodiversity","Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Natural selection ","Speciation ","Divergence ","Polymorphism ","Genotyping ","SNPs","Population genomics ","Genomic ","Micoarray "],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Samples & Validation of the array was carried out using a subset of 87 samples, which included four species of pine (Pinus sylvestris: SY; P. mugo: MU; P. uncinata: UN; P. uliginosa: UL). DNA was extracted from needles using a Qiagen DNeasy 96 kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Needles were dried on silica gel prior to extraction and DNA was quantified using a Qubit spectrophotometer to ensure a minimum standardized concentration of 35ng/µl. The quality of genomic DNA was also checked visually for fragmentation on 1% agarose gel.\n\n Genotyping was done at Edinburgh Genomics following DNA amplification, fragmentation, chip hybridisation, single-base extension through DNA ligation and signal amplification performed according to the Affymetrix Axiom® Assay protocol. Genotyping was performed in 384-well format on a GeneTitan according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Genotype calls were performed using Axiom Analysis Suite software as recommended by the manufacturer (ThermoFisher). Samples were assigned to an analysis group based on their call rate (CR) and dish QC (DQC: a metric provided by ThermoFisher which is generated by measuring signals at multiple sites in the genome known not to vary among individuals), using the following thresholds: DQC 'high' ≥ 0.82; DQC 'low' < 0.82; CR 'high' ≥ 96; CR 'low' < 96. Analyses: 1) DQC high + CR high; 2) DQC high + CR low; 3) DQC low + CR low. High quality samples (N=529), with high CR and DQC, were used to set thresholds for allele calls. Posteriors for allele calls were subsequently used as priors for analyses 2 (N = 753) and 3 (N = 251).","locations":["POLYGON((-18.359 37.192, -18.359 67.115, 24.839 67.115, 24.839 37.192, -18.359 37.192))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-9236","https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3523","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-7597"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Adam Mickiewicz University","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2","10.5285/7ee55609-d6b1-4693-8b36-2bf84fef76c2"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04g6bbq64","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Scots pine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for Axiom array validation","topic":["0/Biodiversity/","0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"The dataset contains genotypes for samples used to validate a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, DNA mutation) Axiom array for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and closely related members of the Pinus mugo complex."},{"publicationDate":"2020-05-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["University of Reading/UKCEH","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["D.","H.J.","O.L.","J.T"],"authorFamilyName":["Stanbury","Dean","Pescott","Staley"],"authorFullName":["Stanbury, D.","Dean, H.J.","Pescott, O.L.","Staley, J.T."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-7202","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-8046","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-3712"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This dataset contains plant community data from a hedgerow experiment investigating the effects of cutting regimes on plant species richness. There were four sites, one in Buckinghamshire, two in Oxfordshire and one in Devon. Data were collected in 2016, using 1m x 10m quadrats on each side of the hedgerow at two positions. One quadrat was situated beneath the woody vegetation of the hedge (inner) and one adjacent to the inner quadrat (outer) to sample plant communities growing beside the hedge. Percentage vegetation cover was surveyed up to a height of 80cm.\n\nThe hedgerow experiment was one of three long running hedgerow experiments focusing on management to maintain and restore the hedgerow resource under agri-environment schemes. These long running experiments were funded by Defra and managed by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","identifier":"cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["D.","H.J.","O.L.","J.T","Joanna"],"familyName":["Stanbury","Dean","Pescott","Staley"],"fullName":["Stanbury, D.","Dean, H.J.","Pescott, O.L.","Staley, J.T.","Staley, J."],"keyword":["Oxfordshire","Buckinghamshire","Devon","Environmental survey","Biodiversity","hedgerow","plant species richness","biodiversity","plant species"],"keywordsPlace":["Oxfordshire","Buckinghamshire","Devon"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey","Biodiversity"],"keywordsOther":["hedgerow","plant species richness","biodiversity","plant species"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"Data were digitised into Excel after field collection and then imported into an Oracle database that contained all the data from the long running hedgerow experiments. The data provided here have been exported from the Oracle database. The following measures were taken to ensure quality and accuracy: a standard protocol was used, species data were collected by experienced and appropriately qualified field surveyors, species lists were checked by an expert, and data were checked for anomalous values both prior to and post import into the Oracle database.\n","locations":["POLYGON((-6.452 49.864, -6.452 55.812, 1.768 55.812, 1.768 49.864, -6.452 49.864))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-7202","https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0685-8046","https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-3712"],"organisation":["University of Reading/UKCEH","UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre","NERC Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f","10.5285/cfeceb7e-b6b5-4f40-a1bc-c25f38deeb9f"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","supplementalDescription":["J.T. Staley, N.P. Adams, S.R. Amy, M.S. Botham, L. Hulmes, S. Hulmes, H.J. Dean, M. McCracken, N. Mitschunas, R.E. Chapman, J.M. Peyton, J. Savage, L.E. Ridding, K.S. Baldock and R.F. Pywell (2018). Effects of hedgerow management and restoration on biodiversity. Defra research project BD2114. "],"supplementalName":["Effects of hedgerow management and restoration on biodiversity"],"title":"Plant community basal data from a hedgerow cutting experiment in England, 2016","topic":["0/Environmental survey/","0/Biodiversity/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","clwe"],"shortenedDescription":"This dataset contains plant community data from a hedgerow experiment investigating the effects of cutting regimes on plant species richness. There were four sites, one in Buckinghamshire, two in Oxfordshire and one in Devon. Data were collected in 2016, using 1m x..."},{"publicationDate":"2024-07-12T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology"],"authorGivenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"authorFamilyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"authorFullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"authorRor":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Nature Conservancy Council. A census of deciduous woodlands in Scotland was made (as marked on British Ordnance Survey (OS) maps, 7th Series 1:63,360), between 1976 and 1979. A desk-based map search was undertaken in the first instance, followed by field ground-truthing.","documentType":"GEMINI_DOCUMENT","funder":["Natural Environment Research Council","Nature Conservancy Council"],"identifier":"7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","incomingCitationCount":0,"givenName":["T.W.","R.G.H.","R.C.","C.M.","J.E.A.","B.A.","C.","A.","T.","K.L."],"familyName":["Parr","Bunce","Munro","Wood","Procter","Dodd","Balmer","Walker","Draycott","Wright"],"fullName":["Parr, T.W.","Bunce, R.G.H.","Munro, R.C.","Wood, C.M.","Procter, J.E.A.","Dodd, B.A.","Balmer, C.","Walker, A.","Draycott, T.","Wright, K.L."],"keyword":["Environmental survey","Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"keywordsTheme":["Environmental survey"],"keywordsOther":["Scotland","deciduous woodland","tree species","field survey"],"licence":"Open government licence","lineage":"The data were originally collected by members of staff at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, first as a desk-based exercise, and then during a field survey. A data rescue exercise was undertaken to re-digitise the data from the raw data sheets between 2019 and 2023. Quality checks were undertaken both at the time of the field collection, and later following data entry. Further detail is available in the supporting documentation.","locations":["POLYGON((-8.648 54.634, -8.648 60.861, -0.728 60.861, -0.728 54.634, -8.648 54.634))"],"orcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998"],"organisation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology","Institute of Terrestrial Ecology","NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre"],"recordType":"Dataset","resourceIdentifier":["https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291","10.5285/7b2eb903-e513-4210-a073-fddb6aa73291"],"resourceStatus":"Available","resourceType":"Dataset","rightsHolder":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"ror":["https://ror.org/00pggkr55","https://ror.org/04xw4m193"],"state":"published","title":"Extent and tree species composition from a Scottish deciduous woodland survey, 1976-1979","topic":["0/Environmental survey/"],"version":1.0,"view":["public","jashun"],"shortenedDescription":"A survey of the extent and species composition of the deciduous woodlands of Scotland (including those with some admixture of conifers) was undertaken between 1976 and 1979, by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council..."},{"publicationDate":"2025-07-07T00:00:00.000+00:00","authorAffiliation":["UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology"],"authorGivenName":["H","H. T.","B A","P O","K","G","S J"],"authorFamilyName":["Feuchtmayr","Carter","Dodd","Keenan","Le Quesne","McShane","Moorhouse","Rankin","Rhodes","Thackeray"],"authorFullName":["Feuchtmayr, H.","Carter, H.T.","Dodd, B.A.","Keenan, P.O.","Le Quesne, K.","McShane, G.","Moorhouse, H.","Rankin, G.","Rhodes, G.","Thackeray, S.J."],"authorOrcid":["https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-4843"],"catalogue":"eidc","description":"This is part of an ongoing long-term monitoring dataset of surface temperature, surface oxygen, water clarity, water chemistry and phytoplankton chlorophyll a from fortnightly sampling at the South Basin of Windermere in Cumbria, England, that began in 1945 for some variables. The data have been collected by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH). The data available to download comprise surface temperature (TEMP) in degree Celsius, surface oxygen saturation (OXYG) in % air-saturation, Secchi depth (SECC) in metres, alkalinity (ALKA) in µg per litre as CaCO3 and pH. Total ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4N), total oxidised nitrogen (TON), soluble reactive phosphate (PO4P), total phosphorus (TOTP), dissolved reactive silicon expressed as SiO2 (SIO2) and phytoplankton chlorophyll a (TOCA) are all given in µg per litre. Water samples are based on a sample integrated from 0 to 7m. Water chemistry values below the detection limit, are indicated by a < sign in the column titled ‘sign(if